Xiao Xu

Dr. Xiao Xu

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 October 2019 in Ophthalmic Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LALei An
Lei An
CJCatherine Lingxue Jan
Catherine Lingxue Jan
JFJingjing Feng
Jingjing Feng
ZWZhifeng Wang
Zhifeng Wang
LZLeilei Zhan
Leilei Zhan
XXXiao Xu
Xiao Xu
Purpose: To investigate the distribution of cataract surgery performed by ophthalmologists in China. Methods: A cross-sectional study was designed to investigate nationwide ophthalmological resources and capacity for cataract surgery in China⁠—The 2014 China National Eye Care Capacity and Resource Survey. Data analyzed in this report included regional distribution, urban-rural comparison, levels and types of medical institutions, and cataract surgery types and volume per surgeon. In China, only ophthalmologists at or above the level of attending are eligible to perform cataract surgery independently, so the ability of cataract surgery for ophthalmologists at or above the level of attending is analyzed in the current study. Descriptive statistics were used. Results: 36,333 ophthalmologists were included in this survey, which is an average of 1.33 ophthalmologists to every 50,000 population. Of the surgeons in this survey, 23,412 (50.22%) were attending or more senior ophthalmologists and were mainly distributed in eastern urban areas. Annual average cataract surgeries per ophthalmologist in China were 259 in 2017, less than 300 cases. Conclusion: The average number of ophthalmologists per population in China has achieved the goal of WHO’s Vision 2020; however, these surgeons are concentrated in urban areas. Further, the ability of cataract surgery among ophthalmologists is unbalanced. The annual average cataract surgeries performed by ophthalmologists are insufficient, which is an important factor resulting in the current situation in China that ophthalmic service capacity has not met the requirements for eliminating cataract blindness.

16 April 2020 in Human Resources for Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LZLeilei Zhan
Leilei Zhan
NSNeha Safaya
Neha Safaya
HEHana Erkou
Hana Erkou
LALei An
Lei An
ZWzhifeng wang
zhifeng wang
XXXiao Xu
Xiao Xu
This study compares perspectives on specialized ophthalmic medical institutions, identifies the gaps in property and geographic offerings, and explores the ways that ophthalmic medical institutions can better allocate resources. The results of this research will increase patient’s access to equitable and high-quality ophthalmic care in China. The data for this research was gathered from the Survey of China National Eye Care Capacity and Resource for the year 2015. The paper specified the number, professional level of expertise, and educational background of ophthalmic health personnel. The authors of the paper analyzed and compared the differences in ophthalmic care in public vs. private and urban vs. rural regions in China. Descriptive statistics were used. Of the 395 specialized ophthalmic hospitals surveyed, 332 were private medical institutions (84%), and 63 were public (16%). Of the 26 607 ophthalmic personnel surveyed, working in specialized ophthalmic hospitals, 17 561 were in private hospitals (66%) and 9 046 were in public ones (34%). Furthermore, 22 578 of those personnel worked in urban ophthalmic institutions (85%) and 4 029 worked in rural ones (15%). As for regional differences, 14 090 personnel were located in eastern China (53%), 8 828 in central regions (33%), and 3 689 in the western regions (14%). Public ophthalmic medical institutions still face challenges in providing equitable and widespread care. The availability of well-staffed health centers varies significantly by region. These variations impact resource allocation and directly lead to inequalities and inaccessibility of health services in certain regions of China.

5 April 2023 in BMJ Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JFJingjing Feng
Jingjing Feng
CJCatherine Jan
Catherine Jan
YPYaguang Peng
Yaguang Peng
MHMingguang He
Mingguang He
LALei An
Lei An
LYLi Yao
Li Yao
Objective To evaluate patients’ benefits after cataract surgery and to form recommendations for Chinese national health policy decision makers and administration departments based on the quality of cataract treatments. Method An observational study based on real-world data source from the National Cataract Recovery Surgery Information Registration and Reporting System. Results A total of 14 157 463 original records were reported from 1 July 2009 to 31 December 2018. The factors that influenced the 3-day postsurgical best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), the primary outcome, were analysed by logistic regression analysis. We found that a history of hypertension (OR=0.916) or diabetes (OR=0.912), presurgical pupil abnormality (OR=0.571) and high intraocular pressure (OR=0.578) were harmful to the postsurgical BCVA improvement (BCVA ≥6/20), while male sex (OR=1.113), better presurgical BCVA level (OR=5.996 for ≥6/12–6/60–<6/12 taken ≤6/60 as reference), age-related cataract (OR=1.825) and intraocular lens implantation (OR=1.886) were statistically beneficial to the postsurgical BCVA improvement. Compared with extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) with large incision, the ECCE with small incision (OR value=1.810) and the phacoemulsification (OR=1.420) significantly improved the benefit probability. Conclusion ECCE with small incision has comparable effects on postsurgical BCVA improvement of phacoemulsification. Therefore, ECCE could be an alternative cataract surgical treatment in economically underdeveloped areas in China, provided the surgeons are adequately trained.