Treatment of locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma involves a multidisciplinary approach that combines surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic therapy. These curative strategies are associated with significant acute and long-term toxicities. With the emergence of human papillomavirus (HPV) as an etiologic factor associated primarily with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, higher cure rates juxtaposed with substantial treatment-related morbidity and mortality has led to interest in de-escalated therapeutic strategies, with the goal of optimizing oncologic outcomes while reducing treatment-related toxicity. Currently explored strategies include replacing, reducing, or omitting cytotoxic chemotherapy; reducing dose or volume of radiotherapy; and incorporation of less-invasive surgical approaches. Potential biomarkers to select patients for treatment de-escalation include clinical risk stratification, adjuvant de-escalation based on pathologic features, response to induction therapy, and molecular markers. The optimal patient selection and de-escalation strategy is critically important in the evolving treatment of locoregional head and neck cancer. Recently, two large phase III trials, RTOG 1016 and De-ESCALaTE, failed to de-escalate treatment in HPV-associated head and neck cancer by demonstrating inferior outcomes by replacing cisplatin with cetuximab in combination with radiation. This serves as a cautionary tale in the future design of de-escalation trials in this patient population, which will need to leverage toxicity and efficacy endpoints. Our review summarizes completed and ongoing de-escalation trials in head and neck cancer, with particular emphasis on biomarkers for patient selection and clinical trial design. Implications for Practice: The toxicity associated with standard multimodality treatment for head and neck cancer underscores the need to seek less-intensive therapies with a reduced long-term symptom burden through de-escalated treatment paradigms that minimize toxicity while maintaining oncologic control in appropriately selected patients. Controversy regarding the optimal de-escalation strategy and criteria for patient selection for de-escalated therapy has led to multiple parallel strategies undergoing clinical investigation. Well-designed trials that optimize multimodal strategies are needed. Given the absence of positive randomized trials testing de-escalated therapy to date, practicing oncologists should exercise caution and administer established standard-of-care therapy outside the context of a clinical trial.

Importance: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy in human papillomavirus (HPV)–negative locoregionally advanced (LA) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) appears promising, yet its role in nonsurgical treatment for head and neck cancer remains undefined. Neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy followed by response-stratified de-escalated chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in HPV-negative LA stage IVa/b HNSCC may improve treatment efficacy while reducing treatment-related toxic effects.Objective: To determine the deep response rate and tolerability of neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy followed by response-stratified CRT in nonvirally mediated stage IVa/b HNSCC.Design, Setting, and Participants: In this investigator-initiated phase 2 nonrandomized clinical trial conducted at a single academic center, patients with stage IVa/b (American Joint Committee on Cancer Tumor Classification, 8th edition) HPV-negative LA HNSCC were enrolled between 2019 and 2022. Data were analyzed from February 2023 to January 2024.Interventions: The DEPEND trial evaluated neoadjuvant nivolumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel, followed by response-stratified CRT. Patients with 50% or greater reduction per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 received de-escalated CRT to 66 Gy with elimination of elective nodal volumes; patients with less than 50% reduction received standard CRT to 70 to 75 Gy. Adjuvant nivolumab was administered for 9 cycles.Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was deep response rate (DRR; 50% or greater shrinkage per RECIST version 1.1) following neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), locoregional control, and distant control. Exploratory end points included acute toxic effects in patients who received response-adapted de-escalated CRT.Results: Of 36 included patients, 28 (78%) were male, and the median (range) age was 58.9 (27-77) years. All patients started treatment and were available for analysis. The median (range) follow-up was 20 (13-40) months. The primary end point was met, with a DRR following neoadjuvant nivolumab/chemotherapy of 53% (95% CI, 35-70). The objective response rate was 86% (95% CI, 71-95). A total of 19 received de-escalated CRT and 16 received standard CRT. PFS and OS at 2 years were 66% (95% CI, 34-76) and 73% (95% CI, 52-86), respectively. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events for de-escalated and standard CRT were mucositis (14 of 19 [74%] and 15 of 16 [94%], respectively), radiation dermatitis (13 of 19 [68%] and 14 of 16 [88%], respectively), and dry mouth (7 of 19 [37%] and 10 of 16 [63%], respectively).Conclusions and Relevance: In this phase 2 nonrandomized clinical trial, neoadjuvant nivolumab/chemotherapy led to deep responses in 53% of patients with HPV-negative LA stage IVa/b HNSCC, and response-adapted de-escalated CRT led to favorable survival with lower acute toxic effects among deep responders.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03944915

PURPOSE: Despite advances in immunotherapy, unresectable recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer (HNC) carries a poor prognosis, and effective treatments are needed. As nectin-4 is widely expressed in HNC, enfortumab vedotin (EV), a nectin-4–directed antibody-drug conjugate, was explored in HNC in EV-202 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04225117 ). METHODS: This open-label, multicohort, phase II study evaluated intravenous EV 1.25 mg/kg on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle. In the HNC cohort, eligible patients had recurrent/metastatic HNC and had received platinum-based therapy for locally advanced/metastatic disease and a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor. The primary end point was investigator-assessed confirmed objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST version 1.1. Secondary end points were investigator-assessed duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR), and progression-free survival (PFS); overall survival (OS); and safety. RESULTS: The primary analysis included 46 patients; all received EV (median follow-up, 9.3 months). Most patients (52.2%) had ≥3 previous lines of systemic therapy in the metastatic setting. Confirmed ORR was 23.9%, DCR was 56.5%, and median DOR was not reached (median DOR was 9.4 months at a later data cutoff [median follow-up, 11.3 months]). Median PFS and OS were 3.9 and 6.0 months, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurring in >20% of patients were alopecia (28.3%), fatigue (26.1%), and peripheral sensory neuropathy (23.9%). Sixteen patients (34.8%) experienced grade ≥3 TRAEs; anemia and decreased neutrophil count occurred in ≥1 patient (both n = 2; 4.3%). CONCLUSION: EV demonstrated antitumor activity in heavily pretreated HNC. Safety was consistent with the known safety profile of EV; no new safety signals were identified. These data support further evaluation of EV for advanced HNC not amenable to definitive local therapy.

The survival rate for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) diagnosed with cervical lymph node (cLN) or distant metastasis is low. Genomic alterations in the HRAS oncogene are associated with advanced tumor stage and metastasis in HNC. Elucidation of the molecular mechanisms by which mutated HRAS (HRASmut) facilitates HNC metastasis could lead to improved treatment options for patients. Here, we examined metastasis driven by mutant HRAS in vitro and in vivo using HRASmut human HNC cell lines, patient-derived xenografts, and a novel HRASmut syngeneic model. Genetic and pharmacological manipulations indicated that HRASmut was sufficient to drive invasion in vitro and metastasis in vivo. Targeted proteomic analysis showed that HRASmut promoted AXL expression via suppressing the Hippo pathway and stabilizing YAP1 activity. Pharmacological blockade of HRAS signaling with the farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib activated the Hippo pathway and reduced the nuclear export of YAP1, thus suppressing YAP1-mediated AXL expression and metastasis. AXL was required for HRASmut cells to migrate and invade in vitro and to form regional cLN and lung metastases in vivo. In addition, AXL-depleted HRASmut tumors displayed reduced lymphatic and vascular angiogenesis in the primary tumor. Tipifarnib treatment also regulated AXL expression and attenuated VEGFA and VEGFC expression, thus regulating tumor-induced vascular formation and metastasis. Our results indicate that YAP1 and AXL are crucial factors for HRASmut-induced metastasis and that tipifarnib treatment can limit the metastasis of HNC tumors with HRAS mutations by enhancing YAP1 cytoplasmic sequestration and downregulating AXL expression. Significance: Mutant HRAS drives metastasis of head and neck cancer by switching off the Hippo pathway to activate the YAP1–AXL axis and to stimulate lymphovascular angiogenesis.

The proto-oncogene MYC encodes a nuclear transcription factor that has an important role in a variety of cellular processes, such as cell cycle progression, proliferation, metabolism, adhesion, apoptosis, and therapeutic resistance. MYC amplification is consistently observed in aggressive forms of several solid malignancies and correlates with poor prognosis and distant metastases. While the tumorigenic effects of MYC in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are well known, the molecular mechanisms by which the amplification of this gene may confer treatment resistance, especially to immune checkpoint inhibitors, remains under-investigated. Here we present a unique case of a patient with recurrent/metastatic (R/M) HNSCC who, despite initial response to nivolumab-based treatment, developed rapidly progressive metastatic disease after the acquisition of MYC amplification. We conducted comparative transcriptomic analysis of this patient’s tumor at baseline and upon progression to interrogate potential molecular processes through which MYC may confer resistance to immunotherapy and/or chemoradiation and used TCGA-HNSC dataset and an institutional cohort to further explore clinicopathologic features and key molecular networks associated with MYC amplification in HNSCC. This study highlights MYC amplification as a potential mechanism of immune checkpoint inhibitor resistance and suggest its use as a predictive biomarker and potential therapeutic target in R/M HNSCC.