Sara Debulpaep

Dr. Sara Debulpaep

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 September 2019 in Archives of Virology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VVVanessa Verbeke
Vanessa Verbeke
MRMarijke Reynders
Marijke Reynders
KFKatelijne Floré
Katelijne Floré
WVWouter Vandewal
Wouter Vandewal
SDSara Debulpaep
Sara Debulpaep
EPElizaveta Padalko
Elizaveta Padalko

18 July 2019 in Frontiers in Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SDSara Debulpaep
Sara Debulpaep
VCVéronique Corbière
Véronique Corbière
JLJack Levy
Jack Levy
PSPetra Schelstraete
Petra Schelstraete
KDKoen Vanden Driessche
Koen Vanden Driessche
FMFrançoise Mouchet
Françoise Mouchet
Introduction: Interferon Gamma Release Assay (IGRA) has proven to be a useful test to evaluate the immune response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigens in children over the age of 5 years as an alternative to tuberculin skin testing (TST). Much less is known about its performance in younger children, who are at higher risk for developing tuberculosis (TB) disease after exposure. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of using IGRA in TB screening in this population. Methods: Children below the age of 5 years at high risk for TB infection were prospectively enrolled, to compare the performance of TST and the QuantiFERON-TB Gold-In-Tube test (QFT). Children were treated in accordance with the diagnosis made at baseline and followed-up for 12 months. Results: We included a total of 60 children of which 97 blood samples were available for analysis. There was 90.72% agreement between TST and QFT (Kappa test 0.59, moderate agreement). With TST as a reference, the QFT positive predictive value was 0.72 and the negative predictive value 0.93. Discordant results were observed with 6% TST+/QFT– paired tests. When we restricted the comparison of TST and QFT to non-BCG-vaccinated children, the degree of agreement was more substantial (95%, Kappa test 0.75) and the negative predictive value was 0.99. We observed 3% discordant TST–/QFT+ results. All children with active TB disease had concordant positive QFT results, with QFT values above 4.00 IU/ml. Conclusion: In a low TB prevalence country, serial testing of QFT was found to produce a moderate agreement with TST results. False positive QFT results would have been eliminated by using a higher cutoff without misdiagnosing the children with TB disease. Some of the false negative QFT results could be explained by false positive TST results on consecutive testing. For now the most prudent approach would be to consider discordant QFT–/TST+ results as false negative QFT results, taking into account the young age of our population and the potential risk for evolution to active TB disease.

17 November 2022 in Children
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Emma RheelEmma Rheel
Emma Rheel
TVTine Vervoort
Tine Vervoort
AMAnneleen Malfliet
Anneleen Malfliet
JBJutte van der Werff Ten Bosch
Jutte van der Werff Ten Bosch
SDSara Debulpaep
Sara Debulpaep
KIKelly Ickmans
Kelly Ickmans
The current study evaluated the feasibility and preliminary clinical impact of robot-led distraction during needle procedures in children with chronic diseases on pain-related memories. Participants were 22 children (8–12 years old) diagnosed with a chronic disease (e.g., chronic immune deficiency) and undergoing a needle procedure as part of their routine treatment. Children were randomized to the experimental group (i.e., robot-led distraction) or control group (i.e., usual care). For feasibility, we evaluated study- and needle-procedure-related characteristics, intervention fidelity and acceptability, and nurse perceptions of the intervention. Primary clinical outcomes included children’s memory bias for pain intensity and pain-related fear (1 week later). Results indicated that intervention components were >90% successful. Overall, the robot-led distraction intervention was perceived highly acceptable by the children, while nurse perceptions were mixed, indicating several challenges regarding the intervention. Preliminary between-group analyses indicated a medium effect size on memory bias for pain intensity (Hedges’ g = 0.70), but only a very small effect size on memory bias for pain-related fear (Hedges’ g = 0.09), in favor of the robot-led distraction intervention. To summarize, while feasible, certain challenges remain to clinically implement robot-led distraction during needle procedures. Further development of the intervention while accounting for individual child preferences is recommended.

7 February 2020 in Frontiers in Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SDSara Debulpaep
Sara Debulpaep
ADAlexandra Dreesman
Alexandra Dreesman
VDViolette Dirix
Violette Dirix
VTVeronique Toppet
Veronique Toppet
MWMaryse Wanlin
Maryse Wanlin
FMFrançoise Mouchet
Françoise Mouchet
Introduction: Belgium is a country with low incidence of tuberculosis (TB) and a very low number of TB cases in children. Children in contact with an adult smear-positive TB case are at high risk of transmission. Early diagnosis is important as young children have a significant predisposition of developing TB disease. In this paper, we describe two outbreaks after exposure to, respectively, two teachers with smear-positive pulmonary TB: one in a primary school, a nursery teacher, and another in a private language school. Methods: An exposure investigation was carried out in both index cases household and school, according to the stone-in-the-pond principle. The tuberculin skin test (TST) was used a screening tool. The time elapsed between TB diagnosis in the index case and contact investigation was, respectively, 1 and 3 weeks. If this initial test was negative, it was repeated after a “window period” of ≥8 weeks. Results: Index cases showed a transmission rate of, respectively, 13 and 40% in their classes at school, defined as casual contacts. The proximity of contact increased the risk of infection. TB disease was observed in, respectively, 4 and 11% of all the casual contacts; all of them were children younger than 5 years old. TB-infected and children with active TB disease had good compliance with recommended treatment. Uptake of chemoprophylaxis during the “window period” was poor, respectively, only 32–42%, in children under 5 years with an initially negative TST. Discussion: The World Health Organization recommends to screen all young children (<5 years old) who have close contact with a person affected by pulmonary TB and to initiate Latent tuberculosis infection treatment even before infection can be demonstrated, after ruling out active TB disease. Despite this knowledge, a small percentage of the children younger than 5 years with no proof of infection was treated with the proposed chemoprophylactic treatment, in both cases. Conclusion: This exposure investigation of two teachers detects high transmission among family contacts and school casual contacts. Recommendations for chemoprophylactic treatment in children <5 years showed low compliance, reflecting the difficulty of communication to staff, parents, and children in a school outbreak. It is essential to develop a new approach for this vulnerable group of patients. This approach could be improved, applied, and evaluated by National TB Control Programs, involving public and private health services. Public health authorities play a role in raising public awareness about the risks of TB for young children.

25 July 2019 in Frontiers in Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ADAlexandra Dreesman
Alexandra Dreesman
VDViolette Dirix
Violette Dirix
KSKaat Smits
Kaat Smits
VCVéronique Corbière
Véronique Corbière
APAnne Van Praet
Anne Van Praet
FMFrançoise Mascart
Françoise Mascart
Background: Improved diagnostic tests are needed for the early identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected young children exposed to an active TB (aTB) index case. We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of new blood-based tests to that of the tuberculin skin test (TST) for the identification of all infected children and for a potential differentiation between aTB and latent TB infection (LTBI). Methods: 144 children exposed to a patient with aTB were included, and those who met all inclusion criteria (130/144) were classified in three groups based on results from classical investigations: non-infected (NI: n = 69, 53%, median age 10 months), LTBI (n = 28, 22%, median age 96 months), aTB disease (n = 33, 25%, median age 24 months). The first whole blood assay consisted of a 7-days in vitro stimulation of blood with four different mycobacterial antigens (40 μl/condition), followed by flow cytometric measurement of the proportions of blast cells appearing among lymphocytes as a result of their specific activation. Thresholds of positivity were determined by Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (results of NI children vs. children with LTBI/aTB) in order to identify infected children in a first stage. Other cut-offs were determined to discriminate subgroups of infected children in a second step (results from children with aTB/LTBI). Analysis of blood monocytes and dendritic cell subsets was performed on 100 μl of blood for 25 of these children as a second test in a pilot study. Results: Combining the results of the blast-induced CD3+ T lymphocytes by Heparin-Binding Haemagglutinin and by Culture Filtrate Protein-10 identified all but one infected children (sensitivity 98.2% and specificity 86.9%, compared to 93.4 and 100% for the TST). Further identification among infected children of those with aTB was best achieved by the results of blast-induced CD8+ T lymphocytes by purified protein derivative (sensitivity for localized aTB: 61.9%, specificity 96.3%), whereas high proportions of blood type 2 myeloid dendritic cells (mDC) were a hallmark of LTBI. Conclusions: New blood-based tests requiring a very small volume allow the accurate identification of M. tuberculosis-infected young children among exposed children and are promising to guide the clinical classification of children with aTB or LTBI.

16 June 2023 in European Journal of Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VPVeerle Piette
Veerle Piette
LDLuc Deliens
Luc Deliens
SDSara Debulpaep
Sara Debulpaep
JCJoachim Cohen
Joachim Cohen
KBKim Beernaert
Kim Beernaert