Evangelia Drakou

Dr. Evangelia Drakou

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2012 in Ecosystem Services
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JMJoachim Maes
Joachim Maes
BEBenis Egoh
Benis Egoh
LWLouise Willemen
Louise Willemen
CLCamino Liquete
Camino Liquete
PVPetteri Vihervaara
Petteri Vihervaara
GBGiovanni Bidoglio
Giovanni Bidoglio
Mainstreaming ecosystem services into policy and decision making is dependent on the availability of spatially explicit information on the state and trends of ecosystems and their services. In particular, the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 addresses the need to account for ecosystem services through biophysical mapping and valuation. This paper reviews current mapping methods, identifies current knowledge gaps and provides the elements for a methodological framework for mapping and assessing at European scale. Current mapping methodologies go beyond purely land cover based assessments and include the use of the primary data of ecosystem services, the use functional traits to map ecosystem services and the development of models and ecological production functions. Additional research is needed to cover marine ecosystems and to include the resilience of ecosystems to environmental change in spatially explicit assessments. The ecosystem services cascade which connects ecosystems to human wellbeing is argued to provide a suitable methodological framework for mapping ecosystem services in order to support EU policies in a more effective way. We demonstrate the use of this framework for mapping using the water purification service as case.JRC.H.1-Water Resource

1 June 2013 in Ecosystem Services
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NCNeville Crossman
Neville Crossman
BBBenjamin Burkhard
Benjamin Burkhard
SNStoyan Nedkov
Stoyan Nedkov
LWLouise Willemen
Louise Willemen
KPKatalin Petz
Katalin Petz
JMJoachim Maes
Joachim Maes

3 July 2013 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CLCamino Liquete
Camino Liquete
CPChiara Piroddi
Chiara Piroddi
EDEvangelia Drakou
Evangelia Drakou
LGLeigh Gurney
Leigh Gurney
Stelios KatsanevakisStelios Katsanevakis
Stelios Katsanevakis
BEBenis Egoh
Benis Egoh
Research on ecosystem services has grown exponentially during the last decade. Most of the studies have focused on assessing and mapping terrestrial ecosystem services highlighting a knowledge gap on marine and coastal ecosystem services (MCES) and an urgent need to assess them. We reviewed and summarized existing scientific literature related to MCES with the aim of extracting and classifying indicators used to assess and map them. We found 145 papers that specifically assessed marine and coastal ecosystem services from which we extracted 476 indicators. Food provision, in particular fisheries, was the most extensively analyzed MCES while water purification and coastal protection were the most frequently studied regulating and maintenance services. Also recreation and tourism under the cultural services was relatively well assessed. We highlight knowledge gaps regarding the availability of indicators that measure the capacity, flow or benefit derived from each ecosystem service. The majority of the case studies was found in mangroves and coastal wetlands and was mainly concentrated in Europe and North America. Our systematic review highlighted the need of an improved ecosystem service classification for marine and coastal systems, which is herein proposed with definitions and links to previous classifications. This review summarizes the state of available information related to ecosystem services associated with marine and coastal ecosystems. The cataloging of MCES indicators and the integrated classification of MCES provided in this paper establish a background that can facilitate the planning and integration of future assessments. The final goal is to establish a consistent structure and populate it with information able to support the implementation of biodiversity conservation policies.

1 February 2016 in Ecosystem Services
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JMJoachim Maes
Joachim Maes
CLCamino Liquete
Camino Liquete
ATAnne Teller
Anne Teller
MEMarkus Erhard
Markus Erhard
MPMaria Luisa Paracchini
Maria Luisa Paracchini
CLCarlo Lavalle
Carlo Lavalle
Maes, Joachim... et. al.-- 10 pages, 2 figures, 3 tables, supplementary material https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.023In the EU, the mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services, abbreviated to MAES, is seen as a key action for the advancement of biodiversity objectives, and also to inform the development and implementation of related policies on water, climate, agriculture, forest, marine and regional planning. In this study, we present the development of an analytical framework which ensures that consistent approaches are used throughout the EU. It is framed by a broad set of key policy questions and structured around a conceptual framework that links human societies and their well-being with the environment. Next, this framework is tested through four thematic pilot studies, including stakeholders and experts working at different scales and governance levels, which contributed indicators to assess the state of ecosystem services. Indicators were scored according to different criteria and assorted per ecosystem type and ecosystem services using the common international classification of ecosystem services (CICES) as typology. We concluded that there is potential to develop a first EU wide ecosystem assessment on the basis of existing data if they are combined in a creative way. However, substantial data gaps remain to be filled before a fully integrated and complete ecosystem assessment can be carried outBalint Czúcz was supported by the Bolyai Grant of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences under grant number BO/00138/12/8Peer Reviewe

12 June 2015 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LWLouise Willemen
Louise Willemen
ACAndrew J Cottam
Andrew J Cottam
EDEvangelia Drakou
Evangelia Drakou
NBNeil D Burgess
Neil D Burgess
Cultural ecosystem services are defined by people’s perception of the environment, which make them hard to quantify systematically. Methods to describe cultural benefits from ecosystems typically include resource-demanding survey techniques, which are not suitable to assess cultural ecosystem services for large areas. In this paper we explore a method to quantify cultural benefits through the enjoyment of natured-based tourism, by assessing the potential tourism attractiveness of species for each protected area in Africa using the IUCN’s Red List of Threatened Species. We use the number of pictures of wildlife posted on a photo sharing website as a proxy for charisma, popularity, and ease of observation, as these factors combined are assumed to determine how attractive species are for the global wildlife tourist. Based on photo counts of 2473 African animals and plants, species that seem most attractive to nature-based tourism are the Lion, African Elephant and Leopard. Combining the photo counts with species range data, African protected areas with the highest potential to attract wildlife tourists based on attractive species occurrence were Samburu National Reserve in Kenya, Mukogodo Forest Reserve located just north of Mount Kenya, and Addo Elephant National Park in South-Africa. The proposed method requires only three data sources which are freely accessible and available online, which could make the proposed index tractable for large scale quantitative ecosystem service assessments. The index directly links species presence to the tourism potential of protected areas, making the connection between nature and human benefits explicit, but excludes other important contributing factors for tourism, such as accessibility and safety. This social media based index provides a broad understanding of those species that are popular globally; in many cases these are not the species of highest conservation concern.

11 February 2022 in Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Patricia BalvaneraPatricia Balvanera
Patricia Balvanera
KBKate A Brauman
Kate A Brauman
ACAnna Cord
Anna Cord
EDEvangelia Drakou
Evangelia Drakou
IGIlse R Geijzendorffer
Ilse R Geijzendorffer
MSMatthias Schröter
Matthias Schröter