Extraglandular manifestations (EGMs) in primary Sjogren’s syndrome (pSS) represent the clinical expression of the systemic involvement in this disease. EGMs are characterized by a wide heterogeneity; virtually any organ or system can be affected, with various degrees of dysfunction. The existing gaps of knowledge in this complex domain of extraglandular extension in pSS need to be overcome in order to increase the diagnostic accuracy of EGMs in pSS. The timely identification of EGMs, as early as from subclinical stages, can be facilitated using highly specific biomarkers, thus preventing decompensated disease and severe complications. To date, there is no general consensus on the diagnostic criteria for the wide range of extraglandular involvement in pSS, which associates important underdiagnosing of EGMs, subsequent undertreatment and progression to severe organ dysfunction in these patients. This review article presents the most recent basic and clinical science research conducted to investigate pathogenic mechanisms leading to EGMs in pSS patients. In addition, it presents the current diagnostic and treatment recommendations and the trends for future therapeutic strategies based on personalized treatment, as well as the latest research in the field of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for extraglandular involvement in pSS.

Background: Primary Sjögren syndrome (pSS) is a multisystem disorder of autoimmune etiology, frequently involving peripheral nerves. Early detection of peripheral neuropathy (PN) manifestations might improve prognosis and disease control. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the predictive potential of hematological and immunological parameters associated with PN development in pSS patients. Methods: This single-center retrospective study included patients with pSS who were divided into two groups, according to the occurrence of neurological manifestations throughout the follow-up period. Results: From the total of 121 pSS patients included in the study, 31 (25.61%) developed neurological manifestations (PN+ group) during the follow-up period. At the moment of pSS diagnosis, 80.64% of PN+ patients exhibited increased disease activity, with ESSDAI scores above 14 (p = 0.001), and significantly higher values for VASp score (p = 0.001), with a mean value of 4.90 ± 2.45, compared to 1.27 ± 1.32 in the PN- group. The hematological assessment at the moment of pSS diagnosis revealed that neutrophils and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were significantly higher in the PN+ group (p = 0.001), while lymphocytes, monocytes and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) were significantly lower (p = 0.025, p = 0.13 and p = 0.003, respectively). Immuno-inflammatory parameters—gammaglobulins, complement fractions C3, C4, total proteins and vitamin D were significantly lower in the PN+ patients’ group. In multivariate analysis, the independent predictive character for PN development in pSS patients was confirmed for NLR (95% CI 0.033 to 0.263, p = 0.012), MLR (95% CI −1.289 to −0.194, p = 0.008), gammaglobulins (95% CI −0.426 to −0.088, p < 0.003), complement fraction C4 (95% CI −0.018 to −0.001, p < 0.030) and vitamin D (95% CI −0.017 to −0.003, p < 0.009). Conclusions: Readily available and frequently used hematological and immunological markers, such as NLR, MLR, gammaglobulins, C4 and vitamin D could be helpful in predicting the neurological involvement in pSS patients. These biological parameters might become useful tools for clinicians to monitor disease progression and identify potentially severe extraglandular manifestations in pSS patients.

COVID-19 has significantly affected public health, social life, and economies worldwide. The only effective way to combat the pandemic is through vaccines. Although the vaccines have been in use for some time, safety concerns have still been raised. The most typical adverse effects of receiving a COVID-19 vaccine are localized reactions near the injection site, followed by general physical symptoms such as headaches, fatigue, muscle pain, and fever. Additionally, some people may experience VITT (vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia), a rare side effect after vaccination. We present the case of a 60-year-old female patient that developed VITT-like symptoms with spleno-portal thrombosis and intestinal ischemia two weeks after the administration of the Ad26.COV2-S vaccine. Surgical treatment consisted of extensive bowel resection with end jejunostomy and feeding ileostomy. Two weeks after the first operation, a duodenal-ileal anastomosis was performed. The patient was discharged five weeks after the onset of the symptoms. Although some rare adverse effects are associated with the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, the risk of hospitalization from these harmful effects is lower than the risk of hospitalization from COVID-19. Therefore, recognizing VITT is significant for ensuring the early treatment of clots and proper follow-up.