Jessica Keim-Malpass

Dr. Jessica Keim-Malpass

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 July 2006 in Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KMKihyuck Moon
Kihyuck Moon
GSGeorge J. Stukenborg
George J. Stukenborg
JKJessica Keim-Malpass
Jessica Keim-Malpass
DTDan Theodorescu
Dan Theodorescu
BACKGROUND.: Second cancers may occur in patients who have undergone radiation therapy. The risk for these adverse events after therapy is uncertain. In this study, the authors examined the size and significance of the observed association between occurrences of secondary cancers 5 years after radiotherapy in a large population of men with incident prostate cancer.METHODS.: Men with incident prostate cancer were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry and were distinguished by the type of treatment received, tumor stage, tumor grade, and age at diagnosis. SEER data also were used to identify occurrences of secondary cancer beginning 5 years after the date patients were diagnosed with prostate cancer. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the adjusted odds of the subsequent occurrence of other cancers associated with types of radiation therapy received and was adjusted for the type of surgery, tumor grade, stage, and patient age.RESULTS.: Compared with men who received no prostate cancer‐directed radiation, men who received external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) as their only form of radiation therapy had statistically significant increased odds of developing secondary cancers at several sites potentially related to radiation therapy, including the bladder (odds ratio [OR], 1.63; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.44–1.84) and rectum (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.29–1.99). Men who received EBRT also had statistically significant higher odds of developing secondary cancers at sites in the upper body and other areas not potentially related to radiation therapy, including the cecum (OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.10–1.70), transverse colon (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.30–2.63), brain (OR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.22–2.75), stomach (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.09–1.75), melanoma (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.09–1.53), and lung and bronchus (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.13–1.37) compared with the odds among men who received no radiation therapy. Men who received radiation therapy in the form of radioactive implants or isotopes, either in isolation or combined with beam radiation, did not have significantly different odds of secondary cancer occurring at any of the 20 most common sites.CONCLUSIONS.: Patients who received with EBRT had significantly higher odds of developing second cancers both overall and in the areas that were exposed to radiation. It is noteworthy that, to the authors' knowledge, this report shows for the first time that, despite the higher doses of radiation delivered, patients who received radioactive implants had the lowest odds of developing second cancers. Cancer 2006. © 2006 American Cancer Society.

20 June 2010 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MRMary E. Ropka
Mary E. Ropka
JKJessica Keim-Malpass
Jessica Keim-Malpass
JPJohn T. Philbrick
John T. Philbrick
Purpose: Women at high risk of breast cancer face the complex decision of whether to take tamoxifen or raloxifene for breast cancer chemoprevention. We investigated what is known about decisions of women regarding chemoprevention. Methods: Using MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PSYCINFO, plus reviewing reference lists of relevant articles, in December 2009 we identified 13 studies that addressed patient decisions about breast cancer chemoprevention, were published in 1995 or later, were peer-reviewed primary clinical studies, and reported rates at which participants showed interest in (hypothetical uptake) or accepted (real uptake) chemoprevention medications. Results: Nine studies provided information about hypothetical breast cancer chemoprevention decisions (mean uptake rate, 24.7%) and five provided information about real decisions (mean uptake rate, 14.8%). The range of rates was wide, and each of the hypothetical uptake studies assessed interest differently. A logistic regression model found significant correlation with uptake of decision type (hypothetical versus real, odds ratio [OR] = 1.65; 95% CI, 1.26 to 2.16), educational or decision support intervention (provided v not, OR = 0.21; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.27), and cohort risk for breast cancer (high-risk v general population, OR = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.75). Perceived vulnerability to breast cancer was consistently correlated with increased uptake, and concern for adverse effects was correlated with reduced uptake. All studies used a correlational/descriptive design, and most studies used convenience sampling strategies. Conclusion: Breast cancer chemoprevention uptake rates are low and variation is wide. Hypothetical uptake rates are higher than real uptake, and interventions markedly reduce uptake. Research is needed that uses reproducible sampling methods and examines decision support strategies that lead to quality decisions.

5 August 2015 in BMC Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JKJessica Keim-Malpass
Jessica Keim-Malpass
LLLisa C. Letzkus
Lisa C. Letzkus
CKChristine Kennedy
Christine Kennedy
Children with special health care needs (CSHCN) are children with medical or behavioral diagnoses that require services beyond those generally needed by pediatric populations. They account for a significant portion of pediatric health care expenditures and often have complicated treatment regiments. Health literacy has recently been recognized as a key indicator of quality chronic disease self-management and parental/caregiver health literacy of CSHCN is an understudied area. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the available evidence of studies investigating parent/caregiver health literacy of CSHCN. Databases were searched to retrieve relevant articles for inclusion (dating from 1998 to 2014). Only studies that assessed the relationship between parent/caregiver health literacy on outcomes pertinent to CSHCN were included. Because of the limited number of studies, there were no restrictions placed on type of outcome. Thirteen studies were included in the final review with a range of health literacy assessments and outcome ascertainment. The majority of studies; (1) focused on the relationship between parental/caregiver health literacy and asthma outcomes, (2) were cross-sectional study designs, and (3) included samples recruited from pediatric clinics in academic medical settings. There were several gaps in the literature where future research is needed including; (1) direct assessment of child/adolescent health literacy, (2) inclusion of children with co-morbid conditions, (3) further assessment of the relationship between health literacy and health care utilization and cost, and (4) assessment of parental/caregiver health literacy in the inpatient care setting.

6 March 2017 in Public Health Nursing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JKJessica Keim-Malpass
Jessica Keim-Malpass
EMEmma M. Mitchell
Emma M. Mitchell
ESEmily Sun
Emily Sun
CKChristine Kennedy
Christine Kennedy

1 December 2014 in Journal of Palliative Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JKJessica Keim-Malpass
Jessica Keim-Malpass
JEJeanne M. Erickson
Jeanne M. Erickson
HMH. Charles Malpass
H. Charles Malpass
Evidence suggests nonelderly adults with cancer are likely to receive aggressive treatment in their last month of life and less likely to receive hospice and/or palliative services. Young adults with cancer (18-39 years) are a unique population, and little is known about the characteristics of their end-of-life care trajectories when they die in the hospital. The purpose of this descriptive pilot study was to explore the characteristics of death among young adults with cancer who died in a tertiary academic hospital in order to elucidate their end-of-life trajectories. A retrospective chart review was conducted among hospitalized young adults with a primary cancer diagnosis who died in the hospital within a 10-year period. Study variables were abstracted for quantification and medical record notes were reviewed for validation. A review of 61 patient records indicate that young adults commonly received cancer treatment within weeks of death and that do-not-resuscitate orders were frequently written only when death appeared imminent. Palliative care teams were frequently consulted for management of physical symptoms but often within days of death and most commonly on the day of death. Findings suggest palliative care was initiated late in the care trajectory for young adults with cancer who died in the hospital. This study highlights the need for further inquiry into end-of-life care for young adults with cancer so that interventions can be developed to meet the physical, emotional, social, and spiritual needs of this unique group of patients, their families, and friends.

1 March 2013 in Cancer Nursing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JKJessica Keim-Malpass
Jessica Keim-Malpass
MBMarianne Baernholdt
Marianne Baernholdt
JEJeanne M. Erickson
Jeanne M. Erickson
MRMary E. Ropka
Mary E. Ropka
ASAnneke T. Schroen
Anneke T. Schroen
RSRichard H. Steeves
Richard H. Steeves
Many young women have turned to illness blogs to describe their lived experience with cancer. Blogs represent an untapped source of knowledge for researchers and clinicians. The purpose of this qualitative, exploratory study was to describe the life disruptions caused by cancer among young women, as well as to understand the facilitators and barriers in accessing healthcare services during and after active treatment. Sixteen Internet illness blogs were analyzed among women, aged between 20 and 39 years, diagnosed with cancer. These blogs were analyzed based on phenomenological qualitative methods and thematic analysis. There were 4 dimensions of persistent problems that were articulated in the narratives of the young women without any relief. They included pain and fatigue, insurance and financial barriers, concerns related to fertility, and symptoms of posttraumatic stress and anxiety. The young women's narratives capture fear, uncertainty, anger, and the debilitating nature of these persistent issues. Many of the women expressed their lingering physical, psychosocial, and emotional problems. Online illness narratives are a naturalistic form of inquiry that allows nurses to understand the experience of the patient through their own words and accounts. This study provides a foundation for nursing-based interventions that transcend traditional clinic experiences.