Shye-Jao Wu

Dr. Shye-Jao Wu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 November 2021 in BMC Medical Education
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SWShye-Jao Wu
Shye-Jao Wu
YFYa-Fen Fan
Ya-Fen Fan
SSShen Sun
Shen Sun
CCChen-Yen Chien
Chen-Yen Chien
YWYih-Jer Wu
Yih-Jer Wu
Background: Online education has been used as an adjunct modality for teaching and it attracts attention in recent years as many medical students can not accomplish their clerkship in the hospital due to COVID-19 pandemic. This study aims to collect the articles related to online surgical education for medical students, and to analyze the effectiveness of online education and the perceptions of the medical students. Method: We performed a systemic literature search in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ERIC and Cochrane library. Keywords used for searching included “medical student”, “online education”, “online teaching”, “online learning”, “distance learning”, “electronic learning”, “virtual learning” and “surgical”. Medical education research study quality instrument (MERSQI) was used for the evaluation of the quality of the searched articles. Results: From 1240 studies retrieved from the databases, 13 articles were included in this study after screening. The publication year was from 2007 to 2021. The mean MERSQI score of the 13 searched articles was 12.5 +/− 1.7 (range 10.0-14.5). There were totally 2023 medical students who attended online surgical curriculum. By online course, improvement of understanding and knowledge on the studied topics could be reached. The confidence in patient encounters could be improved by online curriculum with sharing experiences, discussing, and role playing. However, students felt concentration was poor during online course. Medical students studying through video platform could get better test scores than those studying with textbooks. Regarding basic surgical skills, online teaching of suturing and knot-tying could be possible and was appreciated by the students who could practice away from the hospital and get feedbacks by instructors through online environment. The scores for the clinical competence assessment for incision, suturing and knot-tying were found to be no significant difference between the online teaching group and face-to-face teaching group. Conclusion: Online surgical curriculum for medical students is not easy but inevitable in the era of COVID-19 pandemic. Although online course is not the same as physical course, there are some efforts which could be tried to increase the effectiveness. Basic surgical skills could also be taught effectively through online platform. Even if the COVID-19 pandemic is over in the future, online curriculum could still be a helpful adjunct for surgical education.

1 December 2021 in Asian Journal of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SSShen Sun
Shen Sun
CCChen-Yen Chien
Chen-Yen Chien
YFYa-Fen Fan
Ya-Fen Fan
SWShye-Jao Wu
Shye-Jao Wu
JLJiun-Yi Li
Jiun-Yi Li
KHKung-Hong Hsu
Kung-Hong Hsu
For type A aortic dissection (TAAD), antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP) was proposed as a more physiological method than retrograde cerebral perfusion (RCP) for intra-operative brain protection, but it is still debatable whether antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP) or retrograde cerebral perfusion (RCP) is related to the better clinical outcome. The present study was undertaken to compare the results in our patients receiving surgery for TAAD with ACP or RCP. The primary aim of this study was focused on the incidence of and the factors associated with surgical mortality, post-operative neurological outcomes and long-term survival. From February 2001 to March 2019, there were 223 consecutive patients with TAAD treated surgically at our hospital. The median age at presentation was 56 years (range 29-88 years) and 70 patients (31.4%) over 65 years of age. There were 168 patients treated with RCP and 55 patients treated with ACP. The primary endpoints were surgical mortality and neurological outcome. Propensity score matching was used to compare the treatment results of surgeries with RCP or ACP. The long-term survival was also analyzed. The overall in-hospital mortality rate and the overall 30-day mortality rate were 15.6% and 14.3% respectively. For the patients without pre-operative shock (n = 184), the in-hospital mortality rate was 10.3% and the 30-day mortality rate was 8.7% and higher long-term survival rates (88.3% for 5 years, 86.5% for 10 years, 86.5% for 15 years) were documented for this patient group. There was no significant difference on the surgical mortality between the ACP group and the RCP group. In the entire cohort, there were 23 patients (10.3%) who suffered from post-operative neurological deficits (PND) and there were less PND for the patients with RCP than the patients with ACP (7.7% vs 18.1%, p = 0.027). After propensity score matching, there was still higher incidence of PND in the ACP group than in the RCP group but without statistical significance (18.5% vs 11.1%, p = 0.279). Aortic surgery carries high risk for the patients with TAAD and PND is not an unusual post-operative morbidity. In our series, pre-operative shock, pre-operative CPR, CRI, past history with CAD are related to higher surgical mortality. The younger patients (<65 years old) without pre-operative shock got better surgical outcome and long-term survival. RCP could provide acceptable cerebral protection during aortic surgery for the TAAD patients. Old age, pre-operative shock, CRI and past history of CAD are independent risk factors for long-term survival.

1 October 2024 in Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SWShye-Jao Wu
Shye-Jao Wu
SSShen Sun
Shen Sun
YTYu-Hern Tan
Yu-Hern Tan
CCChen-Yen Chien
Chen-Yen Chien
Some patients with an infective native aortic aneurysm (INAA) develop an aortic vascular graft or endograft infection (VGEI) even after successful open surgical repair or endovascular intervention. The aim of the systematic review and meta-analysis performed herein was to compare the clinical outcomes of different surgical and antibiotic treatment strategies. We systematically searched PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science. The keywords used for the search were “mycotic aortic aneurysm”, “infected aortic aneurysm”, “infective native aortic aneurysm”, “antibiotics”, “surgery”, and “endovascular”. The search was limited to articles written in English and to studies involving humans. Articles published before 2000 were excluded. Case reports and review articles were excluded. Of the 524 studies retrieved from our search of the databases, 47 articles were included in this study. Among the 47 articles (1546 patients, 72.8% of whom were male) retrieved, five articles were excluded from the subgroup analysis because the data concerning open surgical repair and endovascular intervention could not be separated. The remaining 42 articles included a total of 1179 patients who underwent open surgical repair (622 patients) or endovascular intervention (557 patients) for INAA. There was a statistically significant difference (p = 0.001) in the pooled in-hospital mortality rate between the open surgical repair group (13.2%, 82/622) and the endovascular intervention group (7.2%, 40/557). However, there was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) in the aortic VGEI rate between the open surgical repair group (5.4%). 29/540) and endovascular intervention (13.3%, 69/517) group. For patients who underwent open surgical repair, a lower rate of aortic vascular graft infection was associated with long-term antibiotic use (p = 0.005). For patients who underwent endovascular intervention, there was a trend of association (p = 0.071) between the lower rate of aortic endograft infection and lifelong antibiotic use. Infective native aortic aneurysms are life-threatening. The pooled in-hospital mortality rate of the open surgical repair group was significantly higher than that of the endovascular intervention group, whereas the rate of the aortic VGEI in the open surgical repair group was significantly lower than that in the endovascular intervention group. Regardless of whether open surgical repair or endovascular intervention is performed, better long-term outcomes can be achieved with aggressive antibiotic treatment, which is especially important for patients who undergo endovascular intervention.

1 January 2022 in Asian Journal of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SWShye-Jao Wu
Shye-Jao Wu
YFYa-Fen Fan
Ya-Fen Fan
CCChen-Yen Chien
Chen-Yen Chien
The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AFib) in adult patients with atrial septal defect (ASD) who did not undergo ASD repair in the childhood is higher than that in general population. The primary aim of this study is to collect various related articles published in the literature and to compare the clinical outcomes with different treatment strategies by systemic reviews and meta-analyses. Of the 1299 initially screened articles, 13 studies with 213 patients were included in this study. All the patients were adults and the mean age at presentation was 55.7 years (range 34-79 years) and 47.8% of the patients were male. Regarding the types of the AFib, there were paroxysmal AFib in 62 patients, persistent AFib in 40 patients and long-standing persistent AFib in 111 patients. For adult patients with ASD and AFib, ASD closure is beneficial for most of the patients if significant left-to-right shunt exists but risk stratification cannot be overlooked because worsening of the functional class may be experienced by some patients post-operatively, especially for the patients with advanced age (>75 years). Reduction of prevalence of AFib could be observed after ASD closure alone which is mainly effective for paroxysmal AFib but not for persistent or long-standing persistent AFib. The successful ablation rate of paroxysmal AFib by catheter ablation is similar to that of all kinds of AFib by surgical ablation. Regarding AFib recurrence, bi-atrial surgical ablation is better than right-atrial ablation for the adult patients with ASD and AFib.

29 November 2021 in International Heart Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SWShye-Jao Wu
Shye-Jao Wu
YFYa-Fen Fan
Ya-Fen Fan
CCChen-Yen Chien
Chen-Yen Chien
Catheter ablation is a treatment modality which has been increasingly used for cardiac arrhythmias. However, it is not complication-free, and cardiac perforation is one of its most life-threatening complications. As surgery is usually not the first-line treatment for this emergent episode, there were only very few sporadic surgical reports in the literature. This systemic review primarily aims to collect different surgical approaches for catheter-induced cardiac perforation to help surgeons manage this kind of uncommon and critical patients. Of the 452 initially screened articles, 22 studies (38 patients) were included in the systemic review. Of all the included patients, 84% (32/38) were found to have pericardial effusion acutely following catheter-related procedures, and 16% (6/38) experienced delayed-onset episodes. Regarding the surgical procedures, four patients underwent removal of clots only, eight patients underwent suture repair of the left ventricle (LV), nine patients underwent suture repair of the right ventricle (RV), five patients underwent suture repair of the LA, and four patients underwent sutureless repair of the LV and pulmonary vein (LV 1, RV 1, pulmonary vein 1). In addition to repair of perforation sites, the concomitant combined procedures included repair of intercostal vessels (complication of pericardiocentesis) for one patient, cryoablation for two patients, and maze procedure for one patient. For cardiac perforation following catheter ablation or electrophysiology study, although the majority of the patients are treated with pericardiocentesis and medical management at first, cardiovascular surgeons have to prepare to take over if the bleeding is persistent or if the cardiac tamponade is not relieved.

14 March 2020 in Asian Journal of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SWShye-Jao Wu
Shye-Jao Wu
YFYa-Fen Fan
Ya-Fen Fan
YTYu-Hern Tan
Yu-Hern Tan
MCMing-Ren Chen
Ming-Ren Chen
SSShen Sun
Shen Sun
ICIng-Sh Chiu
Ing-Sh Chiu
Background: Interrupted aortic arch (IAA) is a rare congenital cardiac anomaly, which necessitates surgical treatment. There are several surgical strategies for corrective repair of IAA, such as one-stage repair, rapid two-stage repair and two-stage repair. Here, we reported our surgical result of staged-repair policy for the patients with IAA. Method: From November 2003 to July 2015, there were 14 patients (8 boys, 6 girls) with IAA treated by us. Except one teenager patient, we routinely used intravenous infusion of prostaglandin E1 for all the infant patients (n = 13) to keep adequate end organ perfusion before the first surgical intervention. Surgical repair was performed after the perfusion of end organs recovered. Result: Two patients (1 teenager and 1 infant with one-stage surgery) were excluded from this study. At the time of the first surgery, we did the first-stage surgery with anastomosis in between aortic arch and descending aorta, division of patent ductus arteriosus and banding of pulmonary trunk through left thoracotomy. The overall surgical survival rate of the first surgery was 100% (12/12). At the time of the second surgery, corrective repair was done under cardiopulmonary bypass through median sternotomy. The surgical survival rate of the corrective surgery was also 100%. There is no late death during follow-up for 9 years (range 4.2–15.0 years). Conclusion: Out of several surgical strategies for the infants with IAA, staged repair still could be a treatment option to achieve satisfied surgical result.