Ultrasound (US) is often used to diagnose liver masses. Ensemble learning has recently been commonly used for image classification, but its detailed methods are not fully optimized. The purpose of this study is to investigate the usefulness and comparison of some ensemble learning and ensemble pruning techniques using multiple convolutional neural network (CNN) trained models for image classification of liver masses in US images. Dataset of the US images were classified into four categories: benign liver tumor (BLT) 6320 images, liver cyst (LCY) 2320 images, metastatic liver cancer (MLC) 9720 images, primary liver cancer (PLC) 7840 images. In this study, 250 test images were randomly selected for each class, for a total of 1000 images, and the remaining images were used as the training. 16 different CNNs were used for training and testing ultrasound images. The ensemble learning used soft voting (SV), weighted average voting (WAV), weighted hard voting (WHV) and stacking (ST). All four types of ensemble learning (SV, ST, WAV, and WHV) showed higher values of accuracy than the single CNN. All four types also showed significantly higher deep learning (DL) performance than ResNeXt101 alone. For image classification of liver masses using US images, ensemble learning improved the performance of DL over a single CNN.

A novel mobile system has been developed for use by radiologists in managing Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) image data. The system consists of a mobile DICOM server (MDS) and personal digital assistants (PDAs), including a Linux PDA with a video graphics array (VGA) display (307,200 pixels, 3.7 inches). The MDS weighs 410 g, has a 60-GB hard disk drive and a built-in wireless local area network (LAN) access point, and supports a DICOM server (Central Test Node). The Linux-based MDS can be accessed with personal computers (PCs) and PDAs by means of a wireless or wired LAN, and client-server communications can be established at any time. DICOM images can be displayed by using any PDA or PC by means of a Web browser. Simultaneous access to the MDS is possible for multiple authenticated users. With most PDAs, image compression is necessary for complete display of DICOM images; however, the VGA screen can display a 512 x 512-pixel DICOM image almost in its entirety. This wireless system allows efficient management of heavy loads of lossless DICOM image data and will be useful for collaborative work by radiologists in education, conferences, and research.

Background: Sacral fractures are often difficult to diagnose on radiographs. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can improve the detection rate but cannot always be performed. The accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) in detecting orthopaedic fractures is now comparable with that of orthopaedic specialists. However, the ability of AI to detect sacral fractures has not been investigated, to our knowledge. We hypothesized that the ability to detect sacral fractures on radiographs could be improved by using AI, and aimed to develop an AI model to detect sacral fractures accurately on radiographs with better accuracy than that of orthopaedic surgeons. Methods: Subjects were patients with suspected pelvic fractures for whom radiographs and CT scans had been obtained. The radiographs were labeled according to sacral fracture status based on CT results. The data set was divided into a training set (2,038 images) and a test set (200 images). Eight convolutional neural network (CNN) models were trained using the training set. Post-trained models were used to evaluate their discrimination ability. The detection ability of 4 experienced orthopaedic surgeons was also measured using the same test set. The results of fracture assessment by the orthopaedic surgeons were compared with those of the 3 CNNs with the greatest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: Among the 8 trained models, the highest areas under the curve were for InceptionV3 (0.989), Xception (0.987), and Inception ResNetV2 (0.984). The detection rate was significantly higher for these 3 CNNs than for the orthopaedic surgeons. Conclusions: By enhancing the processing of probabilistic tasks and the communication of their results, AI may be better able to detect sacral fractures than orthopaedic surgeons. Level of Evidence: Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.