Low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy is a well established treatment for the early stages of tongue cancer. High dose rate (HDR) afterloading devices have replaced LDR brachytherapy in many radiotherapy departments, but the effect and safety of HDR brachytherapy in comparison with LDR brachytherapy for interstitial applications is an unresolved question. The aim of our radiobiological study was to utilize dose volume histiograms from patients treated in our institution to simulate the risk of complication of LDR and HDR brachytherapy. Normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) of acute mucositis, late mucosal necrosis and osteoradionecrosis of two HDR brachytherapy schedules (18 x 3 Gy bid and 10 x 6 Gy bid) and of LDR brachytherapy with identical tumor control probability were compared using data from 8 brachytherapy applications. A linear quadratic (LQ) model was used to calculate the biologically equivalent doses, the effective volume method of Kutcher and Burman and Lyman's model was used to calculate NTCP. The Student's two-tailed test was used for statistical analysis. For 18 x 3 Gy bid the risk of acute mucositis and of late mucosal necrosis was 1.48 and 1.66 times higher with HDR in comparison with LDR brachytherapy. For 10 x 6 Gy bid the risk of acute mucositis, mucosal necrosis and osteoradionecrosis was 1.3, 3.44 and 13.18 times higher with HDR brachytherapy. All differences were statistically highly significant. Our radiobiological study supported the hypothesis that HDR has a higher risk of complication in comparison with LDR brachytherapy for the same tumor control probability.

Radical radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy is an established treatment for cervical cancer patients with stage FIGO IIB and higher. The tumor control can be achieved in 40-80% of patients, the treatment is associated with the risk of late postiradiation complications in 10 - 15% of cases. Detection of the factors predictive for tumor control and late morbidity is a possible direction how to individualize radiotherapy dose and technique. The aim of our review is to summarize results of studies inquiring various molecular markers predicting tumor response to radiotherapy and a risk of late complications. A lot of candidate molecules were evaluated in histochemical studies: membrane receptors (EGFR, HER-2), cell cycle regulators (p53, p21), proliferative markers (Ki-67), hypoxia and angiogenetic factors (HIF, VEGF), HPV status, and others (COX-2), with promising results in some of them (HPV, HIF-1α, Ku80, ATM polymorphism). Microarray studies identified decades of genes with different expression in radiosensitive/radioresistant cervical tumors and sets of genes are able to comletely separate responding and nonresponding tumors, but these sets differ across studies. Further well designed studies will be necessary to achieve results matured for use in clinical practice.

Low-dose rate brachytherapy is a well established treatment modality of oral cancer. Data about high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy are still sparse with various fractionation schedules and heterogeneous results. The aim of our retrospective study was to evaluate the results of HDR brachytherapy with doses of 3 Gy twice daily. Twenty patients with squamous cell tongue cancer were treated in the years 2001-2009 by exclusive HDR BT 18 × 3 Gy twice daily. The plastic tube technique was used. Median follow up was 47 months (7.8-118) since brachytherapy. The local and locoregional control was 85% and 68%, respectively. Bone necrosis developed in one case treated without mandibular shielding and soft tissue necrosis in 2 cases. It can be concluded that HDR brachytherapy with 18 × 3 Gy twice daily is safe with promising local control. The risk of nodal recurrences is substantial.