Joaquim Pinheiro

Prof. Joaquim Pinheiro

Department of Pediatrics, Albany Medical College, MC-101, 47 New Scotland Avenue, Albany, NY 12208, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

38Years (1989-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2000 in Ear & Hearing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LDLarry Dalzell
Larry Dalzell
MOMark Orlando
Mark Orlando
MMMatthew MacDonald
Matthew MacDonald
ABAbbey Berg
Abbey Berg
MBMary Bradley
Mary Bradley
BPBeth Prieve
Beth Prieve
To determine the ages of hearing loss identification, hearing aid fitting, and enrollment in early intervention through a multi-center, state-wide universal newborn hearing screening project. Universal newborn hearing screening was conducted at eight hospitals across New York State. All infants who did not bilaterally pass hearing screening before discharge were recalled for outpatient retesting. Inpatient screening and outpatient rescreening were done with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions and/or auditory brain stem response testing. Diagnostic testing was performed with age appropriate tests, auditory brain stem response and/or visual reinforcement audiometry. Infants diagnosed with permanent hearing loss were considered for hearing aids and early intervention. Ages of hearing loss identification, hearing aid fitting, and enrollment in early intervention were investigated regarding nursery type, risk status, unilateral versus bilateral hearing loss, loss type, loss severity, and state regions. The prevalence of infants diagnosed with permanent hearing loss was 2.0/1000 (85 of 43,311). Of the 85 infants with hearing loss, 61% were from neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and 67% were at risk for hearing loss. Of the 36 infants fitted with hearing aids, 58% were from NICUs and 78% were at risk for hearing loss. The median age at identification and enrollment in early intervention was 3 mo. Median age at hearing aid fitting was 7.5 mo. Median ages at identification were less for infants from the well-baby nurseries (WBNs) than for the NICU infants and for infants with severe/profound than for infants with mild/moderate hearing loss, but were similar for not-at-risk and at-risk infants. Median ages at hearing aid fitting were less for well babies than for NICU infants, for not-at-risk infants than for at-risk infants, and for infants with severe/profound hearing loss than for infants with mild/moderate hearing loss. However, median ages at early intervention enrollment were similar for nursery types, risk status, and severity of hearing loss. Early ages of hearing loss identification, hearing aid fitting, and enrollment in early intervention can be achieved for infants from NICUs and WBNs and for infants at risk and not at risk for hearing loss in a large multi-center universal newborn hearing screening program.

3 December 2015 in Journal of Perinatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Joaquim PinheiroJoaquim Pinheiro
Joaquim Pinheiro
QSQ Santana-Rivas
Q Santana-Rivas
CPC Pezzano
C Pezzano

1 April 2000 in Ear & Hearing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BPBeth Prieve
Beth Prieve
LDLarry Dalzell
Larry Dalzell
ABAbbey Berg
Abbey Berg
MBMary Bradley
Mary Bradley
ACAnthony Cacace
Anthony Cacace
FSFrances Stevens
Frances Stevens
To investigate outpatient outcome measures of a multi-center, state-wide, universal newborn hearing screening project. Eight hospitals participated in a 3-yr, funded project. Each hospital designed its own protocol using common criteria for judging whether an infant passed a hearing screening. Infants were tested in the hospital, and those either failing the in-hospital screening or who were not tested in the hospital (missed) were asked to return 4 to 6 wk after hospital discharge for outpatient rescreening. Those infants failing the outpatient rescreening were referred for diagnostic auditory brain stem response testing. Each hospital used its own audiological equipment and criteria to determine whether a particular infant had a hearing loss. All data were collected and analyzed for individual hospitals, as well as totaled across all hospitals. Data were analyzed in terms of year of program operation, nursery type, and geographic region. Seventy-two percent of infants who failed the in-hospital screening returned for outpatient testing. The percentage of in-hospital fails returning for retesting was significantly higher than the percentage of in-hospital misses returning for retesting. The percentage of infants returning for retesting increased with successive years of program operation. Some differences were noted in the percentage of infants returning for retesting among hospitals and geographic regions of the state. Some differences in outpatient outcome measures also were noted between infants originally born into the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and the well-baby nursery (WBN). The percentage of infants from the NICU who returned for retesting was slightly higher than that for infants from the WBN. The percentage of infants from the WBN passing the outpatient rescreening was higher than that for the NICU infants. The overall prevalence of hearing loss was 1.96/1000, with that in the NICU being 8/1000 and that in the WBN being 0.9/1000. Positive predictive value for permanent hearing loss based on inpatient screening was approximately 4% and based on outpatient rescreening was approximately 22%. Several outpatient outcome measures changed with successive years of program operation, suggesting that programs improve over time. Also, some outpatient outcome measures differ between NICU and WBN populations. The differences noted across regions of the state in the percentage of infants returning for outpatient retesting require further research to determine whether differences are due to demographic and/or procedural differences.

1 July 1991 in Circulation Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MHM J Horgan
M J Horgan
Joaquim PinheiroJoaquim Pinheiro
Joaquim Pinheiro
AMA B Malik
A B Malik
Endothelins are endothelial cell-derived peptides with potent vasoconstrictor properties. We investigated the actions of porcine/human endothelin-1 (ET-1) on the microvasculature of the guinea pig lung perfused at constant flow with Ringers-albumin. We measured the perfusion pressure, distribution of pulmonary vascular resistance (using the double occlusion method), lung weight change, and the pulmonary capillary filtration coefficient. At concentrations of greater than or equal to 10(-10) M, ET-1 produced dose-dependent increases in mean pulmonary artery pressure (EC50, approximately 10(-9.5) M), which were rapid in onset and biphasic (first phase peaking at 1-2 minutes; second phase peaking at 10-15 minutes) up to 60 minutes of the perfusion period. The vasoconstrictor response was sustained for the 60-minute perfusion period. The pulmonary vasoconstriction was inhibited by pretreatment with indomethacin (10(-5) M), the thromboxane A2 receptor antagonist SQ-29,548 (4 x 10(-6) M), or papaverine (10(-5) M). Nifedipine (10(-5) or 10(-7) M) had no effect on the first phase but prevented the second phase of the vasoconstriction. The vasoconstriction was primarily the result of a 10-fold increase in pulmonary venous resistance. Pulmonary edema developed after ET-1 challenge because of the venoconstriction and the resultant pulmonary capillary hypertension. However, the pulmonary capillary filtration coefficient was unchanged, indicating that pulmonary vascular permeability did not increase. ET-1 also had no effect on transendothelial 125I-albumin flux. The results indicate that ET-1 is a potent thromboxane-dependent venoconstrictor in the guinea pig lung.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

1 January 2014 in Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Joaquim PinheiroJoaquim Pinheiro
Joaquim Pinheiro
SFSusan A. Furdon
Susan A. Furdon
SBSusan Boynton
Susan Boynton
RDRobin Dugan
Robin Dugan
CRChristine Reu-Donlon
Christine Reu-Donlon
SJSharon Jensen
Sharon Jensen
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Hypothermia during delivery room stabilization of very low birth weight (VLBW) newborns is independently associated with mortality, yet it occurred frequently both in collaborative networks and at our institution. We aimed to attain admission temperatures in the target range of 36°C to 38°C in ≥90% of inborn VLBW neonates through implementation of a thermoregulation bundle. METHODS: This quality improvement project extended over 60 consecutive months, using sequential plan–do–check–act cycles. During the 14 baseline months, we standardized temperature measurements and developed the Operation Toasty Tot thermoregulation bundle (including consistent head and torso wrapping with plastic, warmed blankets, and a closed stabilization room). We introduced this bundle in month 15 and added servo-controlled, battery-powered radiant warmers for stabilization and transfer in month 21. We provided results and feedback to staff throughout, using simple graphics and control charts. RESULTS: There were 164 inborn VLBW babies before and 477 after bundle implementation. Introduction and optimization of the bundle decreased the incidence of hypothermia, with rates remaining in the target range for the last 13 study months. The incidence of temperatures >38°C was ∼2% both before and after bundle implementation. CONCLUSIONS: This thermoregulation bundle resulted in sustained improvement in normothermia rates during delivery room stabilization of VLBW newborns. Our benchmark goal of ≥90% admission temperatures above 36°C was met without increasing hyperthermia rates. Because these results compare favorably with those of recently published research or improvement collaboratives, we aim to maintain our performance through routine surveillance of admission temperatures.

1 February 1993 in Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Joaquim PinheiroJoaquim Pinheiro
Joaquim Pinheiro
SFSue Furdon
Sue Furdon
LOLuis F. Ochoa
Luis F. Ochoa
Local anesthesia decreases physiologic responses to pain in neonates but has not been used routinely during lumbar punctures in newborns, as it might obscure anatomical landmarks. However, local anesthesia may decrease newborns' struggling during lumbar puncture, thus facilitating the procedure and increasing its success rate. The success rate of lumbar punctures was compared in neonates allocated prospectively to 0.2 to 0.5 mL of 1% lidocaine anesthesia (n = 48) or a control group (n = 52). Newborns were held in a modified lateral recumbent postion (neck not flexed) and their struggling response to the various steps in the lumbar puncture was scored by the holder. The newborns' struggling motion score increased in response to lidocaine injection, but response to the subsequent spinal needle insertion was significantly decreased. Despite this decreased motion, no differences were noted in the number of attempts per lumbar puncture (1.9 ± 0.2 [SEM] in lidocaine and 2.1 ± 0.2 in control groups), rate of lumbar puncture failure (15% in lidocaine and 19% in control groups), or the number of traumatic lumbar punctures (46% in both groups). The success rate of lumbar puncture was not dependent on level of training of physicians performing the procedure. No acute complications, cerebrospinal fluid contamination, or subsequent meningitis was noted in either group. It is concluded that local anesthesia with lidocaine decreases the degree of struggling but does not alter the success rate of lumbar puncture in neonates. The practice of withholding lidocaine anesthesia from neonates undergoing lumbar punctures cannot be justified by arguing that it makes the procedure more difficult to perform.