Jill Koshiol

Dr. Jill Koshiol

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 May 2008 in American Journal of Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Jill KoshiolJill Koshiol
Jill Koshiol
LLLisa Lindsay
Lisa Lindsay
JPJeanne M. Pimenta
Jeanne M. Pimenta
CPCharles Poole
Charles Poole
DJDavid Jenkins
David Jenkins
JSJennifer S. Smith
Jennifer S. Smith
Detection of persistent cervical carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA is used as a marker for cervical cancer risk in clinical trials. The authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between persistent HPV DNA and high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2-3), high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL), and invasive cervical cancer (together designated CIN2-3/HSIL+) to evaluate the robustness of HPV persistence for clinical use. MEDLINE and Current Contents were searched through January 30, 2006. Relative risks (RRs) were stratified by HPV comparison group. Of 2,035 abstracts, 41 studies were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Over 22,500 women were included in calculation of RRs for persistent HPV DNA detection and cervical neoplasia. RRs ranged from 1.3 (95% confidence interval: 1.1, 1.5) to 813.0 (95% confidence interval: 168.2, 3,229.2) for CIN2-3/HSIL+ versus 12 months), wider testing intervals, CIN2-3/HSIL+, and use of an HPV-negative reference group were consistently associated with higher RRs. Thus, HPV persistence was consistently and strongly associated with CIN2-3/HSIL+, despite wide variation in definitions and study methods. The magnitude of association varied by duration of persistence and testing interval. Precise definition and standardization of HPV testing, sampling procedure, and test interval are needed for reliable clinical testing. These findings validate HPV persistence as a clinical marker and endpoint.

1 April 2010 in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Jill KoshiolJill Koshiol
Jill Koshiol
EWEna Wang
Ena Wang
YZYingdong Zhao
Yingdong Zhao
FMFrancesco Marincola
Francesco Marincola
MLMaria Teresa Landi
Maria Teresa Landi
Background: MicroRNAs (miR) are endogenous, noncoding RNAs involved in many cellular processes and have been associated with the development and progression of cancer. There are many different ways to evaluate miRs. Methods: We described some of the most commonly used and promising miR detection methods. Results: Each miR detection method has benefits and limitations. Microarray profiling and quantitative real-time reverse-transcription PCR are the two most common methods to evaluate miR expression. However, the results from microarray and quantitative real-time reverse-transcription PCR do not always agree. High-throughput, high-resolution next-generation sequencing of small RNAs may offer the opportunity to quickly and accurately discover new miRs and confirm the presence of known miRs in the near future. Conclusions: All of the current and new technologies have benefits and limitations to consider when designing miR studies. Results can vary across platforms, requiring careful and critical evaluation when interpreting findings. Impact: Although miR detection and expression analyses are rapidly improving, there are still many technical challenges to overcome. The old molecular epidemiology tenet of rigorous biomarker validation and confirmation in independent studies remains essential. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 19(4); 907–11. ©2010 AACR.

8 October 2009 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Jill KoshiolJill Koshiol
Jill Koshiol
MRMelissa Rotunno
Melissa Rotunno
DCDario Consonni
Dario Consonni
APAngela Cecilia Pesatori
Angela Cecilia Pesatori
SMSara De Matteis
Sara De Matteis
NCNeil E. Caporaso
Neil E. Caporaso
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has been consistently associated with increased risk of lung cancer. However, previous studies have had limited ability to determine whether the association is due to smoking. The Environment And Genetics in Lung cancer Etiology (EAGLE) population-based case-control study recruited 2100 cases and 2120 controls, of whom 1934 cases and 2108 controls reported about diagnosis of chronic bronchitis, emphysema, COPD (chronic bronchitis and/or emphysema), or asthma more than 1 year before enrollment. We estimated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using logistic regression. After adjustment for smoking, other previous lung diseases, and study design variables, lung cancer risk was elevated among individuals with a history of chronic bronchitis (OR = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.5–2.5), emphysema (OR = 1.9, 95% CI = 1.4–2.8), or COPD (OR = 2.5, 95% CI = 2.0–3.1). Among current smokers, association between chronic bronchitis and lung cancer was strongest among lighter smokers. Asthma was associated with a decreased risk of lung cancer in males (OR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.30–0.78). These results suggest that the associations of personal history of chronic bronchitis, emphysema, and COPD with increased risk of lung cancer are not entirely due to smoking. Inflammatory processes may both contribute to COPD and be important for lung carcinogenesis.

1 May 2021 in Journal of Hepatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CNChirag Nepal
Chirag Nepal
BZBin Zhu
Bin Zhu
COColm J. O’rourke
Colm J. O’rourke
DBDeepak Kumar Bhatt
Deepak Kumar Bhatt
DLDonghyuk Lee
Donghyuk Lee
Jill KoshiolJill Koshiol
Jill Koshiol

25 May 2019 in JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EMEmma E McGee
Emma E McGee
SJSarah S. Jackson
Sarah S. Jackson
JPJessica L Petrick
Jessica L Petrick
ADAlison L Van Dyke
Alison L Van Dyke
HAHans-Olov Adami
Hans-Olov Adami
Jill KoshiolJill Koshiol
Jill Koshiol
Tobacco and alcohol are well-established risk factors for numerous cancers, yet their relationship to biliary tract cancers remains unclear. We pooled data from 26 prospective studies to evaluate associations of cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption with biliary tract cancer risk. Study-specific hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations with smoking and alcohol consumption were calculated. Random-effects meta-analysis produced summary estimates. All statistical tests were two-sided. Over a period of 38 369 156 person-years of follow-up, 1391 gallbladder, 758 intrahepatic bile duct, 1208 extrahepatic bile duct, and 623 ampulla of Vater cancer cases were identified. Ever, former, and current smoking were associated with increased extrahepatic bile duct and ampulla of Vater cancers risk (eg, current vs never smokers HR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.34 to 2.13 and 2.22, 95% CI = 1.69 to 2.92, respectively), with dose-response effects for smoking pack-years, duration, and intensity (all Ptrend < .01). Current smoking and smoking intensity were also associated with intrahepatic bile duct cancer (eg, >40 cigarettes per day vs never smokers HR = 2.15, 95 % CI = 1.15 to 4.00; Ptrend = .001). No convincing association was observed between smoking and gallbladder cancer. Alcohol consumption was only associated with intrahepatic bile duct cancer, with increased risk for individuals consuming five or more vs zero drinks per day (HR = 2.35, 95%CI = 1.46 to 3.78; Ptrend = .04). There was evidence of statistical heterogeneity among several cancer sites, particularly between gallbladder cancer and the other biliary tract cancers. Smoking appears to increase the risk of developing all biliary tract cancers except gallbladder cancer. Alcohol may increase the risk of intrahepatic bile duct cancer. Findings highlight etiologic heterogeneity across the biliary tract.

1 August 2017 in Gastroenterology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Jill KoshiolJill Koshiol
Jill Koshiol
YGYu-Tang Gao
Yu-Tang Gao
MDMichael Dean
Michael Dean
PEPatricia Egner
Patricia Egner
CNChirag Nepal
Chirag Nepal
JGJohn Groopman
John Groopman