XIAOPING XIN

Dr. XIAOPING XIN

Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Soil, Water, and Ecosystem sciences Department (SWESD), University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 October 2021 in Nanomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Fengliang ZhaoFengliang Zhao
Fengliang Zhao
XIAOPING XINXIAOPING XIN
XIAOPING XIN
YCYune Cao
Yune Cao
DSDan Su
Dan Su
PJPuhui Ji
Puhui Ji
Zhenli HeZhenli He
Zhenli He
The use of carbon nanoparticles (CNPs) as a fertilizer synergist to enhance crop growth has attracted increasing interest. However, current understanding about plant growth and soil response to CNPs is limited. In the present study, we investigated the effects of CNPs at different application rates on soil properties, the plant growth and nutrient use efficiency (NUE) of corn (Zea mays L.) in two agricultural soils (Spodosol and Alfisol). The results showed that CNPs affected corn growth in a dose-dependent manner, augmenting and retarding growth at low and at high concentrations, respectively. The amendment at the optimal rate of 200 mg CNPs kg−1 significantly enhanced corn growth as indicated by improved plant height, biomass yield, nutrient uptake and nutrient use efficiency, which could be explained by the higher availability of phosphorus and nitrogen in the amended soils. The application of CNPs largely stimulated soil urease activity irrespectively of soil types. However, the responses of dehydrogenase and phosphatase to CNPs were dose dependent; their activity significantly increased with the increasing application rates of CNPs up to 200 mg kg−1 but declined at higher rates (>400 mg kg−1). These findings have important implications in the field application of CNPs for enhancing nutrient use efficiency and crop production in tropical/subtropical regions.

10 June 2022 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XIAOPING XINXIAOPING XIN
XIAOPING XIN
JNJaya Nepal
Jaya Nepal
AWAlan L. Wright
Alan L. Wright
XYXiaoe Yang
Xiaoe Yang
Zhenli HeZhenli He
Zhenli He

29 November 2022 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XIAOPING XINXIAOPING XIN
XIAOPING XIN
JSJiali Shentu
Jiali Shentu
TZTiequan Zhang
Tiequan Zhang
XYXiaoe Yang
Xiaoe Yang
VBVirupax Baligar
Virupax Baligar
Zhenli HeZhenli He
Zhenli He
Soil pollution caused by potentially toxic metals has become a worldwide environmental issue. Geogenic processes and anthropogenic activities are two important sources of soil pollution. Soils may inherit toxic metals from parent materials; however, soil pollution mostly results from industrial and agricultural activities. Contamination by metals can be indicated by the changes in chemical, biochemical, and microbial properties of soils and plant responses. The total concentration of toxic metals in soil is still the most widely used indicator for risk assessment although extractable amounts have been reported to be more closely related to plant uptake. Several models have been proposed for assessing soil contamination by toxic metals, but none of them are commonly accepted for application to a wide range of soils. This review paper highlights how toxic metal contamination negatively affects soil and environmental quality, impacts food quality and security, and poses a threat to human health. Further research is needed to not only improve soil contamination diagnosis, modeling, and regulatory standards but also for remediation efficiency.

3 June 2025 in ACS Nano
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XWXin Wang
Xin Wang
BHBilal Hussain
Bilal Hussain
XIAOPING XINXIAOPING XIN
XIAOPING XIN
TZTong Zou
Tong Zou
XHXiwei Huang
Xiwei Huang
XYXiaoe Yang
Xiaoe Yang

24 August 2017 in European Journal of Soil Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
XIAOPING XINXIAOPING XIN
XIAOPING XIN
AWA. L. Wright
A. L. Wright
ZHZ. L. He
Z. L. He
XJXianjun Jiang
Xianjun Jiang

5 July 2024 in Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YSYidi Sun
Yidi Sun
XWXuetao Wang
Xuetao Wang
CYChenxia Yang
Chenxia Yang
XIAOPING XINXIAOPING XIN
XIAOPING XIN
Junlin ZhengJunlin Zheng
Junlin Zheng
CDChaoyin Dou
Chaoyin Dou
The paddy field is a major source of gaseous carbon and nitrogen emissions, and reducing these emissions is of great significance for mitigating greenhouse effects and non-point source pollution in farmland. Biochar, derived from agricultural waste, possesses a stable structure, large specific surface area, abundant pore structures, and surface functional groups. These characteristics could enhance soil physicochemical properties and microbial activity, thereby facilitating the dual goals of increasing crop yield and reducing emissions. Based on numerous studies, this review summarizes the effects of biochar on the emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), and ammonia volatilization (NH3), as well as on global warming potential (GWP) and greenhouse gas emission intensity (GHGI). It elucidates the mechanism of emission reduction by biochar amendment from the perspective of carbon and nitrogen conversion processes and soil physicochemical and biological properties. Numerous studies showed the application of 5~40 t ha−1 biochar reduced CO2, CH4, N2O, and NH3 emissions by 1.64~89.6%, 8.6~89.6%, 10~90%, and 12.27~53%, respectively. A small number of studies found that the application of 5~48 t ha−1 biochar increased CO2, CH4, N2O, and NH3 emissions by 12~37%, 19.85~176%, 13~84.23%, and 5.47~70.9%, respectively. Most scholars have found that biochar has varying degrees of emission reduction capabilities in different parts of the world. Therefore, future research directions have been suggested for utilizing biochar to reduce carbon and nitrogen emissions in paddy fields.