The tumor promoter 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) can trigger growth inhibition, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)–like cell scattering, and migration of hepatoma cells HepG2 in a protein kinase C-α (PKC-α)–dependent manner. Saikosaponin a, an ingredient of antitumorigenic Chinese herb Sho-Saiko-to, inhibited cell growth but did not induce EMT-like cell scattering and cell migration of HepG2. Saikosaponin a and TPA induced transient (for 30 minutes) and sustained (until 6 hours) phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), respectively. Generation of the reactive oxygen species (ROS) was induced by TPA, but not saikosaponin a, for 3 hours. As expected, scavengers of ROS, such as superoxide dismutase, catalase, and mannitol, and the thiol-containing antioxidant N-acetylcystein dramatically suppressed the TPA-triggered cell migration but not growth inhibition of HepG2. The generation of ROS induced by TPA was PKC, but not ERK, dependent. On the other hand, scavengers of ROS and N-acetylcystein also prevented PKC activation and ERK phosphorylation induced by TPA. On the transcriptional level, TPA can induce gene expression of integrins α₅, α₆, and β₁ and reduce gene expression of E-cahedrin in a PKC- and ROS-dependent manner. In conclusion, ROS play a central role in mediating TPA-triggered sustained PKC and ERK signaling for regulation of gene expression of integrins and E-cahedrin that are responsible for EMT and migration of HepG2. (Mol Cancer Res 2006;4(10):747–58)

The poor prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), one of the most devastating cancers worldwide, is due to frequent recurrence and metastasis. Among the metastatic factors in the tumor microenvironment, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) has been well known to play critical roles in tumor progression, including HCC. Therefore, c-Met is now regarded as the most promising therapeutic target for the treatment of HCC. However, there are still concerns about resistance and the side effects of using conventional inhibitors of c-Met, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Recently, many alternative strategies of c-Met targeting have been emerging. These include targeting the downstream effectors of c-Met, such as hydrogen peroxide-inducible clone 5 (Hic-5), to block the reactive oxygen species (ROS)-mediated signaling for HCC progression. Also, inhibition of endosomal regulators, such as PKCε and GGA3, may perturb the c-Met endosomal signaling for HCC cell migration. On the other hand, many herbal antagonists of c-Met-dependent signaling, such as saponin, resveratrol, and LZ-8, were identified. Taken together, it can be anticipated that more effective and safer c-Met targeting strategies for preventing HCC progression can be established in the future.

Snail is a multifunctional transcriptional factor that has been described as a repressor in many different contexts. It is also proposed as an activator in a few cases relevant to tumor progression and cell‐cycle arrest. This study investigated the detailed mechanisms by which Snail upregulates gene expression of the CDK inhibitor p15^INK4b in HepG2 induced by the tumor promoter tetradecanoyl phorbol acetate (TPA). Using deletion mapping, the TPA‐responsive element on the p15^INK4b promoter was located between 77 and 228 bp upstream of the transcriptional initiation site, within which the putative binding regions of early growth response gene 1 (EGR‐1) and stimulatory protein 1 (SP‐1) were found. Gene expression of EGR‐1, Snail and SP‐1 can be induced by TPA within 0.5–6 h. In addition, basal levels of SP‐1, but not of the other two transcriptional factors, were observed. Blockade of TPA‐induced gene expression of Snail, EGR‐1 or SP‐1 suppressed activation of the p15–pro228 reporter plasmid harboring the TPA‐responsive element. More detailed deletion mapping and site‐directed mutagenesis further concluded that the overlapping EGR‐1/SP‐1‐binding site was required for TPA‐induced p15–pro228 activation. In an EMSA, a DNA–protein complex was elevated by TPA, which can be blocked by antibodies against EGR‐1, SP‐1 or Snail at 6 h. Immunoprecipitation/western blotting demonstrated that TPA could trigger the association of EGR‐1 with Snail or SP‐1. Furthermore, a double chromatin immunoprecipitation assay verified that EGR‐1 could form a complex with Snail or SP‐1 on the TPA‐responsive element after treatment with TPA for 2–6 h. Finally, we demonstrated a novel Snail‐target region which could be bound by Snail and was also required for TPA‐induced p15–pro228 activation. In conclusion, Snail associates with EGR‐1 and SP‐1 to mediate TPA‐induced transcriptional upregulation of p15^INK4b in HepG2.Structured digital abstract MINT‐7384899: Snail (uniprotkb:O95863) physically interacts (MI:0915) with EGR‐1 (uniprotkb:P18146) by anti bait coimmunoprecipitation (MI:0006) MINT‐7384908: SP‐1 (uniprotkb:P08047) physically interacts (MI:0915) with EGR‐1 (uniprotkb:P18146) by anti bait coimmunoprecipitation (MI:0006)