Patients with heart failure (HF) and their caregivers are a dyad inextricably linked that exert influence on patients’ quality of life (QoL). Purpose: The aim of this study was to explore factors affecting HF patients’ QoL. Factors were: (a) HF patients’ characteristics, (b) anxiety/depression of the dyad (patient–caregiver) and (c) caregivers’ QoL. Material and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we enrolled 340 patients and 340 caregivers. Data collection was performed by the method of an interview using “The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale”, HADS) to assess anxiety and depression (patient–caregiver) as well as the “Minnesota Living with Heart Failure” and the “SF-36 Health Survey (SF-36)” to assess QoL (patient–caregiver, respectively). Results: From the 340 dyads who comprised the sample, 81.3% and 77.5% of patients experienced anxiety and depression, respectively, while 79.3% and 62.2% of caregivers experienced anxiety and depression, respectively. A statistically significant difference between patients and caregivers was only detected for depression (p = 0.001) and not for anxiety (p = 0.567). Patients with scores in HADS that indicate anxiety and depression had a worse QoL (total, physical, and mental). All subscales of the caregiver’s QoL were significantly associated with the patient’s QoL (p < 0.001) apart from the physical functioning scale. The correlation coefficients were all negative, indicating that a better caregiver’s QoL (higher SF36 scores) is associated with a better patient’s QoL (lower Minnesota scores). After controlling for the patient’s characteristics, the anxiety and depression of caregivers did not affect the patient’s QoL (confounding effect) whereas the patient’s anxiety/depression remained significant factors. Patients with anxiety and depression had 5.58 and 6.49 points, respectively, higher QoL score, meaning a worse QoL, compared to those with no anxiety/depression. Conclusions: Evaluating the impact of HF on patients’ QoL and anxiety/depression along with their caregivers permits acknowledgment of this dyadic relationship.

Introduction: Heart failure (HF) is a complex clinical syndrome associated with increased disability, morbidity and mortality globally. HF is characterized by recurrent exacerbations and a high rate of hospital readmissions. Self-care is a crucial component of treatment. The way patients assess the importance of self-care may shed light on planning effective individualized interventions. The aim of this study was to conduct a validity and reliability analysis of the new 14-item IPSC scale, which measures how important HF patients consider their physical self-care behavior (IPSC, Importance of Physical Self-Care). Material and Methods: The 14-item IPSC scale was created by the researchers to explore how important HF patients consider their physical self-care behavior. The validation of the IPSC scale included face and content validity, construct validity, internal consistency, repeatability and discriminant validity. Patients’ characteristics were also included. Results: In the present study, 52 hospitalized HF patients were enrolled, of whom 55.8% were female, 34.6% above 70 years old, 48.1% of NYHA class III and 32.7% suffered this illness from 6 to 10 years. The total IPSC score had a possible range of 14–56, with higher scores indicating a low importance of self-care. The descriptive statistics in the IPSC scale showed a mean score of 27.9 ± 4.9 and a median score of 29, indicating that HF patients evaluated self-care behavior as moderately important. All items were found to be statistically significantly correlated with total scale scores (p ≤ 0.05), with correlation coefficients rho > 0.250, indicating moderate to strong correlations and meaning that all items are important in the calculation of the final score (construct validity). The internal consistency of the items that constituted the total score was found to be high (Cronbach’s a > 0.7). Furthermore, it was found that scores had high repeatability (p ≤ 0.001 and ICCs > 0.7). Regarding discriminant validity, a statistically significant association was observed between the importance of physical self-care behavior and both years suffering the illness (p = 0.007) and the NYHA class (p = 0.030). Conclusion: The 14-item IPSC scale is a reliable instrument that help nurses in clinical settings to gain a better and prompt understanding of the importance which patients invest in their physical self-care behavior.

Introduction: Caregiving has been an emerging public health priority mainly due to the rapid pace of population aging, increase in chronic diseases and shortages of health professionals. In clinical settings, caregivers have a crucial role by providing support to patients. Consequently, they may experience physical and emotional burden mainly attributed to environmental, personal or family stressors. The aim of this study was to evaluate fatigue and the associated factors among caregivers of hospitalized patients in medical-surgical wards. Methods and Material: In the present study caregivers of hospitalized patients in medical and surgical wards were enrolled. Collection of data was performed with the following: a. Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS), b. Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and c. Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS), which included patients’ characteristics. In this cross-sectional study, participants were selected using the method of convenience sampling. Results: Of the 142 participants, the majority were spouses (64.8%), female (64.8%) and over 60 years old (53.6%). The mean FAS score was 25.9 ± 9.3, the mean SAS was 38.1 ± 9.0, and the mean AIS score was 7.6 ± 4.7, indicating moderate, moderate to low and moderate levels of fatigue, anxiety and insomnia, respectively. Moreover, fatigue showed a positive linear correlation with both anxiety (Spearman’s rho = 0.713) and insomnia (Spearman’s rho = 0.671). The factors found to be statistically significantly associated with caregivers’ fatigue were the following: gender (p = 0.001), length of hospitalization (p = 0.013), experience of environmental stressors (p = 0.045), experience of financial stressors (p = 0.001), and unfamiliarity with the provision of care (p = 0.001). Conclusions: Provided that caregivers’ involvement in care not only enhances patient well-being but also supports clinical teams, it is widely comprehended that addressing their needs should be emphasized.

Introduction: Vital exhaustion (VE), characterized by fatigue, irritability, frustration, and hopelessness, has been associated with the development and progression of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and is considered a maladaptive response to chronic stress. This study aimed to explore the association of VE with anxiety and insomnia in hospitalized patients with CVD, as well as the demographic and clinical characteristics associated with VE. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted including 200 hospitalized patients with CVD. VE was assessed using the Maastricht Questionnaire (MEQ); anxiety, using the Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS); and insomnia, using the Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS). Additionally, a structured questionnaire on clinical and demographic variables was utilized. Results: The majority of the 200 participants were men (60.7%) and aged 71–80 years (40%). The mean VE score was 21.4 ± 10.1 within score range from 0 to 40. VE was significantly associated with gender (p = 0.002), age (p = 0.006), occupation (p = 0.006), type of CVD (p < 0.001), comorbidity burden (p = 0.001), and perceived importance of written health information (p = 0.015). Higher VE scores were positively correlated with both anxiety and insomnia (p < 0.05). Conclusions: VE is closely associated with anxiety and insomnia and is influenced by key demographic and clinical factors in hospitalized patients with CVD. These findings highlight VE as a clinically relevant condition and identify distinct high-risk patient groups that may benefit from targeted assessment and management strategies.