Whether morning heart rate variability (HRV) predicts the magnitude of its circadian variation in the absence of disease or is influenced by chronotype is unclear. We aimed to quantify associations between (1) morning HRV and its diurnal change, and (2) morning HRV and a Morningness–Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ)-derived chronotype. Resting electrocardiograms were obtained in the morning and evening on separate days in a counterbalanced order to determine the mean RR interval, root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD), and standard deviation of normal-to-normal RR intervals (SDNN) in 23 healthy men (24.6 ± 3.4 yrs; body mass index: 25.3 ± 2.8 kg/m2). The MEQ was completed during the first laboratory visit. Morning RMSSD and SDNN were significantly higher (Ps < 0.05) than evening values. Morning RMSSD and SDNN were associated with their absolute (Ps < 0.0001), and relative diurnal changes (Ps < 0.01). No associations were observed between HRV parameters and the MEQ chronotypes (Ps > 0.09). Morning HRV was a stronger determinant of its evening change than chronotype. Greater diurnal variation in HRV was dependent on higher morning values. Strategies to improve basal HRV may therefore support healthier cardio-autonomic circadian profiles in healthy young men.
(1) Background: Breathing economy during endurance sports plays a major role in performance. Poor breathing economy is mainly characterized by excessive breathing frequency (BF) and low tidal volume (VT) due to shallow breathing. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a 4 week intervention based on the Wim Hof breathing method (WHBM) would improve breathing economy during exercise in adolescent runners. (2) Methods: 19 adolescent (16.6 ± 1.53 years) middle- and long-distance runners (11 boys and 8 girls) participated in the study. Participants were randomly divided into experimental (n = 11) and control groups (n = 8). The study was set in the transition period between competitive race seasons and both groups had a similar training program in terms of running volume and intensity over the course of the study. The experimental group performed breathing exercises every day (~20 min/day) for 4 weeks. The control group did not perform any kind of breathing exercise. The breathing exercises consisted of three sets of controlled hyperventilation and consecutive maximum breath holds. Before and after the intervention, participants performed incremental cycle ergometer testing sessions consisting of two minute stages at 1, 2, 3, and 4 W·kg−1 with breath-by-breath metabolic analysis. During the testing sessions, BF, VT, and minute ventilation (VE) were assessed and compared. (3) Results: There were no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) in BF, VT, or VE between experimental and control groups before or after the intervention. A nonsignificant small-to-large effect for an increase in VE and BF in both groups following the 4 week intervention period was observed, possibly due to a reduction in training volume and intensity owing to the down period between competitive seasons. (4) Conclusions: The 4 week intervention of WHBM did not appear to alter parameters of breathing economy during a maximal graded exercise test in adolescent runners.