Kibum Kim

Dr. Kibum Kim

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2018 in Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KKKibum Kim
Kibum Kim
JMJonathan W. Magness
Jonathan W. Magness
RNRyan Nelson
Ryan Nelson
VBValerie Baron
Valerie Baron
DBDiana I. Brixner
Diana I. Brixner
BACKGROUND: In polypharmacy patients, medication therapy management (MTM) services provide a comprehensive review of current medications and future treatment goals. Pharmacogenetics (PGx) may furth...

18 July 2024 in Kidney Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KKKibum Kim
Kibum Kim
JCJacob Crook
Jacob Crook
CLChao-Chin Lu
Chao-Chin Lu
HNHeather Nyman
Heather Nyman
JSJyotirmoy Sarker
Jyotirmoy Sarker
JLJoanne LaFleur
Joanne LaFleur
Background: In the United States, diabetic kidney disease (DKD) affects about one-third of individuals with type 2 diabetes, causing significant fi cant economic burdens on the health care system and affecting patients' quality of life. Objective: The aim of the study was to quantify the burden of care in patients at different stages of DKD and to monitor shifts in healthcare costs throughout these stages. Methods: This study used data from the Veterans Affairs National database, focusing on US veterans diagnosed with DKD between January 2016 and March 2022. Aggregated all-cause health care costs per month were summarized using descriptive statistics. We used a generalized linear model to calculate the cost of DKD patent care based on the stages, dialysis phase, and kidney replacement therapy. Results: The cohort of 685,288 patients with DKD was predominantly male (96.51%), White (74.42%), and non-Hispanic (93.54%). The mean (SD) per patient per-month costs were $1,597 ($3,178), $1,772 ($4,269), $2,857 ($13,072), $3,722 ($12,134), $5,505 ($14,639), and $6,999 ($16,901) for stages 1, 2, 3a, 3b, 4 and respectively. The average monthly expenditure for patients receiving long-term dialysis was $12,299. Costs peaked sharply during the fi rst month of kidney replacement therapy at $38,359 but subsequently decreased to $6,636 after 1 year. Conclusions: The economic implications of DKD are profound, emphasizing the need for efficient i cient early detection and disease management strategies. Preventing patients from progressing to advanced DKD stage will minimize the economic repercussions of DKD and will assist health care systems in optimizing resource allocation.

18 May 2022 in Clinical Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GNGrzegorz S. Nowakowski
Grzegorz S. Nowakowski
DYDok Hyun Yoon
Dok Hyun Yoon
APAnthea C. Peters
Anthea C. Peters
PMPatrizia Mondello
Patrizia Mondello
EJErel Joffe
Erel Joffe
GSGilles Salles
Gilles Salles
Purpose: In RE-MIND2 (NCT04697160), patient-level outcomes from the L-MIND study (NCT02399085) of tafasitamab plus lenalidomide were retrospectively compared with patient-level matched observational cohorts treated with National Cancer Care Network (NCCN)/European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO)-listed systemic therapies for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Patients and Methods: Data were collected from health records of eligible patients aged ≥18 years with histologically confirmed DLBCL who had received ≥2 systemic therapies for DLBCL (including ≥1 anti-CD20 therapy). Patients from L-MIND were matched with patients from the RE-MIND2 observational cohort using estimated propensity score-based 1:1 nearest-neighbor matching, balanced for nine covariates. The primary analysis compared tafasitamab plus lenalidomide with patients who received any systemic therapy for R/R DLBCL (pooled in one cohort) or bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) or rituximab plus gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (R-GemOx; as two distinct cohorts). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included treatment response and time-to-event outcomes. Results: In RE-MIND2, 3,454 patients were enrolled from 200 sites in North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific. Strictly matched pairs of patients consisted of tafasitamab plus lenalidomide versus systemic therapies pooled (n = 76 pairs), versus BR (n = 75 pairs), and versus R­GemOx (n = 74 pairs). Significantly prolonged OS was reported with tafasitamab plus lenalidomide versus systemic pooled therapies [hazard ratios (HR): 0.55; P = 0.0068], BR (HR: 0.42; P < 0.0001), and R-GemOx (HR: 0.47; P = 0.0003). Conclusions: RE-MIND2, a retrospective observational study, met its primary endpoint, demonstrating prolonged OS with tafasitamab plus lenalidomide versus BR and R-GemOx. See related commentary by Cherng and Westin, p. 3908

1 January 2017 in Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KKKibum Kim
Kibum Kim
TLTodd A. Lee
Todd A. Lee
DTDaniel R. Touchette
Daniel R. Touchette
RDRobert J. DiDomenico
Robert J. DiDomenico
AAAmer K. Ardati
Amer K. Ardati
SWSurrey M. Walton
Surrey M. Walton
BACKGROUND: Recent trials demonstrated the efficacy of prasugrel and ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in the reduction of cardiovascular complications in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, it is unclear how use of the 3 antiplatelet medications has changed in commercially insured patients since the advent of the new agents. OBJECTIVES: To (a) describe the adoption of prasugrel and ticagrelor in patients who received percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the onset of ACS and (b) explore patient factors associated with the selection of the drug to provide insight into utilization patterns of these antiplatelet agents. METHODS: Patients who received a new dispensing of an antiplatelet agent following a hospitalization for a PCI administered for ACS were identified from insurance claims between 2009 and 2013. Demographics and comorbid conditions were determined based on a 6-month period before the ACS event. Longitudinal trends in antiplatelet agent selection were illustrated usi...

25 April 2018 in Personalized Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GOGary M Oderda
Gary M Oderda
GLGrant D Lawless
Grant D Lawless
GWGrace C Wright
Grace C Wright
SNSamuel R Nussbaum
Samuel R Nussbaum
RERenwyck Elder
Renwyck Elder
DBDiana I Brixner
Diana I Brixner
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management requires monitoring of disease activity to determine course of treatment. Global assessments are used in clinical practice to determine RA disease activity. Monitoring disease activity via biomarkers may also help providers optimize biologic and nonbiologic drug use while decreasing overall drug spend by delaying use of expensive biologic therapies. By testing multiple biologic domains at the same time, a multibiomarker disease activity test may have utility in RA patient management, through improved intra- and inter-rater reliability. This report provides a comprehensive review of studies of objective measures, single biomarkers and multibiomarker disease activity tests as disease activity measures to decrease uncertainty in treatment decisions, and of biomarkers’ potential impact on economic and clinical outcomes of treatment choices.

26 May 2019 in JACCP: Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TPTavan Parker
Tavan Parker
CTCasey R. Tak
Casey R. Tak
KKKibum Kim
Kibum Kim
MFMichael Feehan
Michael Feehan
MMMark Munger
Mark Munger
Introduction: Community pharmacies are the most accessible health care service locations. While providing greater patient health care access, there is a need for understanding consumer awareness and utilization of pharmacy‐provided services and their satisfaction and loyalty to the pharmacy setting. Objectives: To determine consumer utilization and awareness of services and to identify what factors influence satisfaction and loyalty within a community pharmacy. Methods: A 30‐minute online survey of 9202 adult consumers across the United States was conducted. Patient's self‐reported awareness and utilization, satisfaction with their community pharmacies, and likelihood to recommend their current pharmacy were scored. The likelihood to recommend scores was translated into a Net Promoter Score (NPS). Regression analysis was utilized to identify associated independent variables associated with consumer awareness, utilization, satisfaction, and loyalty to their community pharmacy. Results: Consumer utilization of medication distribution services was more common than use of clinical services, even though many consumers are aware of available clinical services. Consumer satisfaction with and loyalty to their community pharmacy was ranked high (8.67 ± 1.39; 8.56 + 1.66 [both strongly agree], respectively). Trusting the pharmacist to provide accurate medication and general health information were ranked as strongly agree (8.25 ± 2.04) and moderately agree (6.42 ± 2.84). Consumer's NPS (+49.9) was moderately‐high with a major proportion being promoters (60.1%) of their community pharmacy. Multivariate regression showed that community pharmacy satisfaction and loyalty were modestly associated with advanced age, the provision of accurate medication and health information, and medication dispensing functions. Conclusion: Satisfaction and loyalty are vital aspects in the delivery and efficacy of health care, especially in the community pharmacy setting. The results of this study show that consumers are promotors of community pharmacies and that pharmacists are an important source for health and medication information.