Ganesh Rao

Dr. Ganesh Rao


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2017 in The Lancet Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AMAnita Mahajan
Anita Mahajan
SASalmaan Ahmed
Salmaan Ahmed
MMMary Frances McAleer
Mary Frances McAleer
JWJeffrey S Weinberg
Jeffrey S Weinberg
JLJing Li
Jing Li
GRGanesh Rao
Ganesh Rao

25 February 2016 in JCI Insight
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KGKonrad Gabrusiewicz
Konrad Gabrusiewicz
BRBenjamin Rodriguez
Benjamin Rodriguez
JWJun Wei
Jun Wei
YHYuuri Hashimoto
Yuuri Hashimoto
LHLuke M. Healy
Luke M. Healy
Amy B. HeimbergerAmy B. Heimberger
Amy B. Heimberger
Glioblastomas are highly infiltrated by diverse immune cells, including microglia, macrophages, and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). Understanding the mechanisms by which glioblastoma-associated myeloid cells (GAMs) undergo metamorphosis into tumor-supportive cells, characterizing the heterogeneity of immune cell phenotypes within glioblastoma subtypes, and discovering new targets can help the design of new efficient immunotherapies. In this study, we performed a comprehensive battery of immune phenotyping, whole-genome microarray analysis, and microRNA expression profiling of GAMs with matched blood monocytes, healthy donor monocytes, normal brain microglia, nonpolarized M0 macrophages, and polarized M1, M2a, M2c macrophages. Glioblastoma patients had an elevated number of monocytes relative to healthy donors. Among CD11b+ cells, microglia and MDSCs constituted a higher percentage of GAMs than did macrophages. GAM profiling using flow cytometry studies revealed a continuum between the M1- and M2-like phenotype. Contrary to current dogma, GAMs exhibited distinct immunological functions, with the former aligned close to nonpolarized M0 macrophages.

18 June 2020 in Clinical Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GRGanesh Rao
Ganesh Rao
KLKhatri Latha
Khatri Latha
MOMartina Ott
Martina Ott
ASAria Sabbagh
Aria Sabbagh
AMAnantha Marisetty
Anantha Marisetty
Amy B. HeimbergerAmy B. Heimberger
Amy B. Heimberger
Purpose: Anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) therapy has demonstrated inconsistent therapeutic results in patients with glioblastoma (GBM) including those with profound impairments in CD8 T-cell effector responses. Experimental Design: We ablated the CD8α gene in BL6 mice and intercrossed them with Ntv-a mice to determine how CD8 T cells affect malignant progression in forming endogenous gliomas. Tumor-bearing mice were treated with PD-1 to determine the efficacy of this treatment in the absence of T cells. The tumor microenvironment of treated and control mice was analyzed by IHC and FACS. Results: We observed a survival benefit in immunocompetent mice with endogenously arising intracranial glioblastomas after intravenous administration of anti–PD-1. The therapeutic effect of PD-1 administration persisted in mice even after genetic ablation of the CD8 gene (CD8−/−). CD11b+ and Iba1+ monocytes and macrophages were enriched in the glioma microenvironment of the CD8−/− mice. The macrophages and microglia assumed a proinflammatory M1 response signature in the setting of anti–PD-1 blockade through the elimination of PD-1–expressing macrophages and microglia in the tumor microenvironment. Anti–PD-1 can inhibit the proliferation of and induce apoptosis of microglia through antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, as fluorescently labeled anti–PD-1 was shown to gain direct access to the glioma microenvironment. Conclusions: Our results show that the therapeutic effect of anti–PD-1 blockade in GBM may be mediated by the innate immune system, rather than by CD8 T cells. Anti–PD-1 immunologically modulates innate immunity in the glioma microenvironment—likely a key mode of activity.

29 June 2012 in Neuro-Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TDTiffany A. Doucette
Tiffany A. Doucette
LKLing-Yuan Kong
Ling-Yuan Kong
YYYuhui Yang
Yuhui Yang
SFSherise D. Ferguson
Sherise D. Ferguson
JYJinbo Yang
Jinbo Yang
GRGanesh Rao
Ganesh Rao
Signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 3 has been described as a “master regulator” of signaling pathways involved in the transition from low-grade glioma (LGG) to high-grade glioma (HGG). Although STAT3 is overexpressed in HGGs, it remains unclear whether its overexpression is sufficient to induce or promote the malignant progression of glioma. To characterize the effect of STAT3 expression on tumor progression in vivo, we expressed the STAT3 gene in glioneuronal progenitor cells in mice. STAT3 was expressed alone or concurrently with platelet-derived growth factor B (PDGFB), a well-described initiator of LGG. STAT3 alone was insufficient to induce tumor formation; however, coexpression of STAT3 with PDGFB in mice resulted in a significantly higher incidence of HGGs than PDGFB alone. The median symptomatic tumor latency in mice coexpressing STAT3 and PDGFB was significantly shorter, and mice that developed symptomatic tumors demonstrated significantly higher expression of phosphorylated STAT3 intratumorally. In HGGs, expression of STAT3 was associated with suppression of apoptosis and an increase in tumor cell proliferation. HGGs induced by STAT3 and PDGFB also displayed frequent foci of necrosis and microvascular proliferation. The expression of CD31 (a marker of endothelial proliferation) was significantly higher in tumors induced by coexpression of STAT3 and PDGFB. When mice injected with PDGFB and STAT3 were treated with a STAT3 inhibitor, median survival increased and the incidence of HGG and CD31 expression decreased significantly. These results demonstrate that STAT3 promotes the malignant progression of glioma. Inhibiting STAT3 expression mitigates tumor progression and improves survival, validating it as a therapeutic target.

1 December 2010 in Clinical Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LKLing-Yuan Kong
Ling-Yuan Kong
AWAdam S. Wu
Adam S. Wu
TDTiffany Doucette
Tiffany Doucette
JWJun Wei
Jun Wei
WPWaldemar Priebe
Waldemar Priebe
Amy B. HeimbergerAmy B. Heimberger
Amy B. Heimberger
Purpose: Preclinical murine model systems used for the assessment of therapeutics have not been predictive of human clinical responses, primarily because their clonotypic nature does not recapitulate the heterogeneous biology and immunosuppressive mechanisms of humans. Relevant model systems with mice that are immunologically competent are needed to evaluate the efficacy of therapeutic agents, especially immunotherapeutics. Experimental Design: Using the RCAS/Ntv-a system, mice were engineered to coexpress platelet-derived growth factor B (PDGF-B) receptor + B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) under the control of the glioneuronal specific Nestin promoter. The degree and type of tumor-mediated immunosuppression were determined in these endogenously arising gliomas on the basis of the presence of macrophages and regulatory T cells. The immunotherapeutic agent WP1066 was tested in vivo to assess therapeutic efficacy and immunomodulation. Results: Ntv-a mice were injected with RCAS vectors to express PDGF-B + Bcl-2, resulting in both low- and high-grade gliomas. Consistent with observations in human high-grade gliomas, mice with high-grade gliomas also developed a marked intratumoral influx of macrophages that was influenced by tumor signal transducer and activator of transduction 3 (STAT3) expression. The presence of intratumoral F4/80 macrophages was a negative prognosticator for long-term survival. In mice coexpressing PDGF-B + Bcl-2that were treated with WP1066, there was 55.5% increase in median survival time (P < 0.01), with an associated inhibition of intratumoral STAT3 and macrophages. Conclusions: Although randomization is necessary for including mice in a therapeutic trial, these murine model systems are more suitable for testing therapeutics, especially immunotherapeutics, in the context of translational studies. Clin Cancer Res; 16(23); 5722–33. ©2010 AACR.

12 May 2020 in Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMMatthew Muir
Matthew Muir
SGSricharan Gopakumar
Sricharan Gopakumar
Jeffrey TraylorJeffrey Traylor
Jeffrey Traylor
SLSungho Lee
Sungho Lee
GRGanesh Rao
Ganesh Rao
The increasingly detailed genetic characterization of glioblastoma (GBM) has failed to translate into meaningful breakthroughs in treatment. This is likely to be attributed to molecular heterogenei...