Philip A. Weissbrod

Dr. Philip A. Weissbrod

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 April 2025 in American Journal of Gastroenterology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RYRena Yadlapati
Rena Yadlapati
PWPhilip A. Weissbrod
Philip A. Weissbrod
EWErin Walsh
Erin Walsh
TCThomas L. Carroll
Thomas L. Carroll
WCWalter W. Chan
Walter W. Chan
CGC. Prakash Gyawali
C. Prakash Gyawali
INTRODUCTION: The term laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is frequently applied to aerodigestive symptoms despite lack of objective reflux evidence. The aim of this initiative was to develop a modern care paradigm for LPR supported by otolaryngology and gastroenterology disciplines. METHODS: A 28-member international interdisciplinary working group developed practical statements within the following domains: definition/terminology, initial diagnostic evaluation, reflux monitoring, therapeutic trials, behavioral factors and therapy, and risk stratification. Literature reviews guided statement development and were presented at virtual/in-person meetings. Each statement underwent 2 or more rounds of voting per the RAND Appropriateness Method; statements reaching appropriateness with ≥80% agreement are included as recommendations. RESULTS: The term laryngopharyngeal symptoms (LPS) applies to aerodigestive symptoms with potential to be induced by reflux and include cough, voice change, throat clearing, excess throat phlegm, and throat pain. Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) refers to patients with LPS and objective evidence of reflux. Importantly, the presence of LPS does not equate to LPRD. Laryngoscopy has value in assessing for nonreflux laryngopharyngeal processes, but laryngoscopic findings alone cannot diagnose LPRD. LPS patients should be categorized as with or without concurrent esophageal reflux symptoms. While lifestyle modification and empiric trials of acid suppression ± alginates are appropriate when esophageal reflux symptoms coexist, upper endoscopy and ambulatory reflux monitoring are required for LPRD diagnosis when symptoms persist, when LPS is isolated, or when management needs to be escalated to include invasive antireflux management. The two recommended ambulatory reflux monitoring modalities, 24-hour pH-impedance and 96-hour wireless pH monitoring, are not mutually exclusive with distinct roles for the evaluation of LPS. Laryngeal hyperresponsiveness and hypervigilance commonly contribute to both LPS and LPRD presentations and are responsive to laryngeal recalibration therapy and neuromodulators. DISCUSSION: The San Diego Consensus represents the formal modern-day interdisciplinary care paradigm to evaluate and manage LPS and LPRD.

2 August 2012 in The Laryngoscope
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AHAmanda Hu
Amanda Hu
PWPhilip A. Weissbrod
Philip A. Weissbrod
NMNicole C. Maronian
Nicole C. Maronian
JHJennifer Hsia
Jennifer Hsia
JDJoanna M. Davies
Joanna M. Davies
AHAllen D. Hillel
Allen D. Hillel

21 January 2019 in The Laryngoscope
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DBDavid J. Bracken
David J. Bracken
GOGladys Ornelas
Gladys Ornelas
TCTodd P. Coleman
Todd P. Coleman
PWPhilip A. Weissbrod
Philip A. Weissbrod

24 April 2024 in American Journal of Gastroenterology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EWErin Walsh
Erin Walsh
AKAmanda J. Krause
Amanda J. Krause
MGMadeline Greytak
Madeline Greytak
AKAlexander M. Kaizer
Alexander M. Kaizer
PWPhilip A. Weissbrod
Philip A. Weissbrod
RYRena Yadlapati
Rena Yadlapati
INTRODUCTION: Laryngopharyngeal symptoms such as cough, throat clearing, voice change, paradoxic vocal fold movement, or laryngospasm are hyper-responsive behaviors resulting from local irritation (e.g., refluxate) and heightened sympathetic tone. Laryngeal recalibration therapy (LRT) guided by a speech-language pathologist (SLP) provides mechanical desensitization and cognitive recalibration to suppress hyper-responsive laryngeal patterns. The aim of this study was to assess symptom response to LRT among patients with chronic laryngopharyngeal symptoms undergoing evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). METHODS: Adults with chronic laryngopharyngeal symptoms referred for evaluation of GERD to a single center were prospectively followed. Inclusion criteria included ≥2 SLP-directed LRT sessions. Data from endoscopy, ambulatory reflux monitoring, and patient-reported outcomes were collected when available. The primary outcome was symptom response. RESULTS: Sixty-five participants completed LRT: mean age 55.4 years (SD 17.2), 46 (71%) female, mean body mass index 25.6 kg/m2 (6.8), and mean of 3.7 (1.9) LRT sessions. Overall, 55 participants (85%) met criteria for symptom response. Specifically, symptom response was similar between those with isolated laryngopharyngeal symptoms (13/15, 87%) and concomitant laryngopharyngeal/esophageal symptoms (42/50, 84%). Among participants who underwent reflux monitoring, symptom response was similar between those with proven, inconclusive for, and no GERD (18/21 [86%], 8/9 [89%], 10/13 [77%]). DISCUSSION: Eighty-five percent of patients with chronic laryngopharyngeal symptoms referred for GERD evaluation who underwent LRT-experienced laryngeal symptom response. Rates of symptom response were maintained across patients with or without proven GERD and patients with or without concomitant esophageal reflux symptoms. SLP-directed LRT is an effective approach to incorporate into multidisciplinary management of chronic laryngopharyngeal symptoms/laryngopharyngeal reflux disease.

12 May 2022 in The Laryngoscope
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BPBharat Akhanda Panuganti
Bharat Akhanda Panuganti
RVRohith Voora
Rohith Voora
CCCharles Coffey
Charles Coffey
RORyan K. Orosco
Ryan K. Orosco
PWPhilip A. Weissbrod
Philip A. Weissbrod
JCJoseph Califano
Joseph Califano

1 January 2020 in American Journal of Otolaryngology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KBK.K. Bommakanti
K.K. Bommakanti
WMW.J. Moss
W.J. Moss
RWR.A. Weisman
R.A. Weisman
PWPhilip A. Weissbrod
Philip A. Weissbrod