BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2)-deficient tumors display impaired homologous recombination repair (HRR) and enhanced sensitivity to DNA damaging agents or to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi). Their efficacy in germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA1/2)-mutated metastatic breast cancers has been recently confirmed in clinical trials. Numerous mechanisms of PARPi resistance have been described, whose clinical relevance in gBRCA-mutated breast cancer is unknown. This highlights the need to identify functional biomarkers to better predict PARPi sensitivity. We investigated the in vivo mechanisms of PARPi resistance in gBRCA1 patient-derived tumor xenografts (PDXs) exhibiting differential response to PARPi. Analysis included exome sequencing and immunostaining of DNA damage response proteins to functionally evaluate HRR. Findings were validated in a retrospective sample set from gBRCA1/2-cancer patients treated with PARPi. RAD51 nuclear foci, a surrogate marker of HRR functionality, were the only common feature in PDX and patient samples with primary or acquired PARPi resistance. Consistently, low RAD51 was associated with objective response to PARPi. Evaluation of the RAD51 biomarker in untreated tumors was feasible due to endogenous DNA damage. In PARPi-resistant gBRCA1 PDXs, genetic analysis found no in-frame secondary mutations, but BRCA1 hypomorphic proteins in 60% of the models, TP53BP1-loss in 20% and RAD51-amplification in one sample, none mutually exclusive. Conversely, one of three PARPi-resistant gBRCA2 tumors displayed BRCA2 restoration by exome sequencing. In PDXs, PARPi resistance could be reverted upon combination of a PARPi with an ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) inhibitor. Detection of RAD51 foci in gBRCA tumors correlates with PARPi resistance regardless of the underlying mechanism restoring HRR function. This is a promising biomarker to be used in the clinic to better select patients for PARPi therapy. Our study also supports the clinical development of PARPi combinations such as those with ATM inhibitors.

Poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) are effective in cancers with defective homologous recombination DNA repair (HRR), including BRCA1/2‐related cancers. A test to identify additional HRR‐deficient tumors will help to extend their use in new indications. We evaluated the activity of the PARPi olaparib in patient‐derived tumor xenografts (PDXs) from breast cancer (BC) patients and investigated mechanisms of sensitivity through exome sequencing, BRCA1 promoter methylation analysis, and immunostaining of HRR proteins, including RAD51 nuclear foci. In an independent BC PDX panel, the predictive capacity of the RAD51 score and the homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) score were compared. To examine the clinical feasibility of the RAD51 assay, we scored archival breast tumor samples, including PALB2‐related hereditary cancers. The RAD51 score was highly discriminative of PARPi sensitivity versus PARPi resistance in BC PDXs and outperformed the genomic test. In clinical samples, all PALB2‐related tumors were classified as HRR‐deficient by the RAD51 score. The functional biomarker RAD51 enables the identification of PARPi‐sensitive BC and broadens the population who may benefit from this therapy beyond BRCA1/2‐related cancers. Synopsis Sensitive and highly specific biomarkers usable in archived formalin fixed parafin embedded (FFPE) tumour samples are needed to extend the use of PARP inhibitors beyond BRCA1/2‐related cancers. The RAD51 score may satisfy this clinical unmet need. The RAD51 score shows complete discriminative capacity in predicting PARP inhibitor response. The RAD51 score is feasible in routine breast tumor samples without prior exposure to DNA damaging agents. Carrying a PALB2 mutation is associated with a low RAD51score.

We present a case report that shows an abscopal effect in the context of a safety and efficacy clinical trial for histotripsy as ablation technique in liver tumors. The abscopal effect appears in the form of reduction in the volume of nontreated tumor lesions in the same organ, as well as sustained reduction of tumor marker [carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)] that extends weeks away of the procedure. Histotripsy is a novel noninvasive, nonthermal, and nonionizing precise ablation technique for tissue destruction guided by ultrasonography. We discuss the feasibility of this technique compared with other focal therapies and its possibilities as immune system enhancer.

Objective: To evaluate the 1-year clinical outcomes of patients enrolled in the #HOPE4LIVER trial of hepatic histotripsy. Background: Histotripsy is a novel noninvasive, non-thermal–focused ultrasound therapy that liquefies tissue at the focal point of the transducer. Following diagnostic ultrasound targeting, an automated treatment is performed through a robotic arm to treat a user-defined volume of tissue. Methods: Forty-seven patients were enrolled at 14 sites in the United States and Europe. Included patients were ineligible for or had opted out of standard therapies. Tumor control was evaluated through a core laboratory with a primary assessment at each time point and a post hoc assessment performed following the completion of each time point to allow for a learning curve of interpreting imaging findings of this novel therapy. Overall survival and freedom from local tumor progression were evaluated through the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Nineteen patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and 28 with metastatic disease were enrolled, of whom 89.5% (17/19) and 96.4% (27/28) had multifocal hepatic tumors at the time of treatment. Fifty-two tumors were treated. The 1-year local control rate was 63.4% using the primary assessment method and 90% using the post hoc method. There were 6 serious adverse device-related effects within 30 days of treatment. Only one nonserious adverse device-related effect was observed after 30 days of treatment. Overall survival at 1-year was 73.3% for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and 48.6% for patients with metastatic disease. Conclusions: Histotripsy results in local control of liver tumors at 1 year, which is consistent with current locoregional therapies. The safety profile is favorable, and survival at 1 year is comparable with other therapies for similar disease stages.