The wide use of ruxolitinib, approved for treating primary and secondary myelofibrosis (MF), has revolutionized the landscape of these diseases. This molecule can reduce spleen volume and constitutional symptoms, guaranteeing patients a better quality of life and survival or even a valid bridge to bone marrow transplantation. Despite a rapid response within the first 3 to 6 months of treatment, some patients fail to achieve a significant benefit or lose early response. After ruxolitinib failure, new drugs are available to provide an additional therapeutic option for these patients. However, the correct timing point for deciding on a therapy shift is still an open challenge. Recently, a clinical prognostic score named RR6 (Response to Ruxolitinib after 6 months) was proposed to determine survival after 6 months of treatment with ruxolitinib in patients affected by MF. We applied this model to a cohort of consecutive patients treated at our center to validate the results obtained in terms of median overall survival (mOS): for the low-risk class, mOS was not reached (as in the training cohort); for the intermediate-risk, mOS was 52 months (95% CI 39–106); for the high-risk, it was 33 (95% 8.5–59). Moreover, in addition to the other studies present in the literature, we evaluated how the new RR6 score could better identify primary MF patients at high risk, with a slight or no agreement compared to DIPSS, contrary to what occurs in secondary MF. Thus, we were able to confirm the predictive power of the RR6 model in our series, which might be of help in guiding future therapeutic choices.

Gilteritinib has been approved as monotherapy in adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) FLT3 mutated with relapsed or refractory disease, in light of its advantages in terms of survival and the favorable safety profile. Hepatobiliary disorders and musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders represent the most frequent adverse reactions associated with gilteritinib, whereas the most frequent serious adverse reaction is acute kidney injury. In the summary of product characteristics, gastrointestinal (GI) events are indicated as very common, in particular diarrhea, nausea and stypsis. Furthermore, serious GI disorders have been observed with gilteritinib in clinical trials, including GI hemorrhage, GI perforation and GI obstruction. However, the association with the FLT3 inhibitor has not been confirmed. Nevertheless, serious GI AEs have been recognized as an important potential risk to be monitored in postmarketing surveillance. We present three cases of serious self-limiting GI events observed in patients on gilteritinib treatment for AML, and an analysis of relevant available postmarketing surveillance data.

Background/Objectives: This prospective study investigated the impact of high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) on anti-COVID-19 antibody levels in previously vaccinated multiple myeloma (MM) patients with confirmed antibody response (AR). Methods: All patients underwent at least a two-dose regimen mRNA vaccination and later received a high-dose melphalan conditioning regimen and ASCT. Results: Fourteen MM patients with confirmed AR underwent a total of nineteen ASCT reinfusions; their median age was 55 (34–67). The study found a significant and progressive decrease in antibody levels after ASCT, from 311 BAU/mL at baseline to 276 BAU/mL and 188 BAU/mL after one and three months, respectively, with a median anti-COVID-19 antibody level reduction of 39% (range 16–66%) that was statistically significant (p = 0.014) using the Friedman test. However, the third “booster” vaccination post-ASCT improved the humoral response at six months in nine patients (50% response rate) and corrected, at least in part, the negative impact of high-dose chemotherapy (p = 0.597). Despite the antibody decline, three patients who contracted COVID-19 after ASCT experienced mild, outpatient-managed infections, suggesting sufficient immune response. Furthermore, booster doses increased the proportion of high-responders (AR > 500 BAU/mL) post-ASCT from 22% to 55% (5/9 patients) at three and six months, respectively. Conclusions: The study concludes that ASCT negatively affects the humoral response, but booster vaccination can improve it, and residual antibodies may prevent severe COVID-19 in these vulnerable patients.