Francisco José Barbosa Camacho

Dr. Francisco José Barbosa Camacho

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 June 2022 in BMC Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FCFrancisco José Barbosa Camacho
Francisco José Barbosa Camacho
OROlaya Moramay Romero-Limón
Olaya Moramay Romero-Limón
JIJuan Carlos Ibarrola-Peña
Juan Carlos Ibarrola-Peña
YAYolanda Lorelei Almanza-Mena
Yolanda Lorelei Almanza-Mena
KPKevin Josué Pintor-Belmontes
Kevin Josué Pintor-Belmontes
AGAlejandro González-Ojeda
Alejandro González-Ojeda
Depression and anxiety are common after months of social isolation, and they can have a negative impact on anyone's quality of life if they are not treated promptly and appropriately. The aim of this study was to determine if the change to online modality courses and the presence of depression or anxiety symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a difference in the college student’s academic achievement. This study was a cross-sectional survey in which we used the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and the General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7). Also, we examined the students' perceptions of their academic performance using the Academic Self-Concept Scale (ASCS). A total of 610 students responded to the survey. The average score on the Academic Self-Concept Scale was 2.76 ± 0.35, the students presented a risk of 61.5% for possible depressive disorder and 52.1% for possible generalized anxiety disorder. The intensity of depression and anxiety symptoms had a significant effect on Academic Self-Concept Scale scores (p < 0.001 and p < 0.05, respectively). The findings indicate that the COVID-19 pandemic has had a direct effect on students' mental health and academic performance.

24 May 2022 in The Lancet Global Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CSCatherine A Shaw
Catherine A Shaw
RPRiinu Pius
Riinu Pius
TDThomas M Drake
Thomas M Drake
LNLisa Norman
Lisa Norman
AAAdesoji O Ademuyiwa
Adesoji O Ademuyiwa
JLJean Wilguens Lartigue
Jean Wilguens Lartigue
Early death after cancer surgery is higher in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) compared with in high-income countries, yet the impact of facility characteristics on early postoperative outcomes is unknown. The aim of this study was to examine the association between hospital infrastructure, resource availability, and processes on early outcomes after cancer surgery worldwide. A multimethods analysis was performed as part of the GlobalSurg 3 study—a multicentre, international, prospective cohort study of patients who had surgery for breast, colorectal, or gastric cancer. The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and 30-day major complication rates. Potentially beneficial hospital facilities were identified by variable selection to select those associated with 30-day mortality. Adjusted outcomes were determined using generalised estimating equations to account for patient characteristics and country-income group, with population stratification by hospital. Between April 1, 2018, and April 23, 2019, facility-level data were collected for 9685 patients across 238 hospitals in 66 countries (91 hospitals in 20 high-income countries; 57 hospitals in 19 upper-middle-income countries; and 90 hospitals in 27 low-income to lower-middle-income countries). The availability of five hospital facilities was inversely associated with mortality: ultrasound, CT scanner, critical care unit, opioid analgesia, and oncologist. After adjustment for case-mix and country income group, hospitals with three or fewer of these facilities (62 hospitals, 1294 patients) had higher mortality compared with those with four or five (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3·85 [95% CI 2·58–5·75]; p<0·0001), with excess mortality predominantly explained by a limited capacity to rescue following the development of major complications (63·0% vs 82·7%; OR 0·35 [0·23–0·53]; p<0·0001). Across LMICs, improvements in hospital facilities would prevent one to three deaths for every 100 patients undergoing surgery for cancer. Hospitals with higher levels of infrastructure and resources have better outcomes after cancer surgery, independent of country income. Without urgent strengthening of hospital infrastructure and resources, the reductions in cancer-associated mortality associated with improved access will not be realised. National Institute for Health and Care Research.

1 January 2019 in Medical Education Online
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RMRoberto Carlos Miranda-Ackerman
Roberto Carlos Miranda-Ackerman
FCFrancisco José Barbosa Camacho
Francisco José Barbosa Camacho
MSMaría José Sander-Möller
María José Sander-Möller
ABArturo David Buenrostro-Jiménez
Arturo David Buenrostro-Jiménez
RMRoberto Mares-País
Roberto Mares-País
AGAlejandro González-Ojeda
Alejandro González-Ojeda
Burnout syndrome is a psychological condition that commonly affects health professionals, medical students, and others in professions with long shifts. It is defined by a high amount of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and low personal job satisfaction. We aimed to determine the prevalence of burnout syndrome in medical interns and establish the relationships between this condition and the time and type of hospital at which students worked during their medical internship. This was a survey study in which we used the Maslach Burnout Inventory, applied to fifth-year medical students on an internship at private and public hospitals in Mexico. The participants were 96 women (54.5%) and 80 men (45.5%), with ages ranging from 21 to 34 years old. We found burnout syndrome in 20% of these medical students 22% of the women and 18.6% of the men in the sample. Second-semester interns suffered burnout at a rate of 29%, in contrast to 15% of first-semester students. Emotional exhaustion and depersonalization scores were higher in second-semester interns who worked in public hospitals. However, the prevalence did not differ between public and private hospitals. Our study reports a higher prevalence of burnout syndrome during the second semester of internship. Students who practiced their internship in a public hospital showed higher scores in emotional exhaustion and depersonalization than those who practiced in a private hospital.

9 July 2020 in BMC Health Services Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RMRoberto Carlos Miranda-Ackerman
Roberto Carlos Miranda-Ackerman
MLMariana Lira-Trujillo
Mariana Lira-Trujillo
AGAlma Carolina Gollaz-Cervantez
Alma Carolina Gollaz-Cervantez
ACAna Olivia Cortés-Flores
Ana Olivia Cortés-Flores
CVCarlos José Zuloaga-Fernández del Valle
Carlos José Zuloaga-Fernández del Valle
AGAlejandro González-Ojeda
Alejandro González-Ojeda
Background: Patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) experience sleep disruption caused by a variety of conditions, such as staff activities, alarms on monitors, and overall noise. In this study, we explored the relationship between noise and other factors associated with poor sleep quality in patients. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study. We used the Richards–Campbell Sleep Questionnaire to explore sleep quality in a sample of patients admitted to the ICU of a private hospital. We measured the noise levels within each ICU three times a day. After each night during their ICU stay, patients were asked to complete a survey about sleep disturbances. These disturbances were classified as biological (such as anxiety or pain) and environmental factors (such as lighting and ICU noise). Results: We interviewed 71 patients; 62% were men (mean age 54.46 years) and the mean length of stay was 8 days. Biological factors affected 36% and environmental factors affected 20% of the patients. The most common biological factor was anxiety symptoms, which affected 28% of the patients, and the most common environmental factor was noise, which affected 32.4%. The overall mean recorded noise level was 62.45 dB. Based on the patients’ responses, the environmental factors had a larger effect on patients’ sleep quality than biological factors. Patients who stayed more than 5 days reported less sleep disturbance. Patients younger than 55 years were more affected by environmental and biological factors than were those older than 55 years. Conclusions: Patient quality of sleep in the ICU is associated with environmental factors such as noise and artificial lighting, as well as biological factors related to anxiety and pain. The noise level in the ICU is twice that recommended by international guides. Given the stronger influence of environmental factors, the use of earplugs or sleeping masks is recommended. The longer the hospital stay, the less these factors seem to affect patients’ sleep quality.

26 March 2020 in BMC Gastroenterology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MCMariana Chávez-Tostado
Mariana Chávez-Tostado
GCGabino Cervantes-Guevara
Gabino Cervantes-Guevara
SLSandra Estefanía López-Alvarado
Sandra Estefanía López-Alvarado
GCGabino Cervantes-Pérez
Gabino Cervantes-Pérez
FCFrancisco José Barbosa Camacho
Francisco José Barbosa Camacho
AGAlejandro González-Ojeda
Alejandro González-Ojeda
Background: The prevalence of malnutrition remains high in hospitals but no “gold standard” has been established to identify nutritional risks adequately. The Nutrition Risk Screening-2002 (NRS-2002), Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), and Controlling Nutritional Status Index (CONUT) are widely used screening tools, but their efficacy has not yet been compared in Mexican patients. Here, we aimed to compare the efficacy of these tools in identifying nutritional risks within the first 48 h of admission in a group of patients with gastrointestinal diseases. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of 196 patients. The results of the screening tools, length of hospital stay, serum albumin and cholesterol concentrations, lymphocyte counts, age, body mass index (BMI), complications, and mortality were analyzed. Kappa (κ) statistics were applied to determine the degree of agreement between tools. The performances of the screening tools in predicting complications and mortality were assessed using binary logistic regression. Results: The NRS-2002, SGA, and CONUT tools identified nutritional risk in 67, 74, and 51% of the patients, respectively. The observed agreements between tools were: NRS2002/SGA, κ = 0.53; CONUT/NRS-2002, κ = 0.42; and SGA/CONUT, κ = 0.36. Within age groups, the best agreement was found in those aged 51–65 years (κ = 0.68). CONUT and length of stay were both predictive for the number of complications. The number of complications and serum cholesterol concentrations were predictive for mortality. Conclusions: The proportion of patients identified as having nutritional risk was high using all three screening tools. SGA, NRS-2002, and CONUT had similar capacities for screening risk, but the best agreement was observed between NRS-2002 and SGA. Only CONUT predicted complications, but none of these tools performed well in predicting mortality.

10 June 2020 in Research Square
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
BGBenjamín García-Reyna
Benjamín García-Reyna
GCGilberto Daniel Castillo-García
Gilberto Daniel Castillo-García
FCFrancisco José Barbosa Camacho
Francisco José Barbosa Camacho
GCGuillermo Alonso Cervantes-Cardona
Guillermo Alonso Cervantes-Cardona
Enrique Cervantes-PérezEnrique Cervantes-Pérez
Enrique Cervantes-Pérez
GCGabino Cervantes-Guevara
Gabino Cervantes-Guevara
The presence of COVID-19 has had psychological consequences among health personnel; these include fear, anxiety, and depression. In the current study, we used the Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S) to assess the response to fear within health staff in Mexico. This was a cross-sectional survey study in which we administered the FCV-19S to hospital staff. A total of 2,860 participants—1,641 female and 1,218 male personnel from three hospitals—were included in the study. We found a global FCV-19S mean score of 19.3 ± 6.9, with a significant difference in scores for women and men. There was a high correlation between items 3, 5, 6, and 7, suggesting that these items could indicate the physiological responses to fear, and a high correlation between items 1, 2, and 4, suggesting these items could represent the emotional responses to fear. Our survey shows a significantly higher level of fear in nursing and administrative personnel, which may be explained by the nursing staff being in close contact with infected patients and the administrative staff lacking understanding of the possible implications of the infection, compared with non-clinical hospital personnel. The FCV-19S showed validity and reliability in our population to assess fear in response to COVID-19. Our results are consistent with those of other researchers.