Alessandro Pozzi

Prof. Alessandro Pozzi

Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Rome 'Tor Vergata', 00037 Rome, Italy

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2020 in Journal of Prosthodontic Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LALorenzo Arcuri
Lorenzo Arcuri
APAlessandro Pozzi
Alessandro Pozzi
FLFabrizio Lio
Fabrizio Lio
EREric Rompen
Eric Rompen
WZWerner Zechner
Werner Zechner
ANAlessandra Nardi
Alessandra Nardi
To evaluate the influence of implant scanbody (ISB) material, position and operator on the accuracy of a confocal microscopy intraoral scanning (IOS) for complete-arch implant impression. An edentulous maxillary model with 6 internal hexagonal connection analogues was scanned with an extraoral optical scanner to achieve a reference file. Three ISBs made of different materials (polyetheretherketone (Pk), titanium (T) and Pk with a titanium base (Pkt)) were scanned with IOS by 3 operators. The resulting 45 test files were aligned to the reference file with a best fit algorithm. Linear (ΔX, ΔY and ΔZ-axis) and angular deviations (ΔANGLE) were assessed. Absolute values of the linear discrepancies were summed up to obtain a global measure of linear absolute error (ΔASS). Influence of ISB material, position and operator was statistically assessed using the mixed general linear model. At multivariate analysis, whenΔASS was considered as response variable, it was identified a significant influence of material (p<0.0001) and position (p=0.0009) while no significant operator effect was detected. When ΔANGLE was considered as response variable, material and position significantly influenced the expected ΔANGLE (p=0.0232 and p<0.0001) and no operator effect was identified. The investigated IOS for complete-arch digital impression was influenced by the ISB material with peek reporting the best results on both linear and angular measurements followed by titanium, peek-titanium resulting as the less accurate. Implant angulation affected significantly the linear deviations while implant position the angular deviations. Operator did not show any significant effect on the IOS accuracy.

18 February 2022 in Journal of Dentistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
APAlessandro Pozzi
Alessandro Pozzi
Lorenzo ArcuriLorenzo Arcuri
Lorenzo Arcuri
FLFabrizio Lio
Fabrizio Lio
APAndrea Papa
Andrea Papa
ANAlessandra Nardi
Alessandra Nardi
JLJimmy Londono
Jimmy Londono

1 June 2012 in Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
APAlessandro Pozzi
Alessandro Pozzi
EAEnrico Agliardi
Enrico Agliardi
Marco TallaricoMarco Tallarico
Marco Tallarico
ABAlberto Barlattani
Alberto Barlattani

5 August 2013 in Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
APAlessandro Pozzi
Alessandro Pozzi
SHStefan Holst
Stefan Holst
GFGiacomo Fabbri
Giacomo Fabbri
Marco TallaricoMarco Tallarico
Marco Tallarico

24 July 2023 in Clinical Oral Implants Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
APAlessandro Pozzi
Alessandro Pozzi
PCPaolo Carosi
Paolo Carosi
GGGerman O. Gallucci
German O. Gallucci
KNKatalin Nagy
Katalin Nagy
ANAlessandra Nardi
Alessandra Nardi
LALorenzo Arcuri
Lorenzo Arcuri

9 August 2012 in Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EAEnrico L. Agliardi
Enrico L. Agliardi
APAlessandro Pozzi
Alessandro Pozzi
CSChristian F. J. Stappert
Christian F. J. Stappert
RBRiccardo Benzi
Riccardo Benzi
DRDavide Romeo
Davide Romeo
GEGherlone Felice Enrico
Gherlone Felice Enrico