Nirupama Agrawal

Prof. Dr. Nirupama Agrawal

Faculty of Liberal Arts & Professional Studies, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 September 2006 in Natural Hazards
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Nirupama AgrawalNirupama Agrawal
Nirupama Agrawal
SSSlobodan P. Simonovic
Slobodan P. Simonovic

28 April 2020 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Nirupama AgrawalNirupama Agrawal
Nirupama Agrawal
MEMark Elliott
Mark Elliott
Slobodan SimonovicSlobodan Simonovic
Slobodan Simonovic
Canada’s vast regions are reacting to climate change in uncertain ways. Understanding of local disaster risks and knowledge of underlying causes for negative impacts of disasters are critical factors to working toward a resilient environment across the social, economic, and the built sectors. Historically, floods have caused more economical and social damage around the world than other types of natural hazards. Since the 1900s, the most frequent hazards in Canada have been floods, wildfire, drought, and extreme cold, in terms of economic damage. The recent flood events in the Canadian provinces of Ontario, New Brunswick, Quebec, Alberta, and Manitoba have raised compelling concerns. These include should communities be educated with useful knowledge on hazard risk and resilience so they would be interested in the discussion on the vital role they can play in building resilience in their communities. Increasing awareness that perceived risk can be very different from the real threat is the motivation behind this study. The main objectives of this study include identifying and quantifying the gap between people’s perception of exposure and susceptibility to the risk and a lack of coping capacity and objective assessment of risk and resilience, as well as estimating an integrated measure of disaster resilience in a community. The proposed method has been applied to floods as an example, using actual data on the geomorphology of the study area, including terrain and low lying regions. It is hoped that the study will encourage a broader debate if a unified strategy for disaster resilience would be feasible and beneficial in Canada.

4 February 2015 in Natural Hazards
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SASusan Agada
Susan Agada
Nirupama AgrawalNirupama Agrawal
Nirupama Agrawal

9 May 2014 in Natural Hazards
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CACostas Armenakis
Costas Armenakis
Nirupama AgrawalNirupama Agrawal
Nirupama Agrawal

12 April 2012 in Natural Hazards
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CACostas Armenakis
Costas Armenakis
Nirupama AgrawalNirupama Agrawal
Nirupama Agrawal

2 September 2016 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SISarah Irwin
Sarah Irwin
ASAndre Schardong
Andre Schardong
Slobodan SimonovicSlobodan Simonovic
Slobodan Simonovic
Nirupama AgrawalNirupama Agrawal
Nirupama Agrawal
Damages to urban systems as a result of water-related natural disasters have escalated in recent years. The observed trend is expected to increase in the future as the impacts of population growth, rapid urbanization and climate change persist. To alleviate the damages associated with these impacts, it is recommended to integrate disaster management methods into planning, design and operational policies under all levels of government. This manuscript proposes the concept of ResilSIM: A decision support tool that rapidly estimates the resilience (a modern disaster management measure that is dynamic in time and space) of an urban system to the consequences of natural disasters. The web-based tool (with mobile access) operates in near real-time. It is designed to assist decision makers in selecting the best options for integrating adaptive capacity into their communities to protect against the negative impacts of a hazard. ResilSIM is developed for application in Toronto and London, Ontario, Canada; however, it is only demonstrated for use in the city of London, which is susceptible to riverine flooding. It is observed how the incorporation of different combinations of adaptation options maintain or strengthen London’s basic structures and functions in the event of a flood.