The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of lutein, zeaxanthin and meso-zeaxanthin on macular pigment optical density (MPOD) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) among patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and healthy subjects. Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases was searched through May 2016. Meta-analysis was conducted to obtain adjusted weighted mean differences (WMD) for intervention-versus-placebo group about the change of MPOD between baseline and terminal point. Pearson correlation analysis was used to determine the relationship between the changes in MPOD and blood xanthophyll carotenoids or baseline MPOD levels. Twenty RCTs involving 938 AMD patients and 826 healthy subjects were identified. Xanthophyll carotenoids supplementation was associated with significant increase in MPOD in AMD patients (WMD, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.11) and healthy subjects (WMD, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.14). Stratified analysis showed a greater increase in MPOD among trials supplemented and combined with meso-zeaxanthin. Additionally, the changes in MPOD were related with baseline MPOD levels (r_AMD = −0.43, p = 0.06; r_{healthy subjects} = −0.71, p < 0.001) and blood xanthophyll carotenoids concentration (r_AMD = 0.40, p = 0.07; r_{healthy subjects} = 0.33, p = 0.05). This meta-analysis revealed that lutein, zeaxanthin and meso-zeaxanthin supplementation improved MPOD both in AMD patients and healthy subjects with a dose-response relationship.

Background Patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) are at increased risk of both hepatic and extrahepatic adverse outcomes. However, the evidence regarding lean MASLD and its prognosis remains controversial. Objective To comprehensively investigate the long-term prognosis of lean patients with MASLD versus non-lean MASLD in Western and Asian populations. Design This prospective multicohort study included 153 192 patients with MASLD from UK Biobank (UKB), 29 700 from Kailuan cohort and 3329 from China Kadoorie Biobank (CKB). Lean MASLD was defined as body mass index (BMI)<23 kg/m² in Kailuan and CKB and <25 kg/m² in UKB. Primary endpoints were liver-related events (LREs), all-cause mortality, liver-related mortality (LRM), cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality, CVD, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and extrahepatic cancer. Results Overall, 181 191 non-lean and 5030 lean patients with MASLD were included. During a median of 14.2-year follow-up (median 14.1, 14.8 and 13.4 years in UKB, Kailuan and CKB), 2501 incident LREs, 22 482 all-cause deaths, 28 722 incident CVD cases, 326 HCC and 25 258 extrahepatic cancer cases were identified, with 375 LRM and 4511 CVD deaths. Pooled analysis of three cohorts showed lean MASLD had higher risks of LREs (HR=2.14; 95% CI 1.27 to 3.62), all-cause mortality (HR=1.26; 95% CI 1.14 to 1.39), LRM (HR=2.31; 95% CI 1.54 to 3.46) and CVD mortality (HR=1.22; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.41). By contrast, lean MASLD exhibited comparable HCC risk (HR=1.76; 95% CI 0.84 to 3.71) and extrahepatic cancer risk (HR=1.14; 95% CI 0.88 to 1.48), but reduced CVD risk (HR=0.89; 95% CI 0.83 to 0.95) versus non-lean MASLD. Conclusion Lean patients with MASLD have worse liver outcomes and greater risk of all-cause mortality, but similar risk of HCC and extrahepatic cancer, and lower CVD risk.

Background: Asymptomatic or symptomatic infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can be followed by reinfection. The protection conferred by prior infection among coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients is unclear. We assessed the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection and the protection effect of previous infection against reinfection. Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov for publications up until the end date of May 1, 2021. The reinfection rate of recovered patients and the protection against reinfection were analyzed using meta-analysis. Results: Overall, 19 studies of 1096 reinfection patients were included. The pooled reinfection rate was 0.65% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39–0.98%). The symptomatic reinfection rate was a bit lower (0.37% [95% CI 0.11–0.78%], I ² = 99%). The reinfection rate was much higher in high-risk populations (1.59% [95% CI 0.30–3.88%], I ² = 90%). The protection against reinfection and symptomatic reinfection was similar (87.02% [95% CI 83.22–89.96%] and 87.17% [95% CI 83.09–90.26%], respectively). Conclusions: The rate of reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 is relatively low. The protection against SARS-CoV-2 after natural infection is comparable to that estimated for vaccine efficacy. These data may help guide public health measures and vaccination strategies in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. High-quality clinical studies are needed to establish the relevant risk factors in recovered patients.

Ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption has been steadily increasing globally, yet the associated risk of all-cause mortality remains unclear. We aimed to assess the risk of all-cause mortality of UPFs via an updated systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for studies published until July 2, 2024, in addition to referred studies included in the previous systematic review. Prospective cohort studies assessing the association between NOVA classification-defined UPF consumption and all-cause mortality were included. Dose-response meta-analysis via a random-effect model was used to combine the results with hazard ratio (HR) as an effect measure. Overall, 18 studies with 1,148,387 participants (173,107 deaths) were identified. Compared to the lowest, participants with the highest UPF consumption had a 15% increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.09–1.22; I2 = 83.0%). Furthermore, a 10% higher risk of all-cause mortality was detected with each 10% increment in UPF consumption (HR = 1.10, 95% CI 1.04–1.16; I2 = 91.0%). Dose-response analysis showed a positive linear association (Pdose-response < 0.001). Moreover, subgroups and sensitivity analyses indicated consistent findings, while meta-regression analyses suggested sex distributions partially explained heterogeneity, with a higher risk of all-cause mortality in males. Our updated meta-analysis, incorporating a greater number of newly published cohort studies using NOVA classification with the largest sample size to date, strengthens the evidence linking higher UPF consumption to increased all-cause mortality risk. Strategies such as dietary guidelines and policies for limiting UPF consumption worldwide should be encouraged. PROSPERO CRD42023467226.

Background-objectives: Liver transplantation (LT) and combined liver and kidney transplantation (CLKT) have been proposed as enzyme replacement therapies for methylmalonic aciduria (MMA). We aimed to synthesize the available evidence on their safety and efficacy. Medline, Embase and Cochrane library were searched to identify studies that reported post-LT/CLKT clinical outcomes of MMA from their inception to February 1, 2020. The pooled rate was calculated using random-effects model with Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation method. Thirty-two studies involving 109 patients were included. The pooled estimate rates were 99.9% (95% CI 95.3-100.0) for patient survival, 98.5% (95% CI 91.5-100.0) for graft survival after LT/CLKT. The combined incidence of biliary, vascular complications and rejection were 0.2% (95% CI 0.0-6.6), 7.7% (95% CI 0.1-22.1) and 18.4% (95% CI 4.6-36.3), respectively. The pooled estimate rates were 100.0% (95% CI 99.4-100.0) for metabolic eradication, 61.5% (95% CI: 33.4-87.0) for normalization of kidney function. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) remission is more promising after CLKT (70.3% VS 37.6% in LT group). The pooled estimate rates for neurodevelopmental status improvement and protein intake liberalization were 52.0% (95% CI 2.8-98.8) and 36.3% (95% CI 6.3-71.7), respectively. This first quantitative systematic review confirms favorable survival outcomes and partially improved disease-related complications in transplanted MMA patients, although some results should be interpreted with caution. Future studies with detailed description of long-term outcomes and consensus on neurodevelopmental evaluation method can help provide a more accurate picture.