Lauren Cirrincione

Dr. Lauren Cirrincione


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 May 2021 in Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LCLauren Cirrincione
Lauren Cirrincione
KHKai J. Huang
Kai J. Huang
The transgender adult population is growing globally, but clinical pharmacology has lagged behind other areas of transgender medicine. Medical care for transgender adults may include long‐term testosterone or estrogen treatment to align secondary sex characteristics with gender identity. Clinicians often use drug–drug interaction data from the general adult population to predict medication disposition or safety among transgender adults. However, this approach does not address the complex pharmacodynamic effects of hormone therapy in transgender adults. In this review, we critically examine sex‐related and gender‐related differences in clinical pharmacology and apply these data to discuss current gaps in transgender medicine.

1 May 2020 in Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LCLauren Cirrincione
Lauren Cirrincione
APAnthony T Podany
Anthony T Podany
JHJoshua P Havens
Joshua P Havens
SBSara H Bares
Sara H Bares
SDShetty Ravi Dyavar
Shetty Ravi Dyavar
KSKimberly K Scarsi
Kimberly K Scarsi
Transwomen have an increased risk of HIV acquisition compared with other adults. Drug–drug interactions between pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and gender-affirming therapy are cited as a reason for poor PrEP uptake among transwomen. We evaluated plasma tenofovir and emtricitabine pharmacokinetics and their active intracellular anabolites, tenofovir-diphosphate and emtricitabine-triphosphate, in transwomen receiving feminizing hormones. We enrolled HIV-negative transwomen (≥19 years) not receiving PrEP. Participants took oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine 300/200 mg daily for 14 days. Plasma was collected at 0 h (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 12 h on day 14 post-tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine dose. The plasma AUC0–24 was calculated using the trapezoidal rule and compared with historical HIV-negative cisgender adults as geometric mean ratios (GMRs, 90% CI). Secondarily, tenofovir-diphosphate and emtricitabine-triphosphate from PBMCs collected at 0 h and 12 h were reported descriptively as geometric means (90% CI). Clinical trials registration: NCT03270969. Among 15 transwomen (mean age 32 years), geometric mean tenofovir and emtricitabine plasma AUC0–24 were lower compared with controls: tenofovir, 2.10 versus 2.76 mg·h/L, GMR 0.76 (0.65–0.90), P = 0.01; emtricitabine, 9.15 versus 10.64 mg·h/L, GMR 0.86 (0.75–0.98), P = 0.07. Tenofovir-diphosphate and emtricitabine-triphosphate concentrations were higher than previously reported in the literature: 167.1 (146.6–190.5) fmol/106 cells and 15.4 (13.8–17.3) pmol/106 cells, respectively. We observed lower plasma tenofovir and emtricitabine concentrations in transwomen compared with historical cisgender adults, yet intracellular tenofovir-diphosphate and emtricitabine-triphosphate concentrations were higher than previously reported in PBMCs. Understanding the differences of PrEP pharmacokinetics in plasma and tissue compartments and the resultant impact on efficacy remains important for transwomen.

20 October 2021 in Annals of Pharmacotherapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SFSarah K. Fadich
Sarah K. Fadich
AKAlin Kalayjian
Alin Kalayjian
DGDina N. Greene
Dina N. Greene
LCLauren Cirrincione
Lauren Cirrincione
Background: Clinicians use sex-based kidney function estimating equations, but the appropriate sex modifier for transgender adults undergoing hormone therapy (HT) is undetermined. Objectives: Compare median estimated creatinine clearance (eCrCL; Cockcroft-Gault) and estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs; Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD] and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Study [CKD-EPI]) before and during HT when estimated with and without sex assigned at birth. Methods: Single-system retrospective cohort study of transgender adults (2007-2017) prescribed ≥90 days HT (index date = first order) and measured serum creatinine ≤6 months pre-index date (baseline) and ≤12 months post-index date. We grouped patients based on testosterone or estrogen treatment and compared eCrCL and eGFRs at baseline up to 6-12 months post-index date using equations based on sex assigned at birth (female or male modifier in testosterone or estrogen groups, respectively) or gender identity (male or female modifier in testosterone or estrogen groups, respectively). We used Wilcoxon signed-rank tests (Bonferroni correction) for all comparisons. Results: In total, 29 (median age 26 years, follow-up 259 days) and 41 patients (29 years, 250 days) were prescribed testosterone or estrogen, respectively. In the testosterone group, the maximum eCrCL and eGFR changes based on sex assigned at birth were −14%, P = 0.0181; −18%; P = 0.0009, respectively, and based on gender identity were +5%, P > 0.025 and +11%, P = 0.0094, respectively. In the estrogen group, eCrCL or eGFRs based on sex assigned at birth did not change from baseline but based on gender identity were −17%, P < 0.0001 and −26%, P < 0.0001, respectively. Conclusion and Relevance: Female-based equations may underestimate kidney function in transgender adults undergoing testosterone or estrogen treatment. Prospective cohort studies are needed to confirm the clinical significance of these findings.

26 April 2022 in Trends in Pharmacological Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ALAn Le
An Le
KHKai J. Huang
Kai J. Huang
LCLauren Cirrincione
Lauren Cirrincione

20 December 2021 in Clinical Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMark A Marzinke
Mark A Marzinke
DGDina N Greene
Dina N Greene
PBPatrick M Bossuyt
Patrick M Bossuyt
ACAllison B Chambliss
Allison B Chambliss
LCLauren Cirrincione
Lauren Cirrincione
MHMelanie P Hoenig
Melanie P Hoenig
Background: Commonly used estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equations include a Black race modifier (BRM) that was incorporated during equation derivation. Race is a social construct, and a poorly characterized variable that is applied inconsistently in clinical settings. The BRM results in higher eGFR for any creatinine concentration, implying fundamental differences in creatinine production or excretion in Black individuals compared to other populations. Equations without inclusion of the BRM have the potential to detect kidney disease earlier in patients at the greatest risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD), but also has the potential to over-diagnose CKD or impact downstream clinical interventions. The purpose of this study was to use an evidence-based approach to systematically evaluate the literature relevant to the performance of the eGFR equations with and without the BRM and to examine the clinical impact of the use or removal. Content: PubMed and Embase databases were searched for studies comparing measured GFR to eGFR in racially diverse adult populations using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease or the 2009-Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration-creatinine equations based on standardized creatinine measurements. Additionally, we searched for studies comparing clinical use of eGFR calculated with and without the BRM. Here, 8632 unique publications were identified; an additional 3 studies were added post hoc. In total, 96 studies were subjected to further analysis and 44 studies were used to make a final assessment. Summary: There is limited published evidence to support the use of a BRM in eGFR equations.

1 February 2022 in Endocrine Connections
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LCLauren Cirrincione
Lauren Cirrincione
BCBridgit O Crews
Bridgit O Crews
JDJane A Dickerson
Jane A Dickerson
MKMatthew D Krasowski
Matthew D Krasowski
JRJessica Rongitsch
Jessica Rongitsch
DGDina N Greene
Dina N Greene
Objectives: Recently, an estradiol immunoassay manufacturer (Beckman Coulter, USA) issued an “Important Product Notice” alerting clinical laboratories their assay (Access Sensitive Estradiol) was not indicated for patients undergoing exogenous estradiol treatment. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate immunoassay bias relative to liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) in transgender women and to examine the influence of unconjugated estrone on measurements. Design: Cross sectional secondary analysis. Methods: Estradiol concentrations from 89 transgender women were determined by three immunoassays (Access Sensitive Estradiol [‘New BC’] and Access Estradiol assays [‘Old BC’], Beckman Coulter; Estradiol III assay [‘Roche’], Roche Diagnostics) and LC-MS/MS. Bias was evaluated with and without adjustment for estrone concentrations. The number of participants who shifted between three estradiol concentration ranges for each immunoassay versus LC-MS/MS (>300 pg/mL, 70-300 pg/mL, and <70 pg/mL) was calculated. Results: The New BC assay had the largest magnitude overall bias (median: -34%) and was -40%, -22%, and -10%, among participants receiving tablet, patch, or injection preparations, respectively. Overall bias was -12% and +17% for the Roche and Old BC assays, respectively. When measured with the New BC assay, 18 participants shifted to a lower estradiol concentration range (versus 9 and 10 participants based on Roche or Old BC assays, respectively). Adjustment for estrone did not minimize bias. Conclusions: Immunoassay measurement of estradiol in transgender women may lead to falsely decreased concentrations that have the potential to affect management. A multi-disciplinary health care approach is needed to ensure appropriate analytical methods are available.