Bhopal Pandeya

Dr. Bhopal Pandeya

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2016 in Ecosystem Services
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BPBhopal Pandeya
Bhopal Pandeya
WBW. Buytaert
W. Buytaert
ZZZed Zulkafli
Zed Zulkafli
Timos KarpouzoglouTimos Karpouzoglou
Timos Karpouzoglou
FMFeng Mao
Feng Mao
DHD.M. Hannah
D.M. Hannah
Despite significant advances in the development of the ecosystem services concept across the science and policy arenas, the valuation of ecosystem services to guide sustainable development remains challenging, especially at a local scale and in data scarce regions. In this paper, we review and compare major past and current valuation approaches and discuss their key strengths and weaknesses for guiding policy decisions. To deal with the complexity of methods used in different valuation approaches, our review uses multiple entry points: data vs simulation, habitat vs system vs place-based, specific vs entire portfolio, local vs regional scale, and monetary vs non-monetary. We find that although most valuation approaches are useful to explain ecosystem services at a macro/system level, an application of locally relevant valuation approaches, which allows for a more integrated valuation relevant to decision making is still hindered by data-scarcity. The advent of spatially explicit policy support systems shows particular promise to make the best use of available data and simulations. Data collection remains crucial for the local scale and in data scarce regions. Leveraging citizen science-based data and knowledge co-generation may support the integrated valuation, while at the same time making the valuation process more inclusive, replicable and policy-oriented

1 September 2013 in Ecosystem Services
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KPKelvin S.-H. Peh
Kelvin S.-H. Peh
ABAndrew Balmford
Andrew Balmford
RBRichard B. Bradbury
Richard B. Bradbury
CBClaire Brown
Claire Brown
SBStuart H.M. Butchart
Stuart H.M. Butchart
JBJennifer C. Birch
Jennifer C. Birch

1 June 2014 in Ecosystem Services
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJennifer C. Birch
Jennifer C. Birch
ITIshana Thapa
Ishana Thapa
ABAndrew Balmford
Andrew Balmford
RBRichard B. Bradbury
Richard B. Bradbury
CBClaire Brown
Claire Brown
DTDavid H.L. Thomas
David H.L. Thomas

1 December 2016 in Ecosystem Services
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KPKelvin S.-H. Peh
Kelvin S.-H. Peh
ITIshana Thapa
Ishana Thapa
MBMenuka Basnyat
Menuka Basnyat
ABAndrew Balmford
Andrew Balmford
GBGopal Prakash Bhattarai
Gopal Prakash Bhattarai
JMJennifer C. Merriman
Jennifer C. Merriman

15 November 2020 in Journal of Flood Risk Management
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BPBhopal Pandeya
Bhopal Pandeya
MUMadhab Uprety
Madhab Uprety
JPJonathan D. Paul
Jonathan D. Paul
RSRishi Ram Sharma
Rishi Ram Sharma
SDSumit Dugar
Sumit Dugar
WBWouter Buytaert
Wouter Buytaert
The generation of hydrological data for accurate flood predictions requires robust and, ideally, dense monitoring systems. This requirement is challenging in locations such as the Himalayas, which are characterised by unpredictable hydroclimatic behaviour with dramatic small‐scale spatial and temporal variability. River level monitoring sensors that are affordable and easy‐to‐operate could support flood risk management activities in the region. We therefore identify potential for a local participatory monitoring network that also serve to overcome existing data gaps, which represent the main bottleneck for establishing an effective community‐based flood early‐warning system. We have applied a citizen science‐based hydrological monitoring approach in which we tested low‐cost river level sensors. Initial results, collected over summer 2017 from two stations on the River Karnali, suggest that our system can successfully be operated by non‐scientists, producing river level data that match those obtained from an adjacent government‐operated high‐tech radar sensor. We discuss potential opportunities to integrate these low‐cost sensors into existing hydrological monitoring practice. Combined with an adaptive, community‐led approach to resilience building, we argue that our low‐cost sensing technology has the potential not only to increase spatial network coverage in data‐scarce regions, but also to empower and educate local stakeholders to build flood resilience.

9 November 2022 in Atmosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KSKrishna Prasad Sigdel
Krishna Prasad Sigdel
NGNarayan Prasad Prasad Ghimire
Narayan Prasad Prasad Ghimire
BPBhopal Pandeya
Bhopal Pandeya
BDBinod Dawadi
Binod Dawadi
Changes in precipitation and temperature, especially in the Himalayan region, will have repercussions for socio-economic conditions in the future. Thus, this study aimed to understand the climatic trend and changes in one of the Himalayan River basins, i.e., Gandaki River Basin (GRB), Nepal. In particular, we analysed the historical (1985–2014) and projected (2015–2100) precipitation and temperature trend and their extremes using observation and 13 bias-corrected Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 6 (CMIP6) datasets. Additionally, the relationship between extreme precipitation/temperature indices and ocean-atmospheric circulation patterns were also analysed. The results showed an increasing trend of precipitation amount and temperature at annual and seasonal scales with the highest upward trend for precipitation in monsoon season and temperature in winter season. Among nine precipitation indices analysed, the wet extremes are projected to increase in all Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP) scenarios; with the highest increment of high-intensity related extremes (R10 mm and R20 mm). In contrast, dry spells will decline in the distant-future (2075–2100) as compared to near (2015–2044) and mid-future (2045–2074). Further, increment in temperature trend resulted in a decrease in cold related temperature extremes and an increase in warm related extremes. Furthermore, it was observed that the changes in precipitation and temperature extremes over GRB were influenced by large-scale ocean-atmospheric circulation patterns. The Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO), Sea Surface Temperature (SST) and Southern Oscillation Index (SOI) were found to have a major role in driving precipitation extremes while AMO, SST and Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) have strong influence on temperature extremes. The results of this study will be useful for better understanding the implications of historical and future changes in precipitation and temperature and their extremes over the GRB.