G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent one of the most functionally diverse classes of transmembrane proteins. GPCRs and their associated signaling systems have been linked to nearly every physiological process. They also constitute nearly 40% of the current pharmacopeia as direct targets of remedial therapies. Hence, their place as a functional nexus in the interface between physiological and pathophysiological processes suggests that GPCRs may play a central role in the generation of nearly all types of human disease. Perhaps one mechanism through which GPCRs can mediate this pivotal function is through the control of the molecular aging process. It is now appreciated that, indeed, many human disorders/diseases are induced by GPCR signaling processes linked to pathological aging. Here we discuss one such novel member of the GPCR family, GPR19, that may represent an important new target for novel remedial strategies for the aging process. The molecular signaling pathways (metabolic control, circadian rhythm regulation and stress responsiveness) associated with this recently characterized receptor suggest an important role in aging-related disease etiology.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) play a significant role in controlling biological paradigms such as aging and aging-related disease. We have previously identified receptor signaling systems that are specifically associated with controlling molecular pathologies associated with the aging process. Here, we have identified a pseudo-orphan GPCR, G protein-coupled receptor 19 (GPR19), that is sensitive to many molecular aspects of the aging process. Through an in-depth molecular investigation process that involved proteomic, molecular biological, and advanced informatic experimentation, this study found that the functionality of GPR19 is specifically linked to sensory, protective, and remedial signaling systems associated with aging-related pathology. This study suggests that the activity of this receptor may play a role in mitigating the effects of aging-related pathology by promoting protective and remedial signaling systems. GPR19 expression variation demonstrates variability in the molecular activity in this larger process. At low expression levels in HEK293 cells, GPR19 expression regulates signaling paradigms linked with stress responses and metabolic responses to these. At higher expression levels, GPR19 expression co-regulates systems involved in sensing and repairing DNA damage, while at the highest levels of GPR19 expression, a functional link to processes of cellular senescence is seen. In this manner, GPR19 may function as a coordinator of aging-associated metabolic dysfunction, stress response, DNA integrity management, and eventual senescence.

Background: In the last decade, the importance of DNA methylation in the functioning of the central nervous system has been highlighted through associations between methylation changes and differential expression of key genes involved in aging and neurodegenerative diseases. In frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), aberrant methylation has been reported in causal disease genes including GRN and C9orf72; however, the genome-wide contribution of epigenetic changes to the development of FTLD remains largely unexplored. Methods: We performed reduced representation bisulfite sequencing of matched pairs of post-mortem tissue from frontal cortex (FCX) and cerebellum (CER) from pathologically confirmed FTLD patients with TDP-43 pathology (FTLD-TDP) further divided into five subtypes and including both sporadic and genetic forms (N = 25 pairs per group), and neuropathologically normal controls (N = 42 pairs). Case-control differential methylation analyses were performed, both at the individual CpG level, and in regions of grouped CpGs (differentially methylated regions; DMRs), either including all genomic locations or only gene promoters. Gene Ontology (GO) analyses were then performed using all differentially methylated genes in each group of sporadic patients. Finally, additional datasets were queried to prioritize candidate genes for follow-up. Results: Using the largest FTLD-TDP DNA methylation dataset generated to date, we identified thousands of differentially methylated CpGs (FCX = 6,520; CER = 7,134) and several hundred DMRs in FTLD-TDP brains (FCX = 134; CER = 219). Of these, less than 10% are shared between pathological subgroups. Combining additional datasets, we identified, validated and replicated hypomethylation of CAMTA1 in TDP-A potentially also impacting additional genes in the locus. GO analysis further implicated DNA methylation in myelination and developmental processes, as well as important disease-relevant mechanisms with subtype specificity such as protein phosphorylation and DNA damage repair in TDP-A, cholesterol biosynthesis in TDP-B, and protein localization in TDP-C. Conclusions: We identify methylation changes in all FTLD-TDP patient groups and show that most changes are unique to a specific pathological FTLD-TDP subtype, suggesting that these subtypes not only have distinct transcriptomic and genetic signatures, but are also epigenetically distinct. Our study constitutes an invaluable resource to the community and highlights the need for further studies to profile additional epigenetic layers within each FTLD-TDP pathological subtype.