Kalathur Santhanam

Prof. Kalathur Santhanam

Chemistry and Materials Science and Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

62Years (1965-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 1997 in Chemical Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PNPetr Novák
Petr Novák
KMKlaus Müller
Klaus Müller
Kalathur SanthanamKalathur Santhanam
Kalathur Santhanam
OHOtto Haas
Otto Haas

1 October 1996 in Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PBP.J. Britto
P.J. Britto
Kalathur SanthanamKalathur Santhanam
Kalathur Santhanam
PAP.M. Ajayan
P.M. Ajayan

25 January 2001 in Nano Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JNJ. M. Nugent
J. M. Nugent
Kalathur SanthanamKalathur Santhanam
Kalathur Santhanam
ARA. Rubio
A. Rubio
PAP. M. Ajayan
P. M. Ajayan

1 January 1965 in Journal of the American Chemical Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Kalathur SanthanamKalathur Santhanam
Kalathur Santhanam
ABAllen J. Bard
Allen J. Bard

1 September 1975 in Journal of the American Chemical Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CSConrad O. Schmakel
Conrad O. Schmakel
Kalathur SanthanamKalathur Santhanam
Kalathur Santhanam
PEPhilip J. Elving
Philip J. Elving

1 July 1981 in Journal of the Electrochemical Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YCYih‐Wen D. Chen
Yih‐Wen D. Chen
Kalathur SanthanamKalathur Santhanam
Kalathur Santhanam
ABAllen J. Bard
Allen J. Bard
Iron (III)‐Iron (II) complexes with o‐phenanthroline and related ligands have been examined by electrochemical techniques in aqueous media with respect to their suitability as redox couples for electrochemical energy storage. The iron (II) complexes undergo a rapid 1 electron oxidation at graphite and platinum electrodes to yield iron (III) complexes; these complexes showed varying stabilities depending on the nature of the substituents on the complexes. The iron (II) complexes examined in this study were formed with (i) monodentate, (ii) bidentate, or (iii) tridentate ligands. The redox couples have a higher value which has been a positive consideration in the storage. Although the aquo iron (II)‐ iron (III) couple has an less than the complexes, it certainly has shown greater promise in terms of storage stability. The kinetics of iron (II) complexation has been followed by cyclic voltammetry.