The collection and dissemination of vertebrate ichnological data is struggling to keep up with techniques that are becoming commonplace in the wider palaeontological field. A standard protocol is required to ensure that data is recorded, presented and archived in a manner that will be useful both to contemporary researchers, and to future generations. Primarily, our aim is to make the 3D capture of ichnological data standard practice, and to provide guidance on how such 3D data can be communicated effectively (both via the literature and other means) and archived openly and in perpetuity. We recommend capture of 3D data, and the presentation of said data in the form of photographs, false‐colour images, and interpretive drawings. Raw data (3D models of traces) should always be provided in a form usable by other researchers (i.e. in an open format). If adopted by the field as a whole, the result will be a more robust and uniform literature, supplemented by unparalleled availability of datasets for future workers.

We compare theropod footprints with elongate metatarsal prints from central Italy with known autopod structures in major theropod groups, in order to more accurately define the trackmaker attribution. Our work, using morphometric analysis, shows the considerable potential of explorative methods such as PCA (principal component analysis) and cluster analysis when describing important characters for a given taxonomic group (body and ichnofossils) and identifying important anatomical regions. Moreover, the results of the analysis suggest that the putative trackmaker is likely a member of Ornithomimosauria, with significant affinities in the posterior autopod structure with the genus Struthiomimus. The fundamental importance of integrating both osteological and ichnological data, when investigating locomotor and behavioural hypotheses, is highlighted. This approach could also contribute positively to the complex cognitive process of trackmaker identification and be favourable for the attainment of a more natural definition of ichnotaxa.

A study carried out on some excellently preserved footprints has revealed the vital importance of functionality analysis, together with morphological analyses, in settling systematics and attribution issues in ichnological studies. To test the alleged reliability of functionality studies in tetrapod ichnology, a careful analysis of numerous specimens (both trackways and isolated footprints) of the Gotha collection, referred to the Permian ichnotaxa Ichniotherium and Dimetropus, has been carried out. The method, in addition to the classical ichnological protocol, includes a careful and basic analysis of the differential depth of the impression to evaluate biomechanics and functional potentiality of the putative trackmaker in the light of osteological structures. The analysis has led to the recognition of two well-separated particular functionalities (over a complete locomotion cycle), sharply distinguishable in Ichniotherium and Dimetropus. The Ichniotherium trackmaker presents a functional axis in the fore and hind limbs moved always along the medial side during the stroke progression; in Dimetropus trackmaker there are at least two functional axes, the first moved laterally in the initial stroke phase and the second moved medially during the maximum load phase. Those different functionalities are intimately linked to the particular osteological characters present in diadectids and non-therapsid synapsids. Thus, functionality analysis in the ichnological practice is a valuable tool strongly recommended for use whenever possible.

A new ichnospecies is named as Dimetropus osageorum n. isp. within the ichnogenus Dimetropus Romer and Price, 1940. The new ichnotaxon comes from the Lower Permian Midco Member of the Wellington Formation, cropping out near Perry, Noble Co. (Oklahoma, USA), and differs from congeneric ichnospecies in the apparent heteropody and in the proportionally shorter digits. The characters of the new ichnotaxon, together with comparative analysis of footprints and of known skeletal remains, suggest referral of the trackmaker to the Caseidae, although edaphosaurid affinities cannot be excluded. Tracks referred to Dimetropus exhibit wide variation, and their respective trackmakers may be ascribed to an accordingly wide range of different zoological taxa among non-therapsid Synapsida and not only to Sphenacodontidae as has been generally believed. At the same time, the process of attributing ichnotaxa, on the basis of well preserved tracks and by comparison with known skeletal remains, is validated.

Based on the integration of laser scans, sedimentology, geochemistry, archeobotany, geometric morphometrics and photogrammetry, here we present evidence testifying that a Palaeolithic group of people explored a deep cave in northern Italy about 14 ky cal. BP. Ichnological data enable us to shed light on individual and group level behavior, social relationship, and mode of exploration of the uneven terrain. Five individuals, two adults, an adolescent and two children, entered the cave barefoot and illuminated the way with a bunch of wooden sticks. Traces of crawling locomotion are documented for the first time in the global human ichnological record. Anatomical details recognizable in the crawling traces show that no clothing was present between limbs and the trampled sediments. Our study demonstrates that very young children (the youngest about 3 years old) were active members of the Upper Palaeolithic populations, even in apparently dangerous and social activities.