Purpose: Antibiotics are commonly used during pregnancy. However, physiological changes during pregnancy can affect the pharmacokinetics of drugs, including antibiotics, used during this period. Pharmacokinetic evaluations have shed light on how antibiotics are affected during pregnancy and have influenced dosing recommendations in this context. Methods: A narrative review was conducted and included reports providing data reflecting drug distribution and exposure in the context of pregnancy. Results: Pharmacokinetic parameters of antibiotics in pregnancy and transplacental passage of antibiotics are comprehensively presented. Conclusions: Knowledge about the impact on pharmacokinetics and fetal exposure is especially helpful for complicated or severe infections, including intra-amniotic infection and sepsis in pregnancy, where both mother and fetus are at risk. Further studies are warranted to consolidate the role of therapeutic drug monitoring in complicated or severe infections in pregnant patients.

Previous clinical trials for drug-susceptible tuberculosis (DS-TB) have shown that first-line treatment with doses of rifampicin up to 40 mg/kg are safe and increase the early treatment response for young adults with pulmonary tuberculosis. This may lead to a shorter treatment duration for those persons with TB and a good baseline prognosis, or increased treatment success for vulnerable subgroups (age > 60, diabetes, malnutrition, HIV, hepatitis B or hepatitis C coinfection, TB meningitis, stable chronic liver diseases). Here, we describe the design of a phase 2b/c clinical study under the hypothesis that rifampicin at 35 mg/kg is as safe for these vulnerable groups as for the participants included in previous clinical trials. RIAlta is an interventional, open-label, multicenter, prospective clinical study with matched historical controls comparing the standard DS-TB treatment (isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol) with rifampicin at 35 mg/kg (HR³⁵ZE group) vs. rifampicin at 10 mg/kg (historical HR¹⁰ZE group). The primary outcome is the incidence of grade ≥ 3 Adverse Events or Severe Adverse Events. A total of 134 participants will be prospectively included, and compared with historical matched controls with at least a 1:1 proportion. This will provide a power of 80% to detect non-inferiority with a margin of 8%. This study will provide important information for subgroups of patients that are more vulnerable to TB bad outcomes and/or treatment toxicity. Despite limitations such as non-randomized design and the use of historical controls, the results of this trial may inform the design of future more inclusive clinical trials, and improve the management of tuberculosis in subgroups of patients for whom scientific evidence is still scarce. Trial registration: EudraCT 2020-003146-36, NCT04768231.

Background: Higher than standard doses of rifampicin could improve the treatment outcome of drug-susceptible tuberculosis (TB) without compromising the safety of patients. Methods: We performed a systematic review of prospective clinical studies including adults with pulmonary and extrapulmonary TB receiving rifampicin doses above 10 mg/kg/day. We extracted the data on overall adverse events (AE), hepatic AE, sputum culture conversion (SCC) at week 8, recurrence, mortality, and pharmacokinetics. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) using a random-effects model. Results: In 19 studies, 2033 out of 3654 participants received rifampicin doses higher than 10 mg/kg/day. The NMA showed an increased risk of overall and hepatic AE for the 40 mg/kg/day dose (risk ratio [RR] 4.8, 95% credibility interval [CrI]: 1.1, 25, and 15.00; 95% CrI: 1.1, 58.0, respectively), but no other doses, including 50 mg/kg/day showed such an increase. Increasing doses improved sputum culture conversion at week 8 (RR 1.3, 95% CrI: 1.1, 1.7 for SCC with 35 mg/kg/day). Conclusions: Optimal doses of rifampicin may be between 25 and 35 mg/kg/day, but should be tailored at the individual or, at least, at the population level.

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to evaluate treatment in patients on current programmatic multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) regimen and verify eligibility for the 9-month regimen and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with MDR-TB receiving standardised regimen at the German Nepal TB Project Clinic, Nepal, between 2014 and 2016. Eligibility for the 9-month regimen and indications for TDM were evaluated. Results: Out of 107 available patients’ medical records, 98 were included. In this centre, the MDR-TB treatment success rates were 69.0% in 2015, 86.6% in 2016 and 86.5% in 2017. The median time to sputum smear conversion was 60 days (60–90 IQR) and culture conversion was 60 days (60–90 IQR). Observed side effects did not impact treatment outcomes. No difference in treatment success rates was observed between patients with predisposing risk factors and those without. Only 49% (36/74) of patients were eligible for the 9-month regimen and 23 patients for TDM according to American Thoracic Society guideline criteria. Conclusions: Nepalese patients with MDR-TB on ambulatory care had good treatment outcome after programmatic treatment. Implementation of the new WHO oral MDR-TB treatment regimen may further improve treatment results. The 9-month regimen and TDM should be considered as part of programmatic care.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the difference in drug exposure of rifampicin in native versus non-native Paraguayan populations using dried blood spots (DBS) samples collected utilizing a limited sampling strategy. This was a prospective pharmacokinetic study that enrolled hospitalized tuberculosis (TB) patients from both native and non-native populations receiving oral rifampicin 10 mg/kg once-daily dosing. Steady-state DBS samples were collected at 2, 4, and 6 h after intake of rifampicin. The area under the time concentration curve 0–24 h (AUC_0–24) was calculated using a Bayesian population PK model. Rifampicin AUC_0–24 < 38.7 mg*h/L was considered as low. The probability of target attainment (PTA) was calculated using AUC_0–24/MIC > 271 as a target and estimated MIC values of 0.125 and 0.25 mg/L. In total, 50 patients were included. Native patients (n = 30) showed comparable drug exposure to the non-natives (n = 20), median AUC_0–24 24.7 (17.1–29.5 IQR) and 21.6 (15.0–35.4 IQR) mg*h/L (p = 0.66), respectively. Among total patients, only 16% (n = 8) had a rifampicin AUC_0–24 > 38.7 mg*h/L. Furthermore, PTA analysis showed that only 12 (24%) of the patients met a target AUC_0–24 /MIC ≥ 271, assuming an MIC of 0.125 mg/L, which plummeted to 0% at a wild-type MIC of 0.25 mg/L. We successfully used DBS and limited sampling for the AUC_0–24 estimation of rifampicin. Currently, our group, the EUSAT-RCS consortium, is preparing a prospective multinational, multicenter phase IIb clinical trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of high-dose rifampicin (35 mg/kg) in adult subjects using the DBS technique for AUC_0–24 estimation.