Heinz Jacobs

Dr. Heinz Jacobs

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

38Years (1989-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 October 2014 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SASilvia Ariotti
Silvia Ariotti
MHMarc A. Hogenbirk
Marc A. Hogenbirk
FDFeline E. Dijkgraaf
Feline E. Dijkgraaf
LVLindy L. Visser
Lindy L. Visser
MHMirjam E. Hoekstra
Mirjam E. Hoekstra
TSTon N. Schumacher
Ton N. Schumacher
Resident memory T cells sound the alarm: Immunological memory protects against reinfection. Resident memory T cells (T RM ) are long-lived and remain in the tissues where they first encountered a pathogen (see the Perspective by Carbone and Gebhardt). Schenkel et al. and Ariotti et al. found that CD8 + T RM cells act like first responders in the female reproductive tissue or the skin of mice upon antigen reencounter. By secreting inflammatory proteins, T RM cells rapidly activated local immune cells to respond, so much so that they protected against infection with an unrelated pathogen. Iijima and Iwasaki found that CD4 + T RM cells protected mice against reinfection with intravaginal herpes simplex virus 2. Science , this issue p. 98 , p. 101 , p. 93 ; see also p. 40

3 May 2013 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CGCarmen Gerlach
Carmen Gerlach
JRJan C. Rohr
Jan C. Rohr
LPLeïla Perié
Leïla Perié
NRNienke van Rooij
Nienke van Rooij
JHJeroen W. J. van Heijst
Jeroen W. J. van Heijst
TSTon N. M. Schumacher
Ton N. M. Schumacher
Dynamic Protection: During an immune response, CD8 + T cells are recruited to provide protection. Most cells differentiate into short-lived effectors that help to clear the pathogen, whereas others form long-lived memory cells to protect against reinfection. Gerlach et al. (p. 635 , published online 14 March) and Buchholz et al. (p. 630 , published online 14 March) used in vivo fate mapping of mouse T cells with a defined specificity during a bacterial infection to show that the dynamics of the single-cell response are not uniform. The response of a particular T cell population is the average of a small number of clones that expand greatly (“large clones”) and many clones that only proliferate at low amounts (“small clones”). The memory pool arises largely from small clones whereas effectors are primarily made up of large clones.

1 July 1998 in Immunity
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YFYosho Fukita
Yosho Fukita
HJHeinz Jacobs
Heinz Jacobs
KRKlaus Rajewsky
Klaus Rajewsky

22 June 2010 in The EMBO Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RWRoel H Wilting
Roel H Wilting
EYEva Yanover
Eva Yanover
MHMarinus R Heideman
Marinus R Heideman
HJHeinz Jacobs
Heinz Jacobs
JHJames Horner
James Horner
JDJan‐Hermen Dannenberg
Jan‐Hermen Dannenberg
Histone deacetylases (HDACs) counterbalance acetylation of lysine residues, a protein modification involved in numerous biological processes. Here, Hdac1 and Hdac2 conditional knock‐out alleles were used to study the function of class I Hdac1 and Hdac2 in cell cycle progression and haematopoietic differentiation. Combined deletion of Hdac1 and Hdac2, or inactivation of their deacetylase activity in primary or oncogenic‐transformed fibroblasts, results in a senescence‐like G1 cell cycle arrest, accompanied by up‐regulation of the cyclin‐dependent kinase inhibitor p21Cip. Notably, concomitant genetic inactivation of p53 or p21Cip indicates that Hdac1 and Hdac2 regulate p53–p21Cip‐independent pathways critical for maintaining cell cycle progression. In vivo , we show that Hdac1 and Hdac2 are not essential for liver homeostasis. In contrast, total levels of Hdac1 and Hdac2 in the haematopoietic system are critical for erythrocyte‐megakaryocyte differentiation. Dual inactivation of Hdac1 and Hdac2 results in apoptosis of megakaryocytes and thrombocytopenia. Together, these data indicate that Hdac1 and Hdac2 have overlapping functions in cell cycle regulation and haematopoiesis. In addition, this work provides insights into mechanism‐based toxicities observed in patients treated with HDAC inhibitors.

13 February 2006 in Journal of Experimental Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JJJacob G. Jansen
Jacob G. Jansen
PLPetra Langerak
Petra Langerak
ATAnastasia Tsaalbi-Shtylik
Anastasia Tsaalbi-Shtylik
PBPaul van Den Berk
Paul van Den Berk
HJHeinz Jacobs
Heinz Jacobs
NWNiels de Wind
Niels de Wind
Somatic hypermutation of Ig genes enables B cells of the germinal center to generate high-affinity immunoglobulin variants. Key intermediates in somatic hypermutation are deoxyuridine lesions, introduced by activation-induced cytidine deaminase. These lesions can be processed further to abasic sites by uracil DNA glycosylase. Mutagenic replication of deoxyuridine, or of its abasic derivative, by translesion synthesis polymerases is hypothesized to underlie somatic hypermutation. Rev1 is a translesion synthesis polymerase that in vitro incorporates uniquely deoxycytidine opposite deoxyuridine and abasic residues. To investigate a role of Rev1 in mammalian somatic hypermutation we have generated mice deficient for Rev1. Although Rev1−/− mice display transient growth retardation, proliferation of Rev1−/− LPS-stimulated B cells is indistinguishable from wild-type cells. In mutated Ig genes from Rev1−/− mice, C to G transversions were virtually absent in the nontranscribed (coding) strand and reduced in the transcribed strand. This defect is associated with an increase of A to T, C to A, and T to C substitutions. These results indicate that Rev1 incorporates deoxycytidine residues, most likely opposite abasic nucleotides, during somatic hypermutation. In addition, loss of Rev1 causes compensatory increase in mutagenesis by other translesion synthesis polymerases.

1 April 2013 in Journal of Experimental Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JCJonathan M. Coquet
Jonathan M. Coquet
JRJulie C. Ribot
Julie C. Ribot
NBNikolina Bąbała
Nikolina Bąbała
SMSabine Middendorp
Sabine Middendorp
GHGerda van der Horst
Gerda van der Horst
JBJannie Borst
Jannie Borst
CD4+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Treg cells) are largely autoreactive yet escape clonal deletion in the thymus. We demonstrate here that CD27–CD70 co-stimulation in the thymus rescues developing Treg cells from apoptosis and thereby promotes Treg cell generation. Genetic ablation of CD27 or its ligand CD70 reduced Treg cell numbers in the thymus and peripheral lymphoid organs, whereas it did not alter conventional CD4+Foxp3− T cell numbers. The CD27–CD70 pathway was not required for pre-Treg cell generation, Foxp3 induction, or mature Treg cell function. Rather, CD27 signaling enhanced positive selection of Treg cells within the thymus in a cell-intrinsic manner. CD27 signals promoted the survival of thymic Treg cells by inhibiting the mitochondrial apoptosis pathway. CD70 was expressed on Aire− and Aire+ medullary thymic epithelial cells (mTECs) and on dendritic cells (DCs) in the thymic medulla. CD70 on both mTECs and DCs contributed to Treg cell development as shown in BM chimera experiments with CD70-deficient mice. In vitro experiments indicated that CD70 on the CD8α+ subset of thymic DCs promoted Treg cell development. Our data suggest that mTECs and DCs form dedicated niches in the thymic medulla, in which CD27–CD70 co-stimulation rescues developing Treg cells from apoptosis, subsequent to Foxp3 induction by TCR and CD28 signals.