The adoption of agricultural robots is revolutionizing the agricultural sector, offering innovative solutions to optimize production and reduce environmental impact. This review examines the main functions and applications of agricultural robots, with a focus on the crops handled and the technologies employed. The study analyzes the current state of the art regarding the market trend of agricultural robots used in field and greenhouse operations. Several solutions are emerging, some already implemented and others still in the prototype or project stage. These solutions are beginning to spread, though they may still seem far from widespread field application, particularly given the peculiarities and heterogeneity of the global agricultural landscape. In the face of the many benefits associated with the use of agricultural robots, even today some technical bottlenecks and costs limit their widespread use by farmers. The review provides a fairly comprehensive and up-to-date overview of current trends in agricultural automation, suggesting new areas of research to improve the efficiency and adaptability of robotic systems to different types of crops and environments.

Due to its advantages, remote sensing monitoring has been used in various applications and made noteworthy contributions to understanding soil and plant processes, as well as in the agriculture sector. The aim of the work is to compare the return of durum wheat crops in conservative agricultural practices in Mediterranean climate conditions by analysing the data from the Sentinel2 satellite through three spectral indices. The analysed spectral indices have different interpretations and therefore have been studied in different periods: (i) NDVI (normalized difference vegetation index) for the evaluation of the vegetative vigour from January to June; (ii) NDWI (normalized difference water index) for the moisture of covered soil from January to June and of bare soil after harvesting from June to August; and (iii) NMDI (normalized multi-band drought index) for the variability of bare soil moisture from June to August. With reference to the machines used in cultivation practices, a further purpose of the study is to investigate the effects of automatic guidance versus manual guidance on production yields and on the spectral indices considered. The first results show that the NDVI follows crop phenological stages by reaching the maximum values in correspondence with the stem elongation and booting stages. Additionally, the NDWI showed the same trend as the NDVI during the current crop. After harvesting, the NDWI showed higher values in the plots cultivated under conservation tillage practices. In the same period, the NMDI showed the same results as the NDWI and a positive correlation, confirming that tillage practices could imply a lower ability to retain water in drought time.

Precision agriculture has recently experienced significant advancements through the use of technologies such as unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and satellite imagery, enabling more efficient and precise agricultural management. Yield estimation from these technologies is essential for optimizing resource allocation, improving harvest logistics, and supporting decision-making for sustainable vineyard management. This study aimed to evaluate grape cluster numbers estimated by using YOLOv7x in combination with images obtained by UAVs from a vineyard. Additionally, the capability of several vegetation indices calculated from Sentinel-2 and PlanetScope satellites to estimate grape clusters was evaluated. The results showed that the application of the YOLOv7x model to RGB images acquired from UAVs was able to accurately predict grape cluster numbers (R² value and RMSE value of 0.64 and 0.78 clusters vine⁻¹). On the contrary, vegetation indexes derived from Sentinel-2 and PlanetScope satellites were found not able to predict grape cluster numbers (R² lower than 0.23), probably due to the fact that these indexes are more related to vegetation vigor, which is not always related to yield parameters (e.g., cluster number). This study suggests that the combination of high-resolution UAV images, multispectral satellite images, and advanced detection models like YOLOv7x can significantly improve the accuracy of vineyard management, resulting in more efficient and sustainable agriculture.

In recent years, agriculture has begun to transform thanks to the arrival of robots and autonomous vehicles capable of performing complex operations such as weeding and spraying in an intelligent and targeted manner. In fact, new-generation agricultural robots use artificial intelligence (AI), cameras, and sensors to recognise weeds, analyse crop conditions, and apply plant protection products only where necessary, thus reducing waste and environmental impact. Some systems combine drones and ground vehicles to achieve even more accurate results. This systematic review synthesises recent advances in agricultural robotics for weed and pest management through a PRISMA-based approach. Literature was collected from major scientific databases (Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, Google Scholar) and complementary sources, leading to the inclusion of 83 eligible studies. The selected evidence was structured into four application domains: (i) weed detection and mapping, (ii) robotic and non-chemical weed control (mechanical and laser-based approaches), (iii) selective/variable-rate spraying for pest and disease management, and (iv) integrated weeding–spraying solutions, including cooperative Unmanned Aerial Vehicle–Unmanned Ground Vehicle (UAV–UGV) systems. Overall, the reviewed studies confirm rapid progress in real-time perception (deep learning-based detection), navigation/localization (e.g., GNSS/RTK, LiDAR, sensor fusion) and targeted actuation (spot spraying and precision interventions), while also revealing persistent limitations: heterogeneous evaluation protocols, limited system-level comparisons in terms of work rate, scalability, costs and robustness under variable field conditions, and an often unclear distinction between prototype platforms and solutions close to commercialization. However, the large-scale spread of these technologies is still hampered by high costs, technical complexity, and cultural resistance. The review highlights how the integration of automation, sustainability, and accessibility is key to the agriculture of the future.