Patrice Desmeules

Dr. Patrice Desmeules


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 January 2021 in Current Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DBD. Gwyn Bebb
D. Gwyn Bebb
SBShantanu Banerji
Shantanu Banerji
NBNormand Blais
Normand Blais
PDPatrice Desmeules
Patrice Desmeules
Sharlene GillSharlene Gill
Sharlene Gill
MTMing Tsao
Ming Tsao
The tyrosine receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors larotrectinib and entrectinib were recently approved in Canada for the treatment of solid tumours harbouring neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions. These NTRK gene fusions are oncogenic drivers found in most tumour types at a low frequency (80%) in a small number of rare tumours (e.g., secretory carcinoma of the salivary gland and of the breast). They are generally mutually exclusive of other common oncogenic drivers. Larotrectinib and entrectinib have demonstrated impressive overall response rates and tolerability in Phase I/II trials in patients with TRK fusion cancer with no other effective treatment options. Given the low frequency of TRK fusion cancer and the heterogeneous molecular testing landscape in Canada, identifying and optimally managing such patients represents a new challenge. We provide a Canadian consensus on when and how to test for NTRK gene fusions and when to consider treatment with a TRK inhibitor. We focus on five tumour types: thyroid carcinoma, colorectal carcinoma, non-small cell lung carcinoma, soft tissue sarcoma, and salivary gland carcinoma. Based on the probability of the tumour harbouring an NTRK gene fusion, we also suggest a tumour-agnostic consensus for NTRK gene fusion testing and treatment. We recommend considering a TRK inhibitor in all patients with TRK fusion cancer with no other effective treatment options.

16 July 2019 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HMHanane Moussa
Hanane Moussa
MNMolière Nguile-Makao
Molière Nguile-Makao
KRKarine Robitaille
Karine Robitaille
MGMarie-Hélène Guertin
Marie-Hélène Guertin
JAJanie Allaire
Janie Allaire
VFVincent Fradet
Vincent Fradet
Dietary omega-3 fatty acids (ω3), particularly long-chain ω3 (LCω3), have protective effects against prostate cancer (PCa) in experimental studies. Observational studies are conflicting, possibly because of the biomarker used. This study aimed at evaluating associations between grade reclassification and ω3 levels assessed in prostatic tissue, red blood cells (RBC), and diet. We conducted a validation cross-sectional study nested within a phase II clinical trial. We identified 157 men diagnosed with low-risk PCa who underwent a first active surveillance repeat prostate biopsy session. Fatty acid (FA) intake was assessed using a food frequency questionnaire and their levels measured in prostate tissue and RBC. Associations were evaluated using logistic regression. At first repeat biopsy session, 39 (25%) men had high-grade PCa (grade group ≥2). We found that high LCω3-eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) level in prostate tissue (odds ratio (OR) 0.25; 95% (confidence interval (CI) 0.08–0.79; p-trend = 0.03) was associated with lower odds of high-grade PCa. Similar results were observed for LCω3 dietary intake (OR 0.30; 95% CI 0.11-0.83; p-trend = 0.02) but no association for RBC. LCω3-EPA levels in the target prostate tissue are inversely associated with high-grade PCa in men with low-risk PCa, supporting that prostate tissue FA, but not RBC FA, is a reliable biomarker of PCa risk.

10 April 2023 in American Journal of Surgical Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
YBYohan Bossé
Yohan Bossé
AGAndréanne Gagné
Andréanne Gagné
WAWajd Althakfi
Wajd Althakfi
MOMichele Orain
Michele Orain
CCChristian Md Couture
Christian Md Couture
Philippe JoubertPhilippe Joubert
Philippe Joubert
Tumor grading enables better management of patients and treatment options. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) Pathology Committee has recently released a 3-tier grading system for invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma consisting of predominant histologic patterns plus a cutoff of 20% of high-grade components including solid, micropapillary, and complex glandular patterns. The goal of this study was to validate the prognostic value of the new IASLC grading system and to compare its discriminatory performance to the predominant pattern–based grading system and a simplified version of the IASLC grading system without complex glandular patterns. This was a single-site retrospective study based on a 20-year data collection of patients that underwent lung cancer surgery. All invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas confirmed by the histologic review were evaluated in a discovery cohort (n=676) and a validation cohort (n=717). The median duration of follow-up in the combined dataset (n=1393) was 7.5 years. The primary outcome was overall survival after surgery. The 3 grading systems had strong and relatively similar predictive performance, but the best parsimonious model was the simplified IASLC grading system (log-rank P=1.39E−13). The latter was strongly associated with survival in the validation set (P=1.1E−18) and the combined set (P=5.01E−35). We observed a large proportion of patients upgraded to the poor prognosis group using the IASLC grading system, which was attenuated when using the simplified IASLC grading system. In conclusion, we identified a histologic simpler classification for invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas that outperformed the recently proposed IASLC grading system. A simplified grading system is clinically convenient and will facilitate widespread implementation.

10 January 2022 in JTO Clinical and Research Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDPatrice Desmeules
Patrice Desmeules
DBDominique K. Boudreau
Dominique K. Boudreau
NBNathalie Bastien
Nathalie Bastien
MBMarie-Chloé Boulanger
Marie-Chloé Boulanger
YBYohan Bossé
Yohan Bossé
CCChristian Couture
Christian Couture
With its expanding list of approved and emerging therapeutic indications, NSCLC is the exemplar tumor type requiring upfront assessment of several biomarkers to guide clinical management. Next-generation sequencing allows identification of different types of molecular alterations, each with specific analytical challenges. Library preparation using parallel DNA and RNA workflows can overcome most of them, but it increases complexity of laboratory operations, turnaround time, and costs. We describe the performance characteristics of a 15-gene RNA panel on the basis of anchored multiplex polymerase chain reaction for combined detection of clinically relevant oncogenic fusion transcripts and hotspot small variants. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded NSCLC clinical samples (N = 58) were used along cell lines and commercial controls to validate the assay’s analytical performance, followed by an exploratory prospective cohort (N = 87). The raw assay sensitivity for hotspot mutations and fusions was 83% and 93%, respectively, reaching 100% after filtering for key assay metrics. Those include quantity and quality of input of nucleic acid and sequencing metric from primers on housekeeping genes included in the assay. In the prospective cohort, driver alterations were identified in most cases (≥58%). This ultrafocused RNA–next-generation sequencing assay offers an advantageous option with single unified workflow for simultaneous detection of clinically relevant hotspot mutations and fusions in NSCLC, focusing on actionable gene targets.

31 March 2023 in Current Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TSTracy Stockley
Tracy Stockley
BLBryan Lo
Bryan Lo
ABAdrian Box
Adrian Box
ACAndrea Liliam Gomez Corredor
Andrea Liliam Gomez Corredor
DJDeCoteau John
DeCoteau John
MTMing Tsao
Ming Tsao
The detection of gene fusions by RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) is an emerging method in clinical genetic laboratories for oncology biomarker testing to direct targeted therapy selections. A recent Canadian study (CANTRK study) comparing the detection of NTRK gene fusions on different NGS assays to determine subjects’ eligibility for tyrosine kinase TRK inhibitor therapy identified the need for recommendations for best practices for laboratory testing to optimize RNA-based NGS gene fusion detection. To develop consensus recommendations, representatives from 17 Canadian genetic laboratories participated in working group discussions and the completion of survey questions about RNA-based NGS. Consensus recommendations are presented for pre-analytic, analytic and reporting aspects of gene fusion detection by RNA-based NGS.

9 November 2021 in Current Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PCParneet K. Cheema
Parneet K. Cheema
SBShantanu Banerji
Shantanu Banerji
NBNormand Blais
Normand Blais
QCQuincy Chu
Quincy Chu
PDPatrice Desmeules
Patrice Desmeules
BMBarbara Melosky
Barbara Melosky
In Canada, the therapeutic management of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with rare actionable mutations differs between provinces, territories, and individual centres based on access to molecular testing and funded treatments. These variations, together with the emergence of several novel mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) factor-targeted therapies for the treatment of NSCLC, warrant the development of evidence-based consensus recommendations for the use of these agents. A Canadian expert panel was convened to define key clinical questions, review evidence, discuss practice recommendations and reach consensus on the treatment of advanced MET-altered NSCLC. Questions addressed by the panel include: 1. How should the patients most likely to benefit from MET-targeted therapies be identified? 2. What are the preferred first-line and subsequent therapies for patients with MET exon 14 skipping mutations? 3. What are the preferred first-line and subsequent therapies for advanced NSCLC patients with de novo MET amplification? 4. What is the preferred therapy for patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated NSCLC with acquired MET amplification progressing on EGFR inhibitors? 5. What are the potential strategies for overcoming resistance to MET inhibitors? Answers to these questions, along with the consensus recommendations herein, will help streamline the management of MET-altered NSCLC in routine practice, assist clinicians in therapeutic decision-making, and help ensure optimal outcomes for NSCLC patients with MET alterations.