Peucedanum franchetii is a famous folk medicinal plant in China. However, the taxonomy of the P. franchetii has not been sufficiently resolved. Due to similar morphological features between P. franchetii and Ligusticopsis members, the World Flora Online (WFO) Plant List suggested that this species transformed into the genus Ligusticopsis and merged with Ligusticopsis likiangensis. However, both species are obviously diverse in leaf shape, bracts, and bracteoles. To check the taxonomic position of P. franchetii, we newly sequenced and assembled the plastome of P. franchetii and compared it with nine other plastomes of the genus Ligusticopsis. Ten plastomes were highly conserved and similar in gene order, codon bias, RNA editing sites, IR borders, and SSRs. Nevertheless, 10 mutation hotspot regions (infA, rps8, matK, ndhF, rps15, psbA-trnH, rps2-rpoC2, psbA-trnK, ycf2-trnL, and ccsA-ndhD) were still detected. In addition, both phylogenetic analyses based on plastome data and ITS sequences robustly supported that P. franchetii was not clustered with members of Peucedanum but nested in Ligusticopsis. P. franchetii was sister to L. likiangensis in the ITS topology but clustered with L. capillacea in the plastome tree. These findings implied that P. franchetii should be transferred to genus Ligusticopsis and not merged with L. likiangensis, but as an independent species, which was further verified by morphological evidences. Therefore, transferring P. franchetii under the genus Ligusticopsis as an independent species was reasonable, and a new combination was presented.

The genus Sanicula L. possesses many medically important plants, belonging to the family Apiaceae. It is one of the most taxonomically difficult taxa, largely due to the great variability in habit, foliage, flowers and fruits. Previous studies have mainly focused on the molecular studies of this genus, and the morphological research for this genus was limited, especially in the micromorphological research. In the current study, we newly obtained leaf materials from twenty-two Sanicula members, fruit and pollen materials from twenty Sanicula members and performed comprehensively micromorphological analyses for this complicated genus. The results of the leaf epidermis showed that the upper and lower epidermis were smooth and glabrous, and the cell shape was polygonal or irregular. The patterns of anticlinal wall were shallowly undulating, deeply undulating, subflat or flat. The cuticular membrane ornamentations were diverse, and some species had epidermal appendage. All Sanicula species observed the stomata in the lower epidermis, and only five species (S. rugulosa, S. elongata, S. hacquetioides, S. tienmuensis and S. elata) observed stomata in the upper epidermis, which can easily identify them from other Sanicula members. In addition, we found that the fruits scarcely compressed, and some fruits had their distinctive shape, such as the fruit shape of S. tienmuensis was subglobose, S. subgiraldii was broadly ovate and S. pengshuiensis was ellipsoid. All Sanicula taxa fruits surfaces were covered with prickles, bristles, protuberance, or tubercles, prickles were either long or short, uncinate or straight, rarely scale-like, ribs inconspicuous or slightly prominent, but the prickles/bristles/tubercles were different in shape, sparseness and arrangement. The vittae were distinct in S. rubriflora, S. chinensis, S. caerulescens, S. pengshuiensis, S. pauciflora, S. lamelligera, S. oviformis, S. flavovirens and S. elata, and the remaining taxa were obscure. These findings indicated that the fruits can clearly distinguish these Sanicula members. Furthermore, the micromorphological characteristics of pollen showed that the equatorial view included four shapes: ellipsoid, subrectangular, equatorially constricted and super-rectangular-equatorially constricted; and the polar view possessed four shapes: triangular, triangular–circular, suborbicular and trilobate circular. The germ furrow and the outer wall ornamentation of all Sanicula taxa were quite similar, indicating that the genus was a natural unit. In summary, our study promoted the improvement of a taxonomic system for the genus and also provided additional evidence for future taxonomic study of the genus Sanicula.

Ligusticopsis litangensis is identified and described as a cryptic species from Sichuan Province, China. Although the distribution of this cryptic species overlaps with that of Ligusticopsis capillacea and Ligusticopsis dielsiana, the morphological boundaries between them are explicit and have obviously distinguishable characters. The main distinguishing features of the cryptic species are as follows: long conical multi-branched roots, very short pedicels in compound umbels, unequal rays, oblong-globose fruits, 1–2 vittae per furrow and 3–4 vittae on the commissure. The above-mentioned features differ somewhat from other species within the genus Ligusticopsis, but generally coincide with the morphological boundaries defined for the genus Ligusticopsis. To determine the taxonomic position of L. litangensis, we sequenced and assembled the plastomes of L. litangensis and compared them with the plastomes of 11 other species of the genus Ligusticopsis. Notably, both phylogenetic analyses based on ITS sequences and the complete chloroplast genome robustly supported that three accessions of L. litangensis are monophyletic clade and then nested in Ligusticopsis genus. Moreover, the plastid genomes of 12 Ligusticopsis species, including the new species, were highly conserved in terms of gene order, gene content, codon bias, IR boundaries and SSR content. Overall, the integration of morphological, comparative genomic and phylogenetic evidence indicates that Ligusticopsis litangensis actually represents a new species.

Peucedanum nanum and P. violaceum are recognized as members of the genus Peucedanum because of their dorsally compressed mericarps with slightly prominent dorsal ribs and narrowly winged lateral ribs. However, these species are not similar to other Peucedanum taxa but resemble Ligusticopsis in overall morphology. To check the taxonomic positions of P. nanum and P. violaceum, we sequenced their complete plastid genome (plastome) sequences and, together with eleven previously published Ligusticopsis plastomes, performed comprehensively comparative analyses. The thirteen plastomes were highly conserved and similar in structure, size, GC content, gene content and order, IR borders, and the patterns of codon bias, RNA editing, and simple sequence repeats (SSRs). Nevertheless, twelve mutation hotspots (matK, ndhC, rps15, rps8, ycf2, ccsA-ndhD, petN-psbM, psbA-trnK, rps2-rpoC2, rps4-trnT, trnH-psbA, and ycf2-trnL) were selected. Moreover, both the phylogenetic analyses based on plastomes and on nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences robustly supported that P. nanum and P. violaceum nested in Ligusticopsis, and this was further confirmed by the morphological evidence. Hence, transferring P. nanum and P. violaceum into Ligusticopsis genus is reasonable and convincing, and two new combinations are presented.

Background: Ligusticum L. plants exhibit significant morphological variation in leaves, flowers, bracteoles and mericarps, thus the classifications of members for the genus have always been controversial. Among them, the taxonomic problem of Ligusticum multivittatum Franch. is the most prominent, which has not been sufficiently resolved so far. Methods: to clarify the taxonomic position of Ligusticum multivittatum, we performed phylogenetic analyses based on plastome data and ITS sequences. Meanwhile, we conducted comprehensively comparative plastome analyses between Ligusticum multivittatum and fifteen Ligusticopsis species. Results: Both analyses robustly supported that Ligusticum multivittatum nested in genus Ligusticopsis Leute and formed a clade with fifteen Ligusticopsis species, belonged to the Selineae tribe, which was distant from the type species of Ligusticum (Ligusticum scoticum), located in the Acronema clade.The comparative results showed that sixteen plastomes were highly similar and conservative in genome structure, size, gene content and arrangement, codon bias, SSRs and SC/IR. These findings imply that Ligusticum multivittatum is a member of Ligusticopsis, which was further verified by their shared morphological characters: stem base clothed in fibrous remnant sheaths, white petals, pinnate bracteoles, dorsally compressed mericarps with slightly prominent dorsal ribs, winged lateral ribs and numerous vittae in the commissure and in each furrow. Therefore, combining with the evidences of phylogenetic analyses, plastome comparison and morphological features, we affirmed that Ligusticum multivittatum indeed belonged to Ligusticopsis and transformed it into Ligusticopsis conducted by Pimenov was reasonable. Conclusions: Our study not only confirms the classification of Ligusticum multivittatum by integrating evidences, but also provides a reference for resolving taxonomy of contentious taxa.