Jie Yu

Dr. Jie Yu

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 July 2022 in Frontiers in Pain Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JYJia-Xuan Yang
Jia-Xuan Yang
HWHong-Fei Wang
Hong-Fei Wang
JCJi-Zhun Chen
Ji-Zhun Chen
HLHan-Yu Li
Han-Yu Li
JHJi-Chen Hu
Ji-Chen Hu
Jie YuJie Yu
Jie Yu
Chronic pain is a long-standing unpleasant sensory and emotional feeling that has a tremendous impact on the physiological functions of the body, manifesting itself as a dysfunction of the nervous system, which can occur with peripheral and central sensitization. Many recent studies have shown that a variety of common immune cells in the immune system are involved in chronic pain by acting on the peripheral or central nervous system, especially in the autoimmune diseases. This article reviews the mechanisms of regulation of the sensory nervous system by neutrophils, macrophages, mast cells, B cells, T cells, and central glial cells. In addition, we discuss in more detail the influence of each immune cell on the initiation, maintenance, and resolution of chronic pain. Neutrophils, macrophages, and mast cells as intrinsic immune cells can induce the transition from acute to chronic pain and its maintenance; B cells and T cells as adaptive immune cells are mainly involved in the initiation of chronic pain, and T cells also contribute to the resolution of it; the role of glial cells in the nervous system can be extended to the beginning and end of chronic pain. This article aims to promote the understanding of the neuroimmune mechanisms of chronic pain, and to provide new therapeutic ideas and strategies for the control of chronic pain at the immune cellular level.

9 April 2020 in bioRxiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
RCRongrong Chen
Rongrong Chen
KWKeer Wang
Keer Wang
Jie YuJie Yu
Jie Yu
DHDerek Howard
Derek Howard
LFLeon French
Leon French
ZXZhenghao Xu
Zhenghao Xu
By engaging angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2 or Ace2), the novel pathogenic SARS-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) may invade host cells in many organs, including the brain. However, the distribution of ACE2 in the brain is still obscure. Here we investigated the ACE2 expression in the brain by analyzing data from publicly available brain transcriptome databases. According to our spatial distribution analysis, ACE2 was relatively highly expressed in some brain locations, such as the choroid plexus and paraventricular nuclei of the thalamus. According to cell-type distribution analysis, nuclear expression of ACE2 was found in many neurons (both excitatory and inhibitory neurons) and some non-neuron cells (mainly astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, and endothelial cells) in human middle temporal gyrus and posterior cingulate cortex. A few ACE2-expressing nuclei were found in a hippocampal dataset, and none were detected in the prefrontal cortex. Except for the additional high expression of Ace2 in the olfactory bulb areas for spatial distribution as well as in the pericytes and endothelial cells for cell-type distribution, the distribution of Ace2 in mouse brain was similar to that in the human brain. Thus, our results reveal an outline of ACE2/Ace2 distribution in the human and mouse brain, which indicates the brain infection of SARS-CoV-2 may be capable of inducing central nervous system symptoms in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Potential species differences should be considered when using mouse models to study the neurological effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

10 November 2021 in Science Translational Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ACAnd Song Cai
And Song Cai
AMAubin Moutal
Aubin Moutal
Jie YuJie Yu
Jie Yu
LCLindsey A. Chew
Lindsey A. Chew
JIJoerg Isensee
Joerg Isensee
Rajesh KhannaRajesh Khanna
Rajesh Khanna
Protein-protein interaction inhibitor of the sodium NaV1.7 channel has analgesic effects in preclinical models of pain.

7 November 2019 in ACS Chemical Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YZYuan Zhou
Yuan Zhou
SCSong Cai
Song Cai
AMAubin Moutal
Aubin Moutal
Jie YuJie Yu
Jie Yu
KGKimberly Gómez
Kimberly Gómez
Rajesh KhannaRajesh Khanna
Rajesh Khanna

18 September 2020 in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
YJYue-Peng Jiang
Yue-Peng Jiang
XZXiao-Xuan Zhao
Xiao-Xuan Zhao
RCRong-Rong Chen
Rong-Rong Chen
ZXZheng-Hao Xu
Zheng-Hao Xu
CWCheng-Ping Wen
Cheng-Ping Wen
Jie YuJie Yu
Jie Yu
Background: Lupus nephritis (LN) remains a predominant cause of morbidity and mortality in SLE. Here we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the induction treatment with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and cyclophosphamide (CYC) for LN. Methods: Relevant literature was searched by computer from the establishment of the database to November 2019. A meta-analysis was conducted to analysis the efficacy and safety between mycophenolate mofetil and cyclophosphamide as induction therapy in LN patients. The primary end-point was response to urine protein, serum creatinine (Scr) and serum complement C3, and the secondary end-points were complete remission and adverse reactions. Results: Eighteen articles were selected for the final meta-analysis, involving 1989 patients with LN, of which the renal biopsy result could be classified into class III–V according to the standards of WHO/ISN. The results revealed that MMF was superior to CYC in increasing the level of serum complement C3 [SMD = 0.475, 95%CI (0.230–0.719)] and complete remission [RR = 1.231, 95%CI (1.055–1.437)]. Furthermore, the subgroup analysis showed that it was in Asian patients, rather than in Caucasian patients, that CYC exerted a better effect on lowering the level of urine protein (UPRO) than MMF [SMD = 0.405, 95%CI (0.081–0.730)]. Besides, when the initial UPRO level was less than 4 g/day, the effect of CYC was better than MMF [SMD = 0.303, 95%CI (0.014–0.591)]. There was no significant difference between MMF and CYC in improving Scr [SMD = 0.090, 95%CI (−0.060–0.239)]. When it came to the comparison of safety between MMF and CYC, the meta-analysis showed that MMF was superior to CYC in decreasing infection in Caucasian patients [RR = 0.727, 95%CI (0.532–0.993)], reducing the risk of leukopenia and menstrual abnormalities in Asian patients and lowering the frequency of gastrointestinal symptoms [RR = 0.639, 95%CI (0.564–0.724)], independent of race. Conclusions: MMF precedes CYC in improving serum complement C3 and complete remission regardless of race, as well as shows fewer adverse drug reactions in the induction treatment of LN belonging to type III–V. But for Asian patients or those initial UPRO levels are less than 4 g/day, CYC may be superior to MMF.

15 December 2021 in Pain
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LMLaurent Martin
Laurent Martin
MIMohab Ibrahim
Mohab Ibrahim
KGKimberly Gomez
Kimberly Gomez
Jie YuJie Yu
Jie Yu
SCSong Cai
Song Cai
APAmol Patwardhan
Amol Patwardhan
Intrathecal application of contulakin-G (CGX), a conotoxin peptide and a neurotensin analogue, has been demonstrated to be safe and potentially analgesic in humans. However, the mechanism of action for CGX analgesia is unknown. We hypothesized that spinal application of CGX produces antinociception through activation of the presynaptic neurotensin receptor (NTSR)2. In this study, we assessed the mechanisms of CGX antinociception in rodent models of inflammatory and neuropathic pain. Intrathecal administration of CGX, dose dependently, inhibited thermal and mechanical hypersensitivities in rodents of both sexes. Pharmacological and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/Cas9 editing of NTSR2 reversed CGX-induced antinociception without affecting morphine analgesia. Electrophysiological and gene editing approaches demonstrated that CGX inhibition was dependent on the R-type voltage-gated calcium channel (Cav2.3) in sensory neurons. Anatomical studies demonstrated coexpression of NTSR2 and Cav2.3 in dorsal root ganglion neurons. Finally, synaptic fractionation and slice electrophysiology recordings confirmed a predominantly presynaptic effect. Together, these data reveal a nonopioid pathway engaged by a human-tested drug to produce antinociception.