Large language models (LLMs) are a compressed repository of a vast corpus of valuable information on which they are trained. Therefore, this work hypothesizes that LLMs such as Llama, Orca, Falcon, and Mistral can be used for misinformation detection by making them cross-check new information with the repository on which they are trained. Accordingly, this paper describes the findings from the investigation of the abilities of LLMs in detecting misinformation on multiple datasets. The results are interpreted using explainable AI techniques such as Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME), SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), and Integrated Gradients. The LLMs themselves are also asked to explain their classification. These complementary approaches aid in better understanding the inner workings of misinformation detection using LLMs and lead to conclusions about their effectiveness at the task. The methodology is generic and nothing specific is assumed for any of the LLMs, so the conclusions apply generally. Primarily, when it comes to misinformation detection, the experiments show that the LLMs are limited by the data on which they are trained.

Machine learning is increasingly and ubiquitously being used in the medical domain. Evaluation metrics like accuracy, precision, and recall may indicate the performance of the models but not necessarily the reliability of their outcomes. This paper assesses the effectiveness of a number of machine learning algorithms applied to an important dataset in the medical domain, specifically, mental health, by employing explainability methodologies. Using multiple machine learning algorithms and model explainability techniques, this work provides insights into the models’ workings to help determine the reliability of the machine learning algorithm predictions. The results are not intuitive. It was found that the models were focusing significantly on less relevant features and, at times, unsound ranking of the features to make the predictions. This paper therefore argues that it is important for research in applied machine learning to provide insights into the explainability of models in addition to other performance metrics like accuracy. This is particularly important for applications in critical domains such as healthcare.

Research expands the boundaries of a subject, economy, and civilization. Peer review is at the heart of research and is understandably an expensive process. This work, with human-in-the-loop, aims to support the research community in multiple ways. It predicts quality, and acceptance, and recommends reviewers. It helps the authors and editors to evaluate research work using machine learning models developed based on a dataset comprising 18,000+ research papers, some of which are from highly acclaimed, top conferences in Artificial Intelligence such as NeurIPS and ICLR, their reviews, aspect scores, and accept/reject decisions. Using machine learning algorithms such as Support Vector Machines, Deep Learning Recurrent Neural Network architectures such as LSTM, a wide variety of pre-trained word vectors using Word2Vec, GloVe, FastText, transformer architecture-based BERT, DistilBERT, Google’s Large Language Model (LLM), PaLM 2, and TF-IDF vectorizer, a comprehensive system is built. For the system to be readily usable and to facilitate future enhancements, a frontend, a Flask server in the cloud, and a NOSQL database at the backend are implemented, making it a complete system. The work is novel in using a unique blend of tools and techniques to address most aspects of building a system to support the peer review process. The experiments result in a 86% test accuracy on acceptance prediction using DistilBERT. Results from other models are comparable, with PaLM-based LLM embeddings achieving 84% accuracy.

Generative AI and multimodal foundation models have fueled a proliferation of fake content on the Internet. This paper investigates if foundation models help detect and thereby contain the spread of fake images. The task of detecting fake images is a formidable challenge owing to its visual nature and intricate analysis. This paper details experiments using four multimodal foundation models, Llava, CLIP, Moondream2, and Gemini 1.5 Flash, to detect fake images. Explainable AI techniques such as Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) and removal-based explanations are used to gain insights into the detection process. The dataset used comprised real images and fake images generated by a generative artificial intelligence tool called MidJourney. Results show that the models can achieve up to a 69% accuracy rate in detecting fake images in an intuitively explainable way, as confirmed by multiple techniques and metrics.

A significant challenge encountered in mmWave and sub-terahertz systems used in 5G and the upcoming 6G networks is the rapid fluctuation in signal quality across various beam directions. Extremely high-frequency waves are highly vulnerable to obstruction, making even slight adjustments in device orientation or the presence of blockers capable of causing substantial fluctuations in link quality along a designated path. This issue poses a major obstacle because numerous applications with low-latency requirements necessitate the precise forecasting of network quality from many directions and cells. The method proposed in this research demonstrates an avant-garde approach for assessing the quality of multi-directional connections in mmWave systems by utilizing the Liquid Time-Constant network (LTC) instead of the conventionally used Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) technique. The method’s validity was tested through an optimistic simulation involving monitoring multi-cell connections at 28 GHz in a scenario where humans and various obstructions were moving arbitrarily. The results with LTC are significantly better than those obtained by conventional approaches such as LSTM. The latter resulted in a test Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) of 3.44 dB, while the former, 0.25 dB, demonstrating a 13-fold improvement. For better interpretability and to illustrate the complexity of prediction, an approximate mathematical expression is also fitted to the simulated signal data using Symbolic Regression.