Studies of the last two decades have demonstrated the presence in astrocytic cell membranes of N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors (NMDARs), albeit their apparently low abundance makes demonstration of their presence and function more difficult than of other glutamate (Glu) receptor classes residing in astrocytes. Activation of astrocytic NMDARs directly in brain slices and in acutely isolated or cultured astrocytes evokes intracellular calcium increase, by mutually unexclusive ionotropic and metabotropic mechanisms. However, other than one report on the contribution of astrocyte-located NMDARs to astrocyte-dependent modulation of presynaptic strength in the hippocampus, there is no sound evidence for the significant role of astrocytic NMDARs in astrocytic-neuronal interaction in neurotransmission, as yet. Durable exposure of astrocytic and neuronal co-cultures to NMDA has been reported to upregulate astrocytic synthesis of glutathione, and in this way to increase the antioxidative capacity of neurons. On the other hand, overexposure to NMDA decreases, by an as yet unknown mechanism, the ability of cultured astrocytes to express glutamine synthetase (GS), aquaporin-4 (AQP4), and the inward rectifying potassium channel Kir4.1, the three astroglia-specific proteins critical for homeostatic function of astrocytes. The beneficial or detrimental effects of astrocytic NMDAR stimulation revealed in the in vitro studies remain to be proven in the in vivo setting.

Astrocytes express N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor (NMDAR) but its functions in these cells are not well defined. This study shows that the sustained exposure (8–72 h) of mouse astrocytes to NMDA decreases the expression of the functional astroglia-specific proteins, glutamine synthetase (GS), and the water channel protein aquaporin-4 (AQP4) and also reduces GS activity. Similar to rat astrocytes (Obara-Michlewska et al. Neurochem Int 88:20–25, 2015), the exposure of mouse astrocytes to NMDA also decreased the expression of the inward rectifying potassium channel Kir4.1. NMDA failed to elicit the effects in those cells incubated in the absence of Ca²⁺ and in those in which the GluN1 subunit of the NMDAR was silenced with GluN1 siRNA. The downregulation of GS, AQP4, and Kir4.1 observed in vitro may reflect NMDAR-mediated alterations of astrocytic functions noted in central nervous system pathologies associated with increased glutamate (Glu) release and excitotoxic tissue damage.

The term epileptogenesis defines the usually durable process of converting normal brain into an epileptic one. The resistance of a significant proportion of patients with epilepsy to the available pharmacotherapy prompted the concept of a causative treatment option consisting in stopping or modifying the progress of epileptogenesis. Most antiepileptic drugs possess only a weak or no antiepileptogenic potential at all, but a few of them appear promising in this regard; these include, for example, eslicarbazepine (a sodium and T-type channel blocker), lamotrigine (a sodium channel blocker and glutamate antagonist) or levetiracetam (a ligand of synaptic vehicle protein SV2A). Among the approved non-antiepileptic drugs, antiepileptogenic potential seems to reside in losartan (a blocker of angiotensin II type 1 receptors), biperiden (an antiparkinsonian drug), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antioxidative drugs and minocycline (a second-generation tetracycline with anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties). Among other possible antiepileptogenic compounds, antisense nucleotides have been considered, among these an antagomir targeting microRNA-134. The drugs and agents mentioned above have been evaluated in post-status epilepticus models of epileptogenesis, so their preventive efficacy must be verified. Limited clinical data indicate that biperiden in patients with brain injuries is well-tolerated and seems to reduce the incidence of post-traumatic epilepsy. Exceptionally, in this regard, our own original data presented here point to c-Fos as an early seizure duration, but not seizure intensity-related, marker of early epileptogenesis. Further research of reliable markers of early epileptogenesis is definitely needed to improve the process of designing adequate antiepileptogenic therapies.