In recent years, the incidence of tuberculosis (TB) and mortality caused by the disease have been decreasing. However, the number of drug-resistant tuberculosis patients is increasing rapidly year by year. Here, a total of 380 Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB)-positive formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue (FFPE) specimens diagnosed in the Department of Pathology of the Eighth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital were collected. Among 380 cases of MTB, 85 (22.37%) were susceptible to four anti-TB drugs and the remaining 295 (77.63%) were resistant to one or more drugs. The rate of MDR-TB was higher in previously treated cases (52.53%) than in new cases [(36.65%), p < 0.05]. Of previously treated cases, the rate of drug resistance was higher in females than in males (p < 0.05). Among specimens obtained from males, the rate of drug resistance was higher in new cases than in previously treated cases (p < 0.05). Of mutation in drug resistance-related genes, the majority (53/380, 13.95%) of rpoB gene carried the D516V mutation, and 13.42% (51/380) featured mutations in both the katG and inhA genes. Among the total specimens, 18.68% (71/380) carried the 88 M mutation in the rpsL gene, and the embB gene focused on the 306 M2 mutation with a mutation rate of 19.74%. Among the resistant INH, the mutation rate of −15 M was higher in resistance to more than one drug than in monodrug-resistant (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the drug resistance of MTB is still very severe and the timely detection of drug resistance is conducive to the precise treatment of TB.

Background: Although propeller flaps are a useful option for soft tissue defect reconstruction, reports based on the perforators of the lateral circumflex femoral artery (LCFA) are rare. We aimed to present our experience in defect reconstruction using the propeller flaps based on perforators from different branches of LCFA and apply these flaps in soft tissue defect reconstruction of the lower extremities. Methods: Twenty nine patients (32 flaps) underwent defect reconstruction using propeller flaps based on the perforator of the LCFA. Defects were located from the groin to the proximal leg. According to the source vessels from which the perforator originated, flaps were categorized into types I, II, III and IV, which represented perforators from the transverse, descending, oblique, and rectus femoris branches, respectively. Type II flaps were subdivided into types IIa and IIb flaps based on antegrade and reverse flows of the descending branch. Results: Flap sizes ranged from 12 × 6 cm to 30 × 15 cm (average, 22.69 × 9.19 cm) with the length of the vascular pedicle ranging from 3 to 7 cm (average, 4.86 cm). Flaps were rotated from 60° to 180° (average, 144.06°). There were 3 type I, 10 type IIa, 4 type IIb, 13 type III and, and 2 type IV flaps. Twenty-nine flaps survived after surgery. Total flap necrosis and venous congestion of the distal flap portion occurred in 1 and 2 patients, respectively. Conclusions: Reconstruction using propeller flaps based on perforators of the LCFA is a safe, reliable, and versatile option for defect reconstruction of the lower extremities; however, it requires meticulous surgical dissection and patience.