Paolo Bartolomeo

Dr. Paolo Bartolomeo

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

36Years (1991-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 September 2005 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MSMichel Thiebaut de Schotten
Michel Thiebaut de Schotten
MUMarika Urbanski
Marika Urbanski
HDHugues Duffau
Hugues Duffau
EVEmmanuelle Volle
Emmanuelle Volle
RLRichard LévY
Richard LévY
PBPaolo Bartolomeo
Paolo Bartolomeo
Intraoperative electrical stimulation, which temporarily inactivates restricted regions during brain surgery, can map cognitive functions in humans with spatiotemporal resolution unmatched by other methods. Using this technique, we found that stimulation of the right inferior parietal lobule or the caudal superior temporal gyrus, but not of its rostral portion, determined rightward deviations on line bisection. However, the strongest shifts occurred with subcortical stimulation. Fiber tracking identified the stimulated site as a section of the superior occipitofrontal fasciculus, a poorly known parietal-frontal pathway. These findings suggest that parietal-frontal communication is necessary for the symmetrical processing of the visual scene.

1 January 2012 in Frontiers in Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ACAna B. Chica
Ana B. Chica
PBPaolo Bartolomeo
Paolo Bartolomeo
The relationships between spatial attention and conscious perception are currently the object of intense debate. Recent evidence of double dissociations between attention and consciousness cast doubt on the time-honored concept of attention as a gateway to consciousness. Here we review evidence from behavioral, neurophysiologic, neuropsychological, and neuroimaging experiments, showing that distinct sorts of spatial attention can have different effects on visual conscious perception. While endogenous, or top-down attention, has weak influence on subsequent conscious perception of near-threshold stimuli, exogenous, or bottom-up forms of spatial attention appear instead to be a necessary, although not sufficient, step in the development of reportable visual experiences. Fronto-parietal networks important for spatial attention, with peculiar inter-hemispheric differences, constitute plausible neural substrates for the interactions between exogenous spatial attention and conscious perception.

1 December 2000 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAnne-Catherine Bachoud-Lévi
Anne-Catherine Bachoud-Lévi
PRPhilippe Rémy
Philippe Rémy
JNJean-Paul Nǵuyen
Jean-Paul Nǵuyen
PBPierre Brugières
Pierre Brugières
JLJean-Pascal Lefaucheur
Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
MPMarc Peschanski
Marc Peschanski

31 January 2007 in Cerebral Cortex
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PBPaolo Bartolomeo
Paolo Bartolomeo
MSMichel Thiebaut de Schotten
Michel Thiebaut de Schotten
FDFabrizio Doricchi
Fabrizio Doricchi
Unilateral spatial neglect is a disabling neurological condition that typically results from right hemisphere damage. Neglect patients are unable to take into account information coming from the left side of space. The study of neglect is important for understanding the brain mechanisms of spatial cognition, but its anatomical correlates are currently the object of intense debate. We propose a reappraisal of the contribution of disconnection factors to the pathophysiology of neglect based on a review of animal and patient studies. These indicate that damage to the long-range white matter pathways connecting parietal and frontal areas within the right hemisphere may constitute a crucial antecedent of neglect. Thus, neglect would not result from the dysfunction of a single cortical region but from the disruption of large networks made up of distant cortical regions. In this perspective, we also reexamined the possible contribution to neglect of interhemispheric disconnection. The reviewed evidence, often present in previous studies but frequently overlooked, is consistent with the existence of distributed cortical networks for orienting of attention in the normal brain, has implications for theories of neglect and normal spatial processing, opens perspectives for research on brain–behavior relationships, and suggests new possibilities for patient diagnosis and rehabilitation.

15 November 2012 in Cerebral Cortex
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMichel Thiebaut de Schotten
Michel Thiebaut de Schotten
Francesco TomaiuoloFrancesco Tomaiuolo
Francesco Tomaiuolo
MAMarilena Aiello
Marilena Aiello
SMSheila Merola
Sheila Merola
MSMassimo Silvetti
Massimo Silvetti
FDFabrizio Doricchi
Fabrizio Doricchi
The exact anatomical localization of right hemisphere lesions that lead to left spatial neglect is still debated. The effect of confounding factors such as acute diaschisis and hypoperfusion, visual field defects, and lesion size may account for conflicting results that have been reported in the literature. Here, we present a comprehensive anatomical investigation of the gray- and white matter lesion correlates of left spatial neglect, which was run in a sample 58 patients with subacute or chronic vascular strokes in the territory of the right middle cerebral artery. Standard voxel-based correlates confirmed the role played by lesions in the posterior parietal cortex (supramarginal gyrus, angular gyrus, and temporal–parietal junction), in the frontal cortex (frontal eye field, middle and inferior frontal gyrus), and in the underlying parietal–frontal white matter. Using a new diffusion tensor imaging-based atlas of the human brain, we were able to run, for the first time, a detailed analysis of the lesion involvement of subcortical white matter pathways. The results of this analysis revealed that, among the different pathways linking parietal with frontal areas, damage to the second branch of the superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF II) was the best predictor of left spatial neglect. The group study also revealed a subsample of patients with neglect due to focal lesion in the lateral–dorsal portion of the thalamus, which connects the premotor cortex with the inferior parietal lobule. The relevance of fronto-parietal disconnection was further supported by complete in vivo tractography dissection of white matter pathways in 2 patients, one with and the other without signs of neglect. These 2 patients were studied both in the acute phase and 1 year after stroke and were perfectly matched for age, handedness, stroke onset, lesion size, and for cortical lesion involvement. Taken together, the results of the present study support the hypothesis that anatomical disconnections leading to a functional breakdown of parietal–frontal networks are an important pathophysiological factor leading to chronic left spatial neglect. Here, we propose that different loci of SLF disconnection on the rostro-caudal axis can also be associated with disconnection of short-range white matter pathways within the frontal or parietal areas. Such different local disconnection patterns can play a role in the important clinical variability of the neglect syndrome.

1 January 2013 in Behavioural Brain Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ACAna B. Chica
Ana B. Chica
PBPaolo Bartolomeo
Paolo Bartolomeo
JLJuan Lupianez
Juan Lupianez