Cranioplasty is a surgical intervention aimed at reestablishing the integrity of skull defects, and should be considered the conclusion of a surgical act that began with bone flap removal. Autologous bone is still considered the treatment of choice for cranioplasty. An alternative choice is bioceramic porous hydroxyapatite (HA) as it is one of the materials that meets and comes closest to the biomimetic characteristics of bone. The authors analyzed the clinical charts, compiled by the neurosurgeon, of all patients treated with custom-made porous HA devices (Custom Bone Service Fin-Ceramica, Faenza) from which epidemiological and pathological data as well as material-related complications were extrapolated. From November 1997 to December 2010, 1549 patients underwent cranioplasty with the implantation of 1608 custom-made porous HA devices. HA was used in 53.8% of patients for decompressive craniectomy after trauma or intracranial hemorrhage, while the remaining cases were for treated for comminuted fracture, cutaneous or osseous resection, cranial malformation, autologous bone reabsorption or infection or rejection of previously implanted material. The incidence of adverse events in patients treated for cranioplasty, as first line treatment was 4.78% (56 events/1171 patients), and 5.02%, (19 events/378 patients) at second line. This study demonstrates that HA is a safe and effective material, is well tolerated in both adult and pediatric patients, and meets the requirements necessary to repair craniolacunia.

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: The authors’ goal was to clarify whether a bone substitute combined with antibiotics might gain a hold in spinal surgery as a preventive treatment for early infections (EIs). Background: A relatively infrequent but severe complication in spinal surgery is the occurrence of EIs. Methods: The authors retrospectively compared a population undergoing posterolateral fusion with Mg-enriched hydroxyapatite paste mixed with 60 mg rifampicin powder, with a matched population treated with autologous bone without antibiotics. A total of 30 patients from 2020 to 2021 were included in our study. We estimated EI’s relative risk and the number needed to treat. Statistical analyses were performed using the R statistical package v3.4.1 (http://www.r-project.org). Results: No early infections occurred in the population treated with antibiotic-combined bone substitutes, compared with 6.7% of patients treated with autologous bone without antibiotics. The relative risk of EIs was 0.33 (P=.49; 95% CI=0.01–7.58) and the number needed to treat was 15. Conclusions: The results support the hypothesis that combining bone substitutes with antibiotics may decrease the risk of EIs and could be a viable option to improve spinal surgery outcomes. However, a larger sample size would be needed to confirm the benefit of rifampicin-combined Mg-enriched hydroxyapatite substitutes over autologous bone for surgical site infection prevention. Level of Evidence: Level 3.