Background: Knowledge regarding the long-term impact of invasive mechanical ventilation on the inspiratory muscles and functional outcomes in COVID-19 survivors is limited.Methods: In this single-centre prospective cohort study, we evaluated invasively ventilated patients with COVID-19 pneumonia 3 and 6 months post-intensive care unit (ICU) discharge. Outcomes included: maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), ultrasound parameters for diaphragm function, 6-min walk distance (6MWD), dyspnoea and quality of life. We evaluated associations between MIP and duration of mechanical ventilation with follow-up outcomes.Results: 50 COVID-19 survivors discharged from ICU between 15 October 2020 and 1 April 2021 were enrolled. Overall, survivors showed a recovery trajectory over time. However, impaired MIP remained in 24 (48%) and 12 (24%) at 3 and 6 months, respectively. Diaphragm dysfunction was not observed. At 3 months, 23 (46%) had impaired functional capacityversus10 (20%) at 6 months. Dyspnoea persisted in 44 (88%) patients at 3 months and 38 (76%) at 6 months. Quality of life was slightly decreased at 3 months with further improvements at 6 months. MIP was correlated to 6MWD, 6MWD % predicted, dyspnoea across follow-up, and quality of life at 3 months. The duration of invasive ventilation was correlated with 6MWD and 6MWD % predicted.Conclusion: In invasively ventilated COVID-19 survivors, inspiratory muscle strength impairments persisted 6 months after ICU discharge, while maintaining normal diaphragm function. Decreased functional capacity, dyspnoea and slightly reduced health status were observed. Early screening of survivors is of utmost importance to identify those with impairments and at risk of delayed or incomplete recovery.

Low back pain represents the leading cause of disability since 1990. In 90% of cases, it is classified as non-specific low back pain, being chronic in 10% of subjects. Ultrasound has proven to be an effective measurement tool to observe changes in the activity and morphology of the abdominal muscles. This article reviews which core synergies are studied with ultrasound in healthy subjects and with chronic non-specific low back pain. A systematic review was conducted on studies analyzing synergies between two or more core muscles. Publications from 2005 until July 2021 were identified by performing structured searched in Pubmed/MEDLINE, PEDro and WOS. Fifteen studies were eligible for the final systematic review. A total of 56% of the studies established synergies between the core muscles and 44% between the homo and contralateral sides of the core muscles. The most studied core synergies were transversus abdominis, internal oblique and external oblique followed by the rectus abdominis and the lumbar multifidus. No studies establishing synergies with diaphragm and pelvic floor were found. Eight studies were conducted in healthy subjects, five studies in subjects with chronic non-specific low back pain compared to healthy subjects and two studies in subjects with chronic non-specific low back pain.

Objetivos: conocer la prevalencia de dolor derivada del entrenamiento en karatekas de competición y su relación con los factores antropométricos y deportivos. Métodos: Estudio de prevalencia. Un total de 56 karatekas cumplimentaron un cuestionario al finalizar su entrenamiento de karate. Resultados: La prevalencia del dolor ha sido del 67.9%. Se ha demostrado que la rodilla es la zona más prevalente en relación con el dolor (31%) y con la sensación subjetiva de inestabilidad (50%). Se han encontrado relaciones estadísticamente significativas entre el dolor y la edad (p=0.04), el Índice de Masa Corporal (p=0.045), el grado de cinturón (p=0.017) y la frecuencia de entrenamiento de karate (p=0.011). Conclusiones: el dolor en karatekas de competición durante los entrenamientos muestra una alta prevalencia en la muestra estudiada. Hubo una correlación estadísticamente significativa en el dolor en los karatekas con un mayor índice de masa corporal, mayor edad, mayor grado de cinturón y mayor frecuencia de entrenamiento.

The aim of this study is to observe and compare the effects of regular yoga practice on the main inspiratory muscle, the diaphragm, by analyzing its thickness, excursion, velocity and contraction time, using ultrasound. A Cross-Sectional Controlled Study. 80 healthy subjects (40 habitual yoga practitioners and 40 non-practitioners), without previous respiratory pathology participated in this study. During maximum diaphragmatic breathing, the diaphragmatic thickness (at rest and after maximum inspiration), excursion, velocity and contraction time were measured by ultrasound. in the experimental group, practicing yoga, statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) were observed compared to the control group, not practicing, in the thickness of the diaphragm at rest (0.26 ± 0.02 vs 0.22 ± 0.01 cm); the diaphragmatic thickness in maximum inspiration (0.34 ± 0.03 vs 0.28 ± 0.03 cm); contraction velocity (1.54 ± 0.54 vs 2.23 ± 0.86 cm/s), contraction time (3.28 ± 0.45 vs 2.58 ± 0.49 s) and Borg scale of perceived exertion (1.05 ± 1.6 vs 1.70 ± 1.34), p = 0.05. However, the diaphragmatic excursion was greater in the control group (5.45 ± 1.42 vs 4.87 ± 1.33 cm) with no statistically significant differences (p = 0.06). the regular practice of yoga improves the parameters of diaphragm thickness, speed and contraction time measured in ultrasound and the sensation of perceived exertion during a maximum inspiration. So it can be considered as another method for training the inspiratory muscles in clinical practice.

Lower back pain (LBP) has been the leading cause of disability since 1990. Objectives: The main objective of this observational case–control study was to evaluate, using ultrasound, whether there were differences in the onset and ratio of core muscle contraction between subjects with non-specific chronic lower back pain and healthy subjects. Methods: A total of 60 participants (52% women), split between those with non-specific chronic lower back pain (n = 26) and healthy (n = 34) subjects, were recruited. Initial muscle contraction of the lateral abdominal wall, pelvic floor, lumbar multifidus, and respiratory diaphragm was measured using ultrasound. The abdominal drawing-in maneuver, contralateral arm elevation, the Valsalva maneuver, and voluntary contraction of the pelvic floor in seated and standing positions were performed. The muscle thickness of the lateral abdominal wall and lumbar multifidus and excursion of the pelvic floor and diaphragm at rest and during testing were also analyzed. Results: No differences were found between the groups in the initial contraction. Statistically significant differences were found in the following variables: diaphragm excursion (p = 0.032, r = 0.277) and lumbar multifidus ratio (p = 0.010, r = 0.333) in the standing–abdominal retraction maneuver; pelvic floor excursion (p = 0.012, r = 0.325) in the standing–contralateral arm raise; and transverse abdominis ratio (p = 0.033, r = 0.275) in the sitting–contralateral arm raise. A statistically significant interaction between the groups and body mass index was observed in resting diaphragm excursion (p = 0.018, partial eta squared = 0.096) during sitting–voluntary pelvic floor contraction. Conclusions: It cannot be concluded that there is a specific pattern of core activation in any of the groups. However, statistically significant differences were found in the contraction indexes of the lumbopelvic musculature.