Department of Integrative Biology and Pharmacology, McGovern Medical School, MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA
Dr. Pamela Wenzel
Department of Integrative Biology and Pharmacology, McGovern Medical School, MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA
Adult bone marrow contains numerous adipocytes, whose numbers correlate inversely with the haematopoietic activity. Disorders of excess haematopoiesis, such as pernicious anaemia and leukaemia, are typically accompanied by haematopoietic infiltration of the fatty marrow of the long bones. It has been unclear whether adipocytes participate in haematopoietic regulation or simply expand to fill marrow space. The answer appears to be that far from making up the numbers, fat cells play a critical physiological role in the bone marrow microenvironment. Experiments in mice show that adipocyte-rich marrow contains fewer blood-forming stem cells and progenitors than adipocyte-poor marrow. Genetically 'fat-free' mice and mice treated with a drug that blocks adipocyte production generated new blood cells more quickly than wild-type animals after a bone-marrow transplant, suggesting that blocking marrow adipogenesis may enhance haematopoietic recovery in clinical bone-marrow transplantation. Adult bone marrow contains numerous adipocytes, the numbers of which correlate inversely with the haematopoietic activity of the marrow. It had been unclear whether adipocytes participate in haematopoietic regulation or simply expand to fill marrow space; here it is shown that murine haematopoiesis is reduced in adipocyte-rich marrow during homeostasis, and that adipocytes antagonize haematopoietic recovery after bone-marrow irradiation. Osteoblasts and endothelium constitute functional niches that support haematopoietic stem cells in mammalian bone marrow1,2,3. Adult bone marrow also contains adipocytes, the number of which correlates inversely with the haematopoietic activity of the marrow. Fatty infiltration of haematopoietic red marrow follows irradiation or chemotherapy and is a diagnostic feature in biopsies from patients with marrow aplasia4. To explore whether adipocytes influence haematopoiesis or simply fill marrow space, we compared the haematopoietic activity of distinct regions of the mouse skeleton that differ in adiposity. Here we show, by flow cytometry, colony-forming activity and competitive repopulation assay, that haematopoietic stem cells and short-term progenitors are reduced in frequency in the adipocyte-rich vertebrae of the mouse tail relative to the adipocyte-free vertebrae of the thorax. In lipoatrophic A-ZIP/F1 ‘fatless’ mice, which are genetically incapable of forming adipocytes5, and in mice treated with the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ inhibitor bisphenol A diglycidyl ether, which inhibits adipogenesis6, marrow engraftment after irradiation is accelerated relative to wild-type or untreated mice. These data implicate adipocytes as predominantly negative regulators of the bone-marrow microenvironment, and indicate that antagonizing marrow adipogenesis may enhance haematopoietic recovery in clinical bone-marrow transplantation.
Mechanical stress is pervasive in egress routes of malignancy, yet the intrinsic effects of force on tumour cells remain poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that frictional force characteristic of flow in the lymphatics stimulates YAP1 to drive cancer cell migration; whereas intensities of fluid wall shear stress (WSS) typical of venous or arterial flow inhibit taxis. YAP1, but not TAZ, is strictly required for WSS-enhanced cell movement, as blockade of YAP1, TEAD1-4 or the YAP1–TEAD interaction reduces cellular velocity to levels observed without flow. Silencing of TEAD phenocopies loss of YAP1, implicating transcriptional transactivation function in mediating force-enhanced cell migration. WSS dictates expression of a network of YAP1 effectors with executive roles in invasion, chemotaxis and adhesion downstream of the ROCK–LIMK–cofilin signalling axis. Altogether, these data implicate YAP1 as a fluid mechanosensor that functions to regulate genes that promote metastasis.
The in vivo function of E2f transcription factors has been a matter of debate. Here it is shown that E2f1–3 contribute to the activation of cell cycle genes in dividing progenitor cells during mouse development but are dispensable for cell division. However, in differentiating cells, E2f1–3 act as repressors to facilitate cell cycle exit. The in vivo function of E2f transcription factors has been a matter of debate. The effects of E2f1, E2f2 and E2f3 triple deficiency are now examined in murine embryonic stem cells, embryos and small intestines. E2f1–3 are shown to function as transcriptional activators in normal dividing progenitor cells; however, contrary to the current view, they are dispensable for cell division but are necessary for cell survival. In the established model of mammalian cell cycle control, the retinoblastoma protein (Rb) functions to restrict cells from entering S phase by binding and sequestering E2f activators (E2f1, E2f2 and E2f3), which are invariably portrayed as the ultimate effectors of a transcriptional program that commit cells to enter and progress through S phase1,2. Using a panel of tissue-specific cre-transgenic mice and conditional E2f alleles we examined the effects of E2f1, E2f2 and E2f3 triple deficiency in murine embryonic stem cells, embryos and small intestines. We show that in normal dividing progenitor cells E2f1–3 function as transcriptional activators, but contrary to the current view, are dispensable for cell division and instead are necessary for cell survival. In differentiating cells E2f1–3 function in a complex with Rb as repressors to silence E2f targets and facilitate exit from the cell cycle. The inactivation of Rb in differentiating cells resulted in a switch of E2f1–3 from repressors to activators, leading to the superactivation of E2f responsive targets and ectopic cell divisions. Loss of E2f1–3 completely suppressed these phenotypes caused by Rb deficiency. This work contextualizes the activator versus repressor functions of E2f1–3 in vivo, revealing distinct roles in dividing versus differentiating cells and in normal versus cancer-like cell cycles.
7 December 2020 in Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
Mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) metabolism plays a crucial role in the surrounding microenvironment in both normal physiology and pathological conditions. While MSCs predominantly utilize glycolysis in their native hypoxic niche within the bone marrow, new evidence reveals the importance of upregulation in mitochondrial activity in MSC function and differentiation. Mitochondria and mitochondrial regulators such as sirtuins play key roles in MSC homeostasis and differentiation into mature lineages of the bone and hematopoietic niche, including osteoblasts and adipocytes. The metabolic state of MSCs represents a fine balance between the intrinsic needs of the cellular state and constraints imposed by extrinsic conditions. In the context of injury and inflammation, MSCs respond to reactive oxygen species (ROS) and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), such as damaged mitochondria and mitochondrial products, by donation of their mitochondria to injured cells. Through intercellular mitochondria trafficking, modulation of ROS, and modification of nutrient utilization, endogenous MSCs and MSC therapies are believed to exert protective effects by regulation of cellular metabolism in injured tissues. Similarly, these same mechanisms can be hijacked in malignancy whereby transfer of mitochondria and/or mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) to cancer cells increases mitochondrial content and enhances oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) to favor proliferation and invasion. The role of MSCs in tumor initiation, growth, and resistance to treatment is debated, but their ability to modify cancer cell metabolism and the metabolic environment suggests that MSCs are centrally poised to alter malignancy. In this review, we describe emerging evidence for adaptations in MSC bioenergetics that orchestrate developmental fate decisions and contribute to cancer progression. We discuss evidence and potential strategies for therapeutic targeting of MSC mitochondria in regenerative medicine and tissue repair. Lastly, we highlight recent progress in understanding the contribution of MSCs to metabolic reprogramming of malignancies and how these alterations can promote immunosuppression and chemoresistance. Better understanding the role of metabolic reprogramming by MSCs in tissue repair and cancer progression promises to broaden treatment options in regenerative medicine and clinical oncology.