Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) is an effective treatment for post-stroke spasticity; however, some patients cannot access treatment until ≥1 year post-stroke. This Brazilian post-marketing study (NCT02390206) assessed the achievement of person-centered goals in patients with chronic post-stroke spasticity after a BoNT-A injection. Patients had a last documented stroke ≥1 year before study entry and post-stroke upper limb (UL) spasticity, with or without lower limb (LL) spasticity. Patients received BoNT-A injections at baseline (visit 1) and visit 2 (3–6 months). Primary endpoint was responder rate (achievement of primary goal from Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS)) at visit 2. Overall, 204 patients underwent GAS evaluation at visit 2, mean (SD) age was 56.4 (13.2) years and 90.7% had LL spasticity. Median (range) time between first stroke and onset of spasticity was 3.6 (0−349) months, onset of spasticity and first injection was 22.7 (0−350) months and waiting time for a rehabilitation appointment was 9.0 (1−96) months. At visit 2, 61.3% (95% CI: 54.4, 67.7) of patients were responders, which was similar for UL and LL primary goals (57.8% [95% CI: 49.9, 65.3] vs. 64.1% [95% CI: 48.4, 77.3]). This study provides evidence to support the effectiveness of BoNT-A treatment for chronic post-stroke spasticity.

Botulinum toxin type A is approved for the focal treatment of spasticity; however, the effectiveness of abobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A) in patients with shoulder pain who have set reduced pain as a treatment goal is understudied. In addition, some patients encounter delays in accessing treatment programs; therefore, the suitability of aboBoNT-A for pain reduction in this population requires investigation. These factors were assessed in aboBoNT-A-naive Brazilian patients in a post hoc analysis of data from BCause, an observational, multicenter, prospective study (NCT02390206). Patients (N = 49, n = 25 female; mean (standard deviation) age of 60.3 (9.1) years; median (range) time since onset of spasticity of 16.1 (0–193) months) received aboBoNT-A injections to shoulder muscles in one or two treatment cycles (n = 47). Using goal attainment scaling (GAS), most patients achieved their goal of shoulder pain reduction after one treatment cycle (72.1%; 95% confidence interval: 57.2–83.4%). Improvements in GAS T-score from baseline, clinically meaningful reductions in pain score at movement, and clinically meaningful increases in passive shoulder abduction angle further improved with repeated treatment more than 4 months later, despite treatment starting at a median of 16.1 months after the onset of spasticity. These findings support the further investigation of aboBoNT-A injections in chronic post-stroke shoulder pain.

Background/Objectives: Cerebral palsy (CP) is a non-progressive, permanent syndrome of childhood, with approximately 80% of patients exhibiting spasticity. Untreated spasticity can cause pain, structural changes in bones, muscles, and nerves negatively impacting quality of life and functionality. Photobiomodulation (PBM) has demonstrated biological effects such as tissue regeneration, muscle relaxation, inflammation reduction, and pain relief. The objective of this pilot study is to evaluate the action of PBM on the spasticity of the medial and lateral right gastrocnemius muscles of children and adolescents with spastic cerebral palsy. Methods: This single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial evaluated PBM’s effect on gastrocnemius spasticity in children and adolescents with CP. The study presents pilot preliminary results from twelve children and adolescents (7–16 years) with spastic CP who were randomized into two groups: active PBM (850 nm, 100 mW, 1.5 J/point, 2 points, weekly for 8 weeks) or placebo (same protocol, device off). Both groups received standard rehabilitation exercises. Outcomes were assessed using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI), Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), and ankle range of motion before and after the intervention (8 weeks). Results: MAS and all outcomes improved significantly over time in both groups. No significant differences were found between groups for all outcomes. The PBM effect size on MAS improvement (ANOVA, Analysis of Vari, η² = 0.171) suggests modest but positive benefits. PBM did not worsen spasticity, and no adverse effects were reported. Conclusion: This study represents a pioneering effort in evaluating a safe PBM protocol for the spastics gastrocnemius in children and adolescents with CP. This protocol, used as an adjunct to physiotherapy, demonstrated no short-term adverse effects and no participant dropouts. Future studies should explore this PBM protocol in patients with less severe GMFCS levels, those with minimally preserved functionality, or those with contraindications to physiotherapeutic exercises.

Introduction Obesity has become a worldwide public health problem and is directly linked to loss of quality of life, complications and comorbidities. One of them is chronic pain, especially in the knees, which increases significantly and proportionally with weight gain. In patients with severe obesity, with indication for bariatric surgery, the presence of chronic pain disables and often prevents their participation in a pre-surgical rehabilitation programme. As an analgesic therapy, photobiomodulation (PBM) has been studied with safety, efficacy, well-tolerated used and low costs. Thus, this study aims to evaluate the use of PBM for the treatment of chronic knee pain in obese patients undergoing a pre-surgical rehabilitation programme for bariatric surgery. Methods and analyses This is a double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical, superiority, trial protocol. The PBM will be applied in bilateral knees and lumbar paraspinal points levels referring to the roots of innervation of the knee. The outcomes evaluated will be pain intensity, functionality, quality of life and clinical signs of neurological sensitization of chronic knee pain pathways. Ethics and dissemination This protocol has already been approved by the Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa do Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Goiás/EBSERH—Ethics Committee and it is following SPIRIT guidelines. The results will be statistically analysed and subsequently published in peer-reviewed journals. Trial registration number Clinical Trials Platform (https://clinicaltrials.gov/) with the number NCT05816798.