TP53 gene is mutated in approximately 80% of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, the prognostic significance of immunohistochemical (IHC)-detected p53 protein expression remains controversial in TNBC. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the association between IHC-detected p53 expression and the prognosis in a cohort of 278 patients with stage I-III triple-negative breast invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), who received surgery at the department of breast surgery in the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from 2010–01 to 2012–12. We found a positive expression ratio of IHC-detected p53 in triple-negative breast IDC of 58.6% (163/278). Furthermore, levels of expression were significantly associated with vessel tumor emboli and higher histologic grade (P = .038, P = .043, respectively), with the highest expression level observed in G3 breast cancer (64.7%). Additionally, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that p53 expression indicated worse overall survival (OS) in the whole cohort (79.6% vs 89.6%, Log-rank test P = .025) as well as in stratified prognostic stage II patients (90.8% vs 100%, Log-rank test P = .027). The mortality risk of p53 expression patients was 2.22 times higher than that of p53 negative patients (HR: 2.222; 95%CI: 1.147–4.308). In addition, p53 expression was also associated with poor disease-free survival (DFS) (76.7% vs 86.8%, P = .020). Cox proportional hazard ratio model showed p53 expression was an independent risk factor for OS (P = .018) and DFS (P = .018) after controlling for tumor size, lymph node status, and vessel tumor emboli. Altogether, our data showed that IHC-detected p53 expression is a promising prognostic candidate for poor survival in triple-negative breast IDC patients. However, more studies are needed to determine if p53 may be applied to clinical practice as a biomarker and/or novel therapeutic target for TNBC.

Breast cancer is the most prevalent malignancy among women. Doxorubicin (Dox) resistance was one of the major obstacles to improving the clinical outcome of breast cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the FABP signaling pathway and Dox resistance in breast cancer. The resistance property of MCF-7/ADR cells was evaluated employing CCK-8, Western blot (WB), and confocal microscopy techniques. The glycolipid metabolic properties of MCF-7 and MCF-7/ADR cells were identified using transmission electron microscopy, PAS, and Oil Red O staining. FABP5 and CaMKII expression levels were assessed through GEO and WB approaches. The intracellular calcium level was determined by flow cytometry. Clinical breast cancer patient’s tumor tissues were evaluated by immunohistochemistry to determine FABP5 and p-CaMKII protein expression. In the presence or absence of FABP5 siRNA or the FABP5-specific inhibitor SBFI-26, Dox resistance was investigated utilizing CCK-8, WB, and colony formation methods, and intracellular calcium level was examined. The binding ability of Dox was explored by molecular docking analysis. The results indicated that the MCF-7/ADR cells we employed were Dox-resistant MCF-7 cells. FABP5 expression was considerably elevated in MCF-7/ADR cells compared to parent MCF-7 cells. FABP5 and p-CaMKII expression were increased in resistant patients than in sensitive individuals. Inhibition of the protein expression of FABP5 by siRNA or inhibitor increased Dox sensitivity in MCF-7/ADR cells and lowered intracellular calcium, PPARγ, and autophagy. Molecular docking results showed that FABP5 binds more powerfully to Dox than the known drug resistance-associated protein P-GP. In summary, the PPARγ and CaMKII axis mediated by FABP5 plays a crucial role in breast cancer chemoresistance. FABP5 is a potentially targetable protein and therapeutic biomarker for the treatment of Dox resistance in breast cancer.

Background: Breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), or ATP-binding cassette subfamily G member 2 (ABCG2), is an ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter that mediates energy-dependent transport of substrate drugs out of the cell. Its overexpression may contribute to intrinsic drug resistance in vitro. However, the current literature has not yet clarified the clinical significance of BCRP/ABCG2 in invasive breast carcinoma. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to validate the expression of BCRP/ABCG2 in invasive breast carcinoma and its role in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: In this study, a pretherapeutic core biopsy was performed in 222 patients. BCRP/ABCG2 expression in carcinoma tissue was measured by immunohistochemistry. BCRP/ABCG2 expression correlations with clinicopathological features, molecular subtypes, and therapy response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were investigated. Results: The results showed that BCRP/ABCG2 was expressed in different molecular subtypes. The proportions of patients with high BCRP/ABCG2 expression were similar in luminal A and luminal B tumors (luminal B, 80%; luminal A, 78%), compared with other molecular subtypes (triple-negative, 63%; HER2+, 58%, p = 0.05). BCRP/ABCG2 expression and the number of lymphatic metastases (p = 0.001) and tumor size (p = 0.011) demonstrated a statistically significant correlation. Low BCRP/ABCG2 expression was associated with an increased pathological complete response (pCR) rate of 38%, higher than the 19% in tumors with high BCRP/ABCG2 expression (p = 0.002). In multivariable analysis, BCRP/ABCG2 and hormone receptor (HR) expression were identified as independent risk factors of pCR (p = 0.003 and p = 0.013, respectively). Conclusions: BCRP/ABCG2 is highly expressed in HR-positive breast cancer. High BCRP/ABCG2 expression is associated with lymphatic metastasis, tumor size, and poor pCR. BCRP/ABCG2 may be a novel potential biomarker that can predict clinical progression and therapy response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.