James A. Martin

Dr. James A. Martin


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 February 2011 in Journal of Orthopaedic Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DADonald D. Anderson
Donald D. Anderson
SCSusan Chubinskaya
Susan Chubinskaya
Farshid GuilakFarshid Guilak
Farshid Guilak
JMJames A. Martin
James A. Martin
TOTheodore R. Oegema
Theodore R. Oegema
JBJoseph A. Buckwalter
Joseph A. Buckwalter
Even with current treatments of acute joint injuries, more than 40% of people who suffer significant ligament or meniscus tears, or articular surface injuries, will develop osteoarthritis (OA). Correspondingly, 12% or more of all patients with lower extremity OA have a history of joint injury. Recent research suggests that acute joint damage that occurs at the time of an injury initiates a sequence of events that can lead to progressive articular surface damage. New molecular interventions, combined with evolving surgical methods, aim to minimize or prevent progressive tissue damage triggered by joint injury. Seizing the potential for progress in the treatment of joint injuries to forestall OA will depend on advances in (1) quantitative methods of assessing the injury severity, including both structural damage and biologic responses, (2) understanding of the pathogenesis of post‐traumatic OA, taking into account potential interactions among the different tissues and the role of post‐traumatic incongruity and instability, and (3) application of engineering and molecular research to develop new methods of treating injured joints. This paper highlights recent advances in understanding of the structural damage and the acute biological response following joint injury, and it identifies important directions for future research. © 2011 Orthopaedic Research Society Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 29:802–809

1 September 2002 in Biogerontology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JMJames A. Martin
James A. Martin
JBJoseph A. Buckwalter
Joseph A. Buckwalter

20 May 2006 in Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJ Buckwalter
J Buckwalter
JMJames A. Martin
James A. Martin

1 January 2003 in Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JMJames A. Martin
James A. Martin
JBJoseph A. Buckwalter
Joseph A. Buckwalter
Background:With increasing age, the prevalence of osteoarthritis increases and the efficacy of articular cartilage repair decreases. As chondrocytes age, they synthesize smaller, less uniform aggrecan molecules and less functional link proteins, their mitotic and synthetic activity decline, and thei

11 July 2013 in Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YYYin Yu
Yin Yu
YZYahui Zhang
Yahui Zhang
JMJames A. Martin
James A. Martin
IOIbrahim T. Ozbolat
Ibrahim T. Ozbolat
Organ printing is a novel concept recently introduced in developing artificial three-dimensional organs to bridge the gap between transplantation needs and organ shortage. One of the major challenges is inclusion of blood-vessellike channels between layers to support cell viability, postprinting functionality in terms of nutrient transport, and waste removal. In this research, we developed a novel and effective method to print tubular channels encapsulating cells in alginate to mimic the natural vascular system. An experimental investigation into the influence on cartilage progenitor cell (CPCs) survival, and the function of printing parameters during and after the printing process were presented. CPC functionality was evaluated by checking tissue-specific genetic marker expression and extracellular matrix production. Our results demonstrated the capability of direct fabrication of cell-laden tubular channels by our newly designed coaxial nozzle assembly and revealed that the bioprinting process could induce quantifiable cell death due to changes in dispensing pressure, coaxial nozzle geometry, and biomaterial concentration. Cells were able to recover during incubation, as well as to undergo differentiation with high-level cartilage-associated gene expression. These findings may not only help optimize our system but also can be applied to biomanufacturing of 3D functional cellular tissue engineering constructs for various organ systems.

27 April 2010 in The American Journal of Sports Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HAH. Davis Adkisson
H. Davis Adkisson
JMJames A. Martin
James A. Martin
RARichard L. Amendola
Richard L. Amendola
CMCurt Milliman
Curt Milliman
KMKelsey A. Mauch
Kelsey A. Mauch
JBJoseph A. Buckwalter
Joseph A. Buckwalter
Background: Donor-site morbidity, limited numbers of cells, loss of phenotype during ex vivo expansion, and age-related decline in chondrogenic activity present critical obstacles to the use of autologous chondrocyte implantation for cartilage repair. Chondrocytes from juvenile cadaveric donors may represent an alternative to autologous cells. Hypothesis/Purpose: The authors hypothesized that juvenile chondrocyte would show stronger and more stable chondrogenic activity than adult cells in vitro and that juvenile cells pose little risk of immunologic incompatibility in adult hosts. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Cartilage samples were from juvenile (13 years old) donors. The chondrogenic activity of freshly isolated human articular chondrocytes and of expanded cells after monolayer culture was measured by proteoglycan assay, gene expression analysis, and histology. Lymphocyte proliferation assays were used to assess immunogenic activity. Results: Proteoglycan content in neocartilage produced by juvenile chondrocytes was 100-fold higher than in neocartilage produced by adult cells. Collagen type II and type IX mRNA in fresh juvenile chondrocytes were 100- and 700-fold higher, respectively, than in adult chondrocytes. The distributions of collagens II and IX were similar in native juvenile cartilage and in neocartilage made by juvenile cells. Juvenile cells grew significantly faster in monolayer cultures than adult cells (P = .002) and proteoglycan levels produced in agarose culture was significantly higher in juvenile cells than in adult cells after multiple passages (P < .001). Juvenile chondrocytes did not stimulate lymphocyte proliferation. Conclusion: These results document a dramatic age-related decline in human chondrocyte chondrogenic potential and show that allogeneic juvenile chondrocytes do not stimulate an immunologic response in vivo. Clinical Relevance: Juvenile human chondrocytes have greater potential to restore articular cartilage than adult cells, and may be transplanted without the fear of rejection, suggesting a new allogeneic approach to restoring articular cartilage in older individuals.