Zhilong Bao

Prof. Dr. Zhilong Bao


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2009 in Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
YWYi Wang
Yi Wang
ZBZhilong Bao
Zhilong Bao
YZYing Zhu
Ying Zhu
JHJian Hua
Jian Hua
Plant-pathogen interactions are known to be affected by environmental factors including temperature; however, the temperature effects have not been systematically studied in plant disease resistance. Here, we characterized the effects of a moderate increase in temperature on resistance to bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae and two viral elicitors in Arabidopsis thaliana and Nicotiana benthamiana. Both the basal and the resistance (R) gene–mediated defense responses to Pseudomonas syringae are found to be inhibited by a moderately high temperature, and hypersensitive responses induced by R genes against two viruses are also reduced by an increase of temperature. These indicate that temperature modulation of defense responses to biotrophic and hemibiotrophic pathogens might be a general phenomenon. We further investigated the roles of two small signaling molecules, salicylic acid and jasmonic acid, as well as two defense regulators, EDS1 and PAD4, in this temperature modulation. These components, though modulated by temperature or involved in temperature regulation or both, are not themselves determinants of temperature sensitivity in the defense responses analyzed. The inhibition of plant defense response by a moderately high temperature may thus be mediated by other defense signaling components or a combination of multiple factors.

22 August 2016 in Nature Plants
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SHSarah Refi Hind
Sarah Refi Hind
SSSusan R. Strickler
Susan R. Strickler
PBPatrick C. Boyle
Patrick C. Boyle
DDDiane M. Dunham
Diane M. Dunham
ZBZhilong Bao
Zhilong Bao
GMGregory B. Martin
Gregory B. Martin
Plants and animals detect the presence of potential pathogens through the perception of conserved microbial patterns by cell surface receptors. Certain solanaceous plants, including tomato, potato and pepper, detect flgII-28, a region of bacterial flagellin that is distinct from that perceived by the well-characterized FLAGELLIN-SENSING 2 receptor. Here we identify and characterize the receptor responsible for this recognition in tomato, called FLAGELLIN-SENSING 3. This receptor binds flgII-28 and enhances immune responses leading to a reduction in bacterial colonization of leaf tissues. Further characterization of FLS3 and its signalling pathway could provide new insights into the plant immune system and transfer of the receptor to other crop plants offers the potential of enhancing resistance to bacterial pathogens that have evolved to evade FLS2-mediated immunity.

3 October 2011 in The Plant Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MGMingyue Gou
Mingyue Gou
ZSZhenying Shi
Zhenying Shi
YZYing Zhu
Ying Zhu
ZBZhilong Bao
Zhilong Bao
GWGuoying Wang
Guoying Wang
JHJian Hua
Jian Hua
Summary: Disease resistance (R) proteins, as central regulators of plant immunity, are tightly regulated for effective defense responses and to prevent constitutive defense activation under non‐pathogenic conditions. Here we report the identification of an F‐box protein CPR1/CPR30 as a negative regulator of an R protein SNC1 likely through SCF (Skp1‐cullin‐F‐box) mediated protein degradation. The cpr1‐2 (cpr30‐1) loss‐of‐function mutant has constitutive defense responses, and it interacts synergistically with a gain‐of function mutant snc1‐1 and a bon1‐1 mutant where SNC1 is upregulated. The loss of SNC1 function suppresses the mutant phenotypes of cpr1‐2 and cpr1‐2 bon1‐1, while overexpression of CPR1 rescues mutant phenotypes of both bon1‐1 and snc1‐1. Furthermore, the amount of SNC1 protein is upregulated in the cpr1‐2 mutant and down‐regulated when CPR1 is overexpressed. The regulation of SNC1 by CPR1 is dependent on the 26S proteosome as a protease inhibitor MG132 stabilizes SNC1 and reverses the effect of CPR1 on SNC1. Interestingly, CPR1 is induced after infection of both virulent and avirulent pathogens similarly to the other negative defense regulator BON1. Thus, this study reveals a new mechanism in R protein regulation likely through protein degradation and suggests negative regulation as a critical component in fine control of plant immunity.

1 November 2004 in Plant Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HDHong-Ping Dong
Hong-Ping Dong
JPJianling Peng
Jianling Peng
ZBZhilong Bao
Zhilong Bao
XMXiangdong Meng
Xiangdong Meng
JBJean M. Bonasera
Jean M. Bonasera
HDHansong Dong
Hansong Dong
Ethylene (ET) signal transduction may regulate plant growth and defense, depending on which components are recruited into the pathway in response to different stimuli. We report here that the ET pathway controls both insect resistance (IR) and plant growth enhancement (PGE) in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) plants responding to harpin, a protein produced by a plant pathogenic bacterium. PGE may result from spraying plant tops with harpin or by soaking seeds in harpin solution; the latter especially enhances root growth. Plants treated similarly develop resistance to the green peach aphid (Myzus persicae). The salicylic acid pathway, although activated by harpin, does not lead to PGE and IR. By contrast, PGE and IR are induced in both wild-type plants and genotypes that have defects in salicylic acid signaling. In response to harpin, levels of jasmonic acid (JA) decrease, and the COI1 gene, which is indispensable for JA signal transduction, is not expressed in wild-type plants. However, PGE and IR are stimulated in the JA-resistant mutant jar1-1. In the wild type, PGE and IR develop coincidently with increases in ET levels and the expression of several genes essential for ET signaling. The ET receptor gene ETR1 is required because both phenotypes are arrested in the etr1-1 mutant. Consistently, inhibition of ET perception nullifies the induction of both PGE and IR. The signal transducer EIN2 is required for IR, and EIN5 is required for PGE because IR and PGE are impaired correspondingly in the ein2-1 and ein5-1 mutants. Therefore, harpin activates ET signaling while conscribing EIN2 and EIN5 to confer IR and PGE, respectively.

1 October 2004 in Phytopathology®
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JPJian-Ling Peng
Jian-Ling Peng
ZBZhilong Bao
Zhilong Bao
HRHai-Ying Ren
Hai-Ying Ren
JWJin-Sheng Wang
Jin-Sheng Wang
HDHan-Song Dong
Han-Song Dong
HarpinXoo, encoded by the hpaGXoo gene of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae, is a member of the harpin group of proteins that induce pathogen resistance and hypersensitive cell death (HCD) in plants. We elaborated whether both processes are correlated in hpaGXoo-expressing tobacco (HARTOB) plants, which produced harpinXoo intracellularly. Resistance to fungal, bacterial, and viral pathogens increased in HARTOB, in correlation with the expression of hpaGXoo, the gene NPR1 that regulates several resistance pathways, and defense genes GST1, Chia5, PR-1a, and PR-1b that are mediated by different signals. However, reactive oxygen intermediate burst, the expression of HCD marker genes hsr203 and hin1, and cell death did not occur spontaneously in HARTOB, though they did in untransformed and HARTOB plants treated exogenously with harpinXoo. Thus, the transgenic expression of harpinXoo confers nonspecific pathogen defense in the absence of HCD.

15 December 2004 in Planta
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HDHong-Ping Dong
Hong-Ping Dong
HYHaiqin Yu
Haiqin Yu
ZBZhilong Bao
Zhilong Bao
XGXiaojing Guo
Xiaojing Guo
JPJianling Peng
Jianling Peng
HDHansong Dong
Hansong Dong