Stress granules (SGs), membrane-less cellular organelles formed via liquid-liquid phase separation, are central to how cells adapt to various stress conditions, including endoplasmic reticulum stress, nutrient scarcity, and hypoxia. Recent studies have underscored a significant link between SGs and the process of tumorigenesis, highlighting that proteins, associated components, and signaling pathways that facilitate SG formation are often upregulated in cancer. SGs play a key role in enhancing tumor cell proliferation, invasion, and migration, while also inhibiting apoptosis, facilitating immune evasion, and driving metabolic reprogramming through multiple mechanisms. Furthermore, SGs have been identified as crucial elements in the development of resistance against chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and radiotherapy across a variety of cancer types. This review delves into the complex role of SGs in cancer development and resistance, bringing together the latest progress in the field and exploring new avenues for therapeutic intervention.

Breast cancer has a special tumor microenvironment compared to other solid tumors, which is usually surrounded by a large number of adipocytes that can produce and secrete fatty acids and adipokines. Adipocytes have a remodeling effect on breast cancer lipid metabolism, while fatty acids and lipid droplets can make breast cancer cells more aggressive. Lipid metabolism, especially the synthesis of fatty acids, is an important cellular process for membrane biosynthesis, energy storage, and signal molecule production. Therefore, blocking the lipid supply to cancer cells or changing the lipid composition has an important impact on the signal transmission and cell proliferation of cancer cells. Alterations in lipid availability can also affect cancer cell migration, induction of angiogenesis, metabolic symbiosis, evasion of immune surveillance, and cancer drug resistance. Fatty acid synthesis and metabolism have received extensive attention as potential targets for cancer therapy, and studies on modulating the tumor lipid microenvironment to improve the sensitivity of antitumor drugs have also been discussed; however, strategies to target these processes have not been translated into clinical practice.

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common lung cancer and a major cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Deguelin plays a vital inhibitory role in NSCLC initiation and development. However, the downstream mechanism of deguelin-suppressed metastasis of NSCLC cells is still not completely understood. Interestingly, phosphatase and tensin homologue deleted on chromosome 10 (PTEN) and Krüppel-like factor 4 (KLF4) also contribute to inhibition of metastasis in NSCLC cells. Here, we demonstrated that deguelin significantly upregulated PTEN and KLF4 expressions and PTEN positively upregulated KLF4 expression in NSCLC cells including A549 and PC9 cells. Moreover, overexpressions of PTEN and KLF4 inhibited the migration and invasion of NSCLC cells, an effect similar to that of deguelin. Furthermore, overexpressions of PTEN and KLF4 could suppress the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), an effect also similar to that of deguelin. Additionally, deguelin displayed a significant antitumor ability by upregulating PTEN and KLF4 expressions in mice model with NSCLC cells. Together, these results indicated that deguelin could be a potential therapeutic agent through upregulating PTEN and KLF4 expressions for NSCLC therapy.

Aims: Prostate cancer is one of the most common malignancies in men. Biochemical recurrence (BCR) and progression following curative treatment pose a significant public health challenge. Thus, it is essential to explore effective biomarkers for disease progression monitoring and risk stratification. The promoter region of the paired-like homeodomain transcription factor 2 (PITX2) gene has been found to be frequently methylated in prostate cancer. However, the prognostic role of PITX2 methylation in prostate cancer and which patients most likely to be recommended for PITX2 methylation tests to assess BCR risk remain controversial. Therefore, a systematic review was performed to explore the relationship of PITX2 methylation with the BCR risk of prostate cancer. Methods: The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for eligible studies. Seven studies with a total of 2185 patients were included. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Results: The overall HR was 2.71 (95% CI, 2.21–3.31), suggesting that PITX2 methylation has an adverse impact on BCR of prostate cancer. The pooled estimate of 5-year BCR-free survival for patients with a high methylation status was significantly lower than that for patients with a low methylation status (71% vs 90%; odds ratio [OR] = 3.50; 95% CI, 2.67–4.60, P = .000). A subgroup analysis was conducted according to detection method; the combined HRs were 2.68 (95% CI, 2.02–3.55) for quantitative methylation-specific PCR (qMSP) and 3.29 (95% CI, 2.31–4.68) for microarray EpiChip. In subgroups defined by region, Gleason score, pathological stage, surgical margin status and ethnicity, high methylation status was also associated with BCR of prostate cancer. Conclusions: As an effective biomarker, PITX2 methylation is feasible for individualized BCR risk assessment of prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy.