zhuandi wu

Dr. zhuandi wu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 July 2020 in Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XHXin Hu
Xin Hu
ZWzhuandi wu
zhuandi wu
ZLZhengying Luo
Zhengying Luo
DBDavid Burner
David Burner
Yong-Bao PanYong-Bao Pan
Yong-Bao Pan
CWCai-Wen Wu
Cai-Wen Wu
The trehalose-6-phosphate synthase (TPS) gene family plays important roles in conferring plant stress resistance, but a comprehensive analysis of the gene family is lacking for sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids). The objective of this study is to document functional classification, evolutionary characterization, and expression profiling of sugarcane TPS gene (ScTPS) family. Nine putative ScTPS genes were identified and assigned to two distinct classes based on gene structure and phylogeny. Phylogenetic analysis showed that 31 TPS genes from Arabidopsis, rice and sugarcane could be divided into five distinct clades, suggesting that there were at least five orthologous groups in monocot and dicot plants. Evolution analysis of TPS genes revealed that TPS family members appeared to have undergone strong negative selection. The strength of the selective pressure differed in most clades, especially Class I TPS genes, experienced significantly stronger negative selection pressure than Class II TPS genes. There were also cis-regulatory elements related to phytohormones and abiotic stresses. Additionally, ScTPS genes were found to exhibit divergent expression in response to simulated drought, salinity, and ABA stresses. Since ScTPS genes function in sugarcane adaptation to environmental stimuli, it might be used as a molecular marker in screening sugarcane germplasm for increased stress resistance.

8 October 2022 in Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZLZhengying Luo
Zhengying Luo
XHXin Hu
Xin Hu
ZWzhuandi wu
zhuandi wu
XLxinlong liu
xinlong liu
CWCai-Wen Wu
Cai-Wen Wu
QZQianchun Zeng
Qianchun Zeng
TGA transcription factor (TF) family genes play a major role in the regulation of plant growth and development as well as in the defense against pathogen attack. Little is known about the TGA family genes and their functions in sugarcane. Here, a total of 16 TGA members were identified in the sugarcane genome by bioinformatic approaches. All members exhibited similar conserved motifs and contained a bZIP domain and a DOG1 domain, except for ShTGA15/16. Phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that 16 ShTGA family genes could be divided into eight clades, and evolved differently from Arabidopsis TGAs. All ShTGA family genes suffered a purifying selection during evolution. A wide range of cis-regulatory elements were found in the promoter of ShTGA genes including hormone regulatory elements, adversity response elements, light responsive elements, and growth and development regulatory elements. Most ShTGA expressions were increased in bud growth and developmental processes except for ShTGA10/11. It is worth noting that the expression of ShTGA13 was decreased after sugarcane was infected with Sporisorium scitamineum, and it was highly expressed in the resistant variety compared to the susceptible variety. Adding IAA, GA3 and SA restored the expression of ShTGA13, suggesting an association with plant hormone regulatory pathways. Our study provides a framework for further functional studies of important ShTGA genes in development and stress response, and uncovered a previously unrecognized role of ShTGA13 in regulating resistance against S. scitamineum.

10 April 2023 in Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FZFenggang Zan
Fenggang Zan
ZWzhuandi wu
zhuandi wu
WWWenzhi Wang
Wenzhi Wang
XHXin Hu
Xin Hu
LFLu Feng
Lu Feng
JGJiawen Guo
Jiawen Guo
Sugarcane is a complex polyploid aneuploid cash crop, and transgenic varieties are important for molecular genetic and traditional breeding approaches. Herein, the sugarcane variety ROC22 served as the receptor, the Bar gene served as a screening marker, and positive and negative fragments of the ScD27.2 gene, upstream of strigolactones (SLs) biosynthesis genes driven by the 35S promoter, were introduced by Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation. Regenerated plants were obtained by co-culture, screening culture, and differentiation induction, and 27 sense and antisense ScD27.2 transgenic seedlings were obtained by herbicide screening. PCR detection and 1% Basta (Glufosinate) application on leaves revealed Bar in all lines, with all testing positive for herbicide application and 23 containing the target gene (positive resistance screening rate = 87.5%). q-PCR and phenotypic analyses showed that ScD27.2 expression, plant height, tiller number, root length, stem diameter, and fresh weight were decreased in transgenic (ScD27.2R-9) compared with non-transgenic (NT and ScD27.2F-2) lines. ScD27.2 expression was downregulated, and growth potential was inhibited. Under 20% PEG treatment, malondialdehyde (MDA) content in ScD27.2R-9 was higher than in NT, while proline content was lower. Under drought stress, ScD27.2 expression, MDA levels, and proline content in ScD27.2F-2 and NT were higher than in non-treated controls, ScD27.2 expression increased with time, and MDA and proline levels also increased. ScD27.2 expression in ScD27.2R-9 decreased under 20% PEG treatment, MDA and proline increased (but not to NT levels), and growth was lower than NT. The 20% PEG treatment also increased the levels of (±)-2′-epi-5-deoxystrigol and (+)-abscisic acid in the rooting culture media of ScD27.2F-2, ScD27.2R-9, and NT lines, but the levels of (+)-abscisic acid content in ScD27.2R-9 was lower than in NT. Thus, interfering with ScD27.2 expression decreased resistance to 20% PEG treatment. ScD27.2 encodes a β-carotene isomerase involved in SLs biosynthesis that might function in sugarcane resistance to drought stress. It explains the role of SLs in sugarcane growth and development and responses to drought stress.

26 November 2020 in Frontiers in Plant Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WWWenzhi Wang
Wenzhi Wang
BYBenpeng Yang
Benpeng Yang
WJWang Jungang
Wang Jungang
XFXiaoyan Feng
Xiaoyan Feng
CFCuilian Feng
Cuilian Feng
ZMZhengqiang Ma
Zhengqiang Ma
This study aimed to prepare the sugar industry for the possible introduction of genetically modified (GM) sugarcane and derived retail sugar products and to address several potential public concerns regarding the characteristics and safety of these products. GM sugarcane lines with integrated Cry1Ab and EPSPS foreign genes were used for GM sugar production. Traditional PCR, real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR), and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were performed in analyzing leaves, stems, and other derived materials during sugar production, such as fibers, clarified juices, filter mud, syrups, molasses, and final GM sugar product. The toxicity of GM sugar was examined with a feeding bioassay using Helicoverpa armigera larvae. PCR and RT-qPCR results showed that the leaves, stems, fibers, juices, syrups, filter mud, molasses, and white granulated sugar from GM sugarcane can be distinguished from those derived from non-GM sugarcane. The RT-qPCR detection method using short amplified product primers was more accurate than the traditional PCR method. Molecular analysis results indicated that trace amounts of DNA residues remain in GM sugar, and thus it can be accurately characterized using molecular analysis methods. ELISA results showed that only the leaves, stems, fibers, and juices sampled from the GM sugarcane differed from those derived from the non-GM sugarcane, indicating that filter mud, syrup, molasses, and white sugar did not contain detectable Cry1Ab and EPSPS proteins. Toxicity analysis showed that the GM sugar was not toxic to the H. armigera larvae. The final results showed that the GM sugar had no active proteins despite containing trace amounts of DNA residues. This finding will help to pave the way for the commercialization of GM sugarcane and production of GM sugar.