Linghong Tang

Dr. Linghong Tang


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 June 2023 in Processes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XCXianbing Chen
Xianbing Chen
LFLiwei Fang
Liwei Fang
SJShouyi Jiao
Shouyi Jiao
Jingzhi ZhangJingzhi Zhang
Jingzhi Zhang
LSLeitai Shi
Leitai Shi
Linghong TangLinghong Tang
Linghong Tang
In the published experimental results, it has been observed that when high-speed steam spurt into the subcooled waterflow, the total pressure along the axial direction at trailing edge of the steam plume shows a pressure-lift. To reveal the mechanism behind this phenomenon, this study utilizes a particle model to investigate the pressure profile of steam jet condensation in subcooled water flow in a narrow pipe. A numerical model based on the Eulerian–Eulerian multiphase model has been developed to accurately simulate the characteristics of pressure profile along the axial direction. The model’s validity is established by comparing the steam plume shape and temperature profiles with the experimental data. By analyzing the total pressure profile of the axis and the contours of gas volume fraction, it is found that there exists a pressure-lift phenomenon at trailing edge of the steam plume. The dynamic pressure of the water also shows a pressure-lift at this position, so it can be inferred that the dynamic pressure of the water is the main factor of the total pressure-lift.

2 December 2022 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HKHanbing Ke
Hanbing Ke
QXQi Xiao
Qi Xiao
CLChengyi Long
Chengyi Long
JLJialun Liu
Jialun Liu
LSLeitai Shi
Leitai Shi
Linghong TangLinghong Tang
Linghong Tang
A centered water nozzle steam–water injector is driven by cold water to pump steam at a low pressure and to produce a high outlet water pressure. It can be used as a safety pump in a light water reactor to inject cooling water into the reactor core with no power supply in case of an accident. In this study, a modified calculation method for a centered water nozzle steam–water injector is proposed and verified by experimental data in the literature. The calculation method consists of a water nozzle model, a steam nozzle model, a mixing section model, and a shock wave model. Comparisons between the calculated results and the experimental results under different inlet steam pressures, inlet water pressures, and back pressures are conducted, and the calculated results show good agreement with the experimental results. The calculated results with different back pressures show that no shock wave occurs in the mixing section when the back pressure is small, but with the back pressure increasing, the pressure undergoes a dramatic increase in the throat tube, and the shock wave position moves towards the inlet of the mixing section. Due to the complexity of shock wave characteristics, it is necessary to conduct a more in-depth study of shock wave characteristics in the mixing section to determine more detailed boundary conditions for shock wave generation.

13 April 2026 in Processes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZLZefeng Li
Zefeng Li
LCLong Chai
Long Chai
YZYi ning Zhou
Yi ning Zhou
JLJianping Lan
Jianping Lan
ZZZhang Zhang
Zhang Zhang
Linghong TangLinghong Tang
Linghong Tang
During the CO2 fracturing of unconventional oil and gas resources, the structural and operational parameters significantly influence the fracturing effectiveness. To quantitatively reveal the influence mechanisms of key parameters on the CO2 jet flow field through perforations, this study employed computational fluid dynamics (CFD) via Ansys Fluent to simulate and compare the effects of the nozzle contraction angle, injection rate, confining pressure, and fluid temperature. The results indicate that the contraction angles and injection rates have a more significant influence on the jet temperature, pressure, and velocity than the confining pressures and fluid temperatures. As the contraction angle increases, the average velocity of the jet core region increases by 5.0% (with the most significant growth at 35°), and the length of the potential core increases correspondingly. The flow through the perforations is characterized by an instantaneous drop of 2.5 °C in temperature and 2.7 MPa in pressure, then transitions to a regime of temperature recovery and dynamical pressure decay along the fracture. Increasing the fracturing displacement raises the maximum jet velocity to 104.7 m/s (an average increase of 15.5%), extends the potential core length, and amplifies the temperature and pressure drops across the perforation from 1.1 °C and 1.2 MPa to 4.2 °C and 4.8 MPa, respectively. Conversely, higher confining pressure reduces the average jet velocity by 4.3%, shortens the potential core, and diminishes the perforation temperature and pressure drops from 5 °C and 3 MPa to 2 °C and 2.5 MPa. In contrast, elevating the fluid temperature increases the jet velocity by an average of 6.3% but exerts minimal influence on the potential core length; the temperature drop at the perforation remains at approximately 2 °C, while the pressure drop rises from 2.2 MPa to 2.9 MPa. Collectively, both the confining pressure and fluid temperature significantly affect the density and velocity characteristics of the jet. An increase in confining pressure enhances the density of the CO2 jet fluid, which may potentially improve the fracturing impact in actual engineering applications. Quantitatively, the influence of each parameter on the temperature, pressure, and velocity of the CO2 jet is ranked from the most significant to the least as follows: nozzle contraction angle > fracturing injection displacement > formation confining pressure > fluid temperature. The findings of this research have direct implications for practical application, informing the optimization of the fracturing design to achieve greater efficiency and lower risk in CO2 fracturing operations.