Colin J. McMahon

Prof. Colin J. McMahon

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 March 2007 in Pediatric Cardiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CMColin J. McMahon
Colin J. McMahon
MTM. D. Taylor
M. D. Taylor
CCC. I. Cassady
C. I. Cassady
OOO. O. Olutoye
O. O. Olutoye
LBL. I. Bezold
L. I. Bezold

15 April 2021 in Pediatric Cardiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DODonnchadh Martin O’sullivan
Donnchadh Martin O’sullivan
RFRoss Foley
Ross Foley
KPKate Proctor
Kate Proctor
SGSarah Gallagher
Sarah Gallagher
ADAoife Deery
Aoife Deery
CMColin J. McMahon
Colin J. McMahon

28 February 2007 in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CMColin J. McMahon
Colin J. McMahon
POPaul Oslizlok
Paul Oslizlok
KWKevin P. Walsh
Kevin P. Walsh

15 December 2020 in Cardiology in the Young
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CMColin J. McMahon
Colin J. McMahon
JTJustin Tretter
Justin Tretter
TFTheresa Faulkner
Theresa Faulkner
RKR. Krishna Kumar
R. Krishna Kumar
ARAndrew N. Redington
Andrew N. Redington
JWJonathan D. Windram
Jonathan D. Windram
Objective: This study investigated the impact of the Webinar on deep human learning of CHD.Materials and methods: This cross-sectional survey design study used an open and closed-ended questionnaire to assess the impact of the Webinar on deep learning of topical areas within the management of the post-operative tetralogy of Fallot patients. This was a quantitative research methodology using descriptive statistical analyses with a sequential explanatory design.Results: One thousand-three-hundred and seventy-four participants from 100 countries on 6 continents joined the Webinar, 557 (40%) of whom completed the questionnaire. Over 70% of participants reported that they “agreed” or “strongly agreed” that the Webinar format promoted deep learning for each of the topics compared to other standard learning methods (textbook and journal learning). Two-thirds expressed a preference for attending a Webinar rather than an international conference. Over 80% of participants highlighted significant barriers to attending conferences including cost (79%), distance to travel (49%), time commitment (51%), and family commitments (35%). Strengths of the Webinar included expertise, concise high-quality presentations often discussing contentious issues, and the platform quality. The main weakness was a limited time for questions. Just over 53% expressed a concern for the carbon footprint involved in attending conferences and preferred to attend a Webinar.Conclusion: E-learning Webinars represent a disruptive innovation, which promotes deep learning, greater multidisciplinary participation, and greater attendee satisfaction with fewer barriers to participation. Although Webinars will never fully replace conferences, a hybrid approach may reduce the need for conferencing, reduce carbon footprint. and promote a “sustainable academia”.

4 October 2017 in Pediatric Cardiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ARAedin Ryan
Aedin Ryan
SDSophie Duignan
Sophie Duignan
DKDamien Kenny
Damien Kenny
CMColin J. McMahon
Colin J. McMahon

12 April 2021 in Cardiology in the Young
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CMColin J. McMahon
Colin J. McMahon
JTJustin Tretter
Justin Tretter
ARAndrew N. Redington
Andrew N. Redington
FBFrances Bu’lOck
Frances Bu’lOck
LZLiesl Zühlke
Liesl Zühlke
JWJonathan D. Windram
Jonathan D. Windram
Despite enormous strides in our field with respect to patient care, there has been surprisingly limited dialogue on how to train and educate the next generation of congenital cardiologists. This paper reviews the current status of training and evolving developments in medical education pertinent to congenital cardiology. The adoption of competency-based medical education has been lauded as a robust framework for contemporary medical education over the last two decades. However, inconsistencies in frameworks across different jurisdictions remain, and bridging gaps between competency frameworks and clinical practice has proved challenging. Entrustable professional activities have been proposed as a solution, but integration of such activities into busy clinical cardiology practices will present its own challenges. Consequently, this pivot towards a more structured approach to medical education necessitates the widespread availability of appropriately trained medical educationalists, a development that will better inform curriculum development, instructional design, and assessment. Differentiation between superficial and deep learning, the vital role of rich formative feedback and coaching, should guide our trainees to become self-regulated learners, capable of critical reasoning yet retaining an awareness of uncertainty and ambiguity. Furthermore, disruptive innovations such as “technology enhanced learning” may be leveraged to improve education, especially for trainees from low- and middle-income countries. Each of these initiatives will require resources, widespread advocacy and raised awareness, and publication of supporting data, and so it is especially gratifying thatCardiology in the Younghas fostered a progressive approach, agreeing to publish one or two articles in each journal issue in this domain.